Public tenders for business in San-diego United States

Find all Business tenders in the world.
Finding business opportunities has never been easier.

Results for business. Make a new search!

U -- Asher Business Practices

Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command | Published April 1, 2015  -  Deadline April 7, 2015
cpvs

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific (SSC Pacific) intends to award a firm fixed price purchase order on a sole source basis to Asher Strategies. The requirement is for the purchase of the following: Line Item 0001: Asher Business Practice Seminar QTY: 1 Lot This notice of intent is not a request for quote. A determination by the government not to compete based upon responses to this notice is solely at the discretion of the government. Questions by phone or fax will not be considered. Acquisition of Commercial Items under FAR Part 12 and Simplified Acquisitions Procedures under FAR Part 13 apply. The applicable NAICS Code is 611430 and the size standard is $11,000,000.00. The point of contact for this announcement is Gerald Burch at gerald.burch@navy.mil. To respond to this announcement, you must be registered to the SPAWAR E- Commerce website at https://e-commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil and upload your inquiry under SSC Pacific/Simplified Acquisitions/N66001-15-T-6728. All responding vendors must be registered to the System for Award Management (SAM) website prior to award of contract. Information can be found at https://www.sam.gov.

D -- Serena Business Manager Software Maintenance

Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command | Published May 4, 2016  -  Deadline May 10, 2016
cpvs

This is a SSC Pacific combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Competitive quotes are being requested under N66001-15-T-8031 for Serena Business Manager Software Maintenance Renewal. This requirement is set-aside for small business, NAICS code is 541511 and business size standard is $27,500.000. Quote Brand NameDo Not Substitute CLIN 0001 Serena business Manager, Concurrent- 11 Licenses 1 Lot Renewal Maintenance for SBM, Concurrent Part Number: TTSEATS-BM-CC-MFRR Period of Performance: 06/30/16 06/29/17 CLIN 0002 Serena Business Manager, Named 18 Licenses 1 Lot Renewal Maintenance for SBM, Named Part Number: TTSEATS-BM-N-MFRR Period of Performance: 06/30/16 06/29/17 CLIN 0003 Serena Business Manager, Production Server 1 License 1 Lot Renewal Maintenance for SBM, Production Server Part Number: TTSERVERS-MUS-MFRR Period of Performance: 06/30/16 06/29/17 Basis for award: The government anticipates awarding a firm-fixed price purchase order and it will be based on the lowest technically acceptable quote. This RFQ closes on May 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Pacific Daylight Time (PDT). Quotes must be uploaded on the SPAWAR e-commerce website at https://e- commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil under SSC Pacific/Simplified Acquisitions/N66001-16-T-8031 The point of contact for this solicitation is Rebeca Holguin at rebeca.holguin@navy.mil Please include RFQ N66001-16-T-8031 on all inquiries. PLEASE NOTE: 1. Quotes and questions emailed directly to my email inbox will NOT be considered. 2. If you need assistance with the website you MUST contact the SPAWAR Helpdesk at 858-537-0644 or email at paperless.spawar@navy.mil 3. Please include the following: a. CAGE Code b. DUNS c. Business Size 4. Preferred method of shipment: FOB Destination. All responding vendors must have a completed registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) program prior to award of contract. Information to register in SAM can be found at: https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. Complete SAM registration means a registered DUNS and CAGE Code numbers. This solicitation document incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-87 (04/06/2016) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), March 16, 2016.It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses can be accessed in full text at www.farsite.hill.af.mil. FAR Clause at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors Commercial, and 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions Commercial Items, incorporated by reference, applies to this acquisition. FAR Clause 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items and DFAR S 252.212-7000 Offeror Representations and Certifications-- Commercial Items applies to this acquisition in e-Commerce. DFARS 252.204-7000- Disclosure of Information; 252,204-7012-Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information; 252.203-7998-Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality AgreementsRepresentation; 252.203-7999- Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements Representation; 252.211-7003-Item Identification & Valuation FAR Clause 52.212-5-Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders, 52.211-6, Brand Name or Equal (Aug 1999), FAR 52.204-2 Security Requirements, 52.222-3, Convict Labor (E.O. 11755), 52.222-19, Child Labor Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (E.O. 13126), 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999), 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (E.O. 11246), 52.225- 13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury), 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds TransferCentral Contractor Registration (31 U.S.C. 3332), FAR 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive OrdersCommercial Items (Deviation) also applies to this acquisition, FAR Clause 52.204-99 Orders and Solicitations, FAR 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities, 252.209-7998, Representation Regarding Conviction of a Felony Criminal Violation under any Federal or State Law. Electronic and Information Technology (EIT) accessibility Standards developed by the U.S. Access Board (36 CFR Part 1194) and incorporated in the FAR (Part 39.2). The Technical Standards and their reference numbers are as follows: 1194.21 Software applications and operating systems. 1194.22 Web-based intranet and internet information and applications. 1194.23 Telecommunications products. 1194.24 Video and multimedia products. 1194.25 Self-contained, closed products. 1194.26 Desktop and portable computers.

C--AE IDIQ MULTI-DISCIPLINE SERVICES FOR LARGE PROJECTS, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE, NAVFAC SW, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published August 3, 2015
cpvs

ARCHITECT - ENGINEERING INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR MULTI-DISCIPLINE SERVICES FOR LARGE PROJECTS, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE, NAVFAC SW, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

C--FACILITY PLANNING SERVICES ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) IDIQ CONTRACT, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST, SAN DIEGO, CA

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published August 22, 2016
cpvs

AWARD NOTICE, N62473-16-D-1846, FACILITY PLANNING SERVICES ARCHITECT-ENGINEER (A-E) INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE, NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC) SOUTHWEST, SAN DIEGO, CA

J -- Navy ERP & Business Intelligence Support

Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command | Published February 12, 2016
cpvs

No Description Provided

35 -- Material in Support of SSC PACIFIC's Supply Service Center Warehouse Operations Small Business Set Aside

Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command | Published September 1, 2016  -  Deadline September 8, 2016
cpvs

This is an SSC Pacific combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Competitive quotes are being requested under N66001-16-T-0480. This requirement is set-aside for Small Businesses, NAICS code is 333318 and business size standard is 1,000 employees. This is a Brand Name or Equal Requirement - applies to all items. Details for Items 0001 through 0026 are attached as a separate document. Ship to Address Information: SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific, San Diego, California Basis for award: The government anticipates awarding a firm-fixed price purchase order. This solicitation document incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-89 (7/14/16) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), DPN 8/02/16. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses can be accessed in full text at www.farsite.hill.af.mil. 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors- Commercial Items 52.212-3 Offerors Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items Alternate I 52.225-25, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to IranRepresentation and 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials 252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls 252.203-7996, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements 252.204-7008 Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls 252.204.7011 Alternative Line Item Structure 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror 52.209-5 Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.252-5, Authorized Deviations in Provisions 252.204-7004 Alternate A, System for Award Management 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items 52.212-5 - Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items (June 2016) 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations 52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontracting Sales to the Government 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards 52.209-6 -- Protecting the Governments Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.219-6 -- Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside 52.219-8 -- Utilization of Small Business Concerns 52.219-14 -- Limitations on Subcontracting 52.219-16 -- Liquidated Damages -- Subcontracting Plan 52.219-28 Post-Award Small Business Program Representation 52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract 52.222-3 Convict Labor 52.222-19 Child Labor---Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors. 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim 52.247-34, F.o.b. Destination 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference 52.252-6, Authorized Deviations in Clauses 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials. 252.203-7997 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements 252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting. 252.204-7015, Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support 252.205-7000, Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders 252.209-7004, Subcontracting with Firms that are Owned or Controlled by the Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism 252.225-7012, Preference for Certain Domestic Commodities 252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments. 252.243-7002, Requests for Equitable Adjustment 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items 252.247-7023, Transportation of Supplies by Sea 52.214-3, Amendments to Invitations for Bids 52.214-4, False Statements and Bids 52.214-5, Submission of Bids 52.214-6, Explanation to Prospective Bidders 52.214-7, Late Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Bids 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Representation FAR Clause 52.212-5-Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items applies to acquisition and includes 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)), 52.233-3, Protest After Award (31 U.S.C. 3553), 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (Pub. L. 108-77, 108-78), 52.222-3, Convict Labor E.O. 11755), 52.222-19, Child Labor Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (E.O. 13126), 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Feb 1999), 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity(E.O. 11246), 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases (E.O.'s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury), 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds TransferCentral Contractor Registration (31 U.S.C. 3332), DFARS Clause 252-204-7001, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code Reporting 52.204-6, Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) This RFQ closes on September 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Pacific Daylight Time (PDT). Quotes must be uploaded on the SPAWAR e-commerce website at https://e- commerce.sscno.nmci.navy.mil, under SSC Pacific/Simplified Acquisitions/N66001-16- T- 0480. The point of contact for this solicitation is John McIvers at john.mcivers@navy.mil. Please include RFQ N66001-16- T-0480 on all inquiries. All responding vendors must be registered to the System for Award Management (SAM) website prior to award of contract. Information can be found at https://www.sam.gov/.

Y--IDIQ SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MACC AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS WITHIN THE NAVFAC SOUTHWEST AOR

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published December 3, 2015  -  Deadline December 21, 2015
cpvs

This procurement is for a multiple award construction contract (MACC) and is being advertised as a set aside for Small Business (FAR 52.219-6) concerns. This procurement uses the two-phase design-build selection procedures and consists of one solicitation covering both phases with the intent to award three or more Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) construction contracts to the responsible offerors whose proposals, conforming to the Request for Proposal (RFP), will be most advantageous to the Government resulting in the Best Value, price and other factors considered. This is an IDIQ contract with no pre-established fixed contract prices. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representative, who will issue written task orders to the contractor. Award of task orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The work to be acquired under this solicitation is for new construction, renovation, and repair within the NAICS code listed, primarily by design-build or secondarily by design-bid-build, of commercial and institutional buildings at various government installations located in California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. However, it is anticipated that the majority of the work will be performed in California. Types of projects may include, but are not limited to: administration buildings, armory, auditoriums, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ’s), child care centers, fire stations, gymnasiums, hangars, hospitals, maintenance/repair facilities, warehouses, and other similar facilities. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 236220, and the annual size standard is $36.5 million. The basic contract period will be for 12 months. Each contract contains four (4) 12-month options for a total maximum duration of 60 months. The estimated maximum dollar value, including the base year and all options, for all contracts combined is $240,000,000. Task orders will range between $8,000,000 and $15,000,000. Task orders may fall below or above this limit; however, contractors are not obligated to accept such task orders under the general terms of the contract. The only work authorized under this contract is work ordered by the government through issuance of a task order. The government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or actual amount of work to be ordered, however, during the term of the contract, a minimum of $5,000 is guaranteed to be ordered from each awardee, under the performance period of the contract. Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contract(s) without discussions. Selection for award will be based on evaluation of the following: Phase One: Factor 1 - Technical Approach, Factor 2 - Experience, and Factor 3 - Past Performance; Phase Two: Factor 4 - Safety; Factor 5 - Technical Solution, Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design, and Factor 7 - Price (based on Proposed Task Order 0001). Source Selection procedures will be used and award may be made to the offeror whose proposal is the most advantageous and offers the best value to the government, price and other factors considered. No site visit will be held, and no pre-proposal conference will be conducted. THE SOLICITATION AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT ONLY. The Phase One RFP will be posted on the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website at https://www.neco.navy.mil and on the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website at http://www.fbo.gov on or about December 21, 2015. No hard copies will be provided. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO CHECK THE WEBSITE DAILY FOR ANY AMENDMENTS TO THIS SOLICITATION. Prospective offerors MUST register themselves on the website. Plan holders lists will not be faxed and will be available only at the website address listed above. A sources sought notice was posted on NECO and FBO, and a market survey was conducted that included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement as a small business set-aside. The U. S. Small Business Administration (SBA) San Diego District Office and the NAVFAC SW small business office concur with this decision.

C--LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES A-E IDIQ, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published April 14, 2016  -  Deadline May 17, 2016
cpvs

DESCRIPTION: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECTENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. THIS IS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE PROCUREMENT. A market research study was conducted by NAVFAC Southwest that included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. Upon review of the market research, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) in Los Angeles determined that a Small Business Set-Aside procurement is appropriate. The NAVFAC SW small business office concurs with the SBA determination. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Landscape Architectural Services. Projects under this contract will occur at various military installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah; but may be available to the NAVFAC area of responsibility (AOR) as approved by the NAVFAC Southwest (SW) Chief of Contracting Office (CCO). The preponderance of work is expected to be in southern California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capability to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219-14(b) (1) Limitation on Subcontracting. A-E Design and Engineering Services shall mainly provide for, but not be limited to, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL related services. All A-E services will be in accordance with the scope of this contract, Industry Design Codes and Standards, and Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC); such as Antiterrorism, Energy and Sustainable Design, Safety and Health Requirements criteria. For this contract, the lead discipline shall be a registered Landscape Architect. The number of design task orders per fiscal year may vary and may involve surges of multiple projects with overlapping delivery dates. Primary A-E services required: Preparation of Requests for Proposals (RFP) for Design Build (DB) projects; Design-Bid-Build (DBB) construction contract packages (i.e., full plans and specifications); site Investigations to support new development of facilities on raw land and/or redevelopment of existing facilities on developed sites. Secondary A-E services required: Studies/reports related to the design of new facilities and/or renovation/repair of existing facilities; cost estimates; construction contract support services (CCSS) or post construction award services (PCAS). Support A-E services which may be required: Technical reviews of government-prepared RFP for DB projects and/or full plans and specifications for DBB projects; preparation of planning and programming support documents; horticultural/arboricultural analysis and documentation, landscape architectural expertise in climate areas outside of California; coordination of various technical disciplines, such as, architectural, civil, and environmental. Type of projects may include, but are not limited to, extensive irrigation design, including whole-site water auditing and report preparation and central control design; new construction and renovation/repair of large operational and training, commercial, institutional, industrial, research and development, medical, and quality of life buildings/facilities, recreational areas and parks, golf courses, site re-vegetation and or stabilization areas. The maximum contract value may not exceed $5,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract is $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The minimum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $5,000. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $500,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. Per NFAS 17.208-100(c) (1), options for PCAS may be negotiated on individual task orders for unilateral exercise. The estimated start date is December 2016. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541320 (Landscape Architectural Services) and the annual small business size standard is $7.5 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Firms that provided Architect-Engineer services for a task order issued under the resulting contract are prohibited from participating on the subsequent construction contract. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Selection of Architects and Engineers, formerly the Brooks Act (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Quality Control; and Criterion 7, Volume of Work. Submitted SF330s (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) and related information will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criteria responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and of equal importance to each other; Criteria 3, 4, 5 and 6 are of lesser importance and listed in descending order of importance; and Criterion 7 is of lesser importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among firms considered to be technically equal. Evaluation of past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers may result in a firm being considered less favorably in the evaluation. In evaluating an Offeror’s capability, the Government will consider how well the offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF 330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) shall have been completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF330, Part 1 submission is limited to thirty (30), 8.5”x11” pages (see definition). Information submitted beyond the stated page limitation, unless otherwise accepted, will not be considered in the evaluation. Submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of SF330 (Parts 1 and 2), addressing the selection criteria information below. Requested items not counted as part of the 30-page limitation are as noted herein. Also submit one electronic copy of the complete SF330 on CD (Adobe Acrobat .PDF format). SF330, Part 1, Sections B and C: In Block 5, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the firm’s Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number issued by Dun and Bradstreet Information Services. In Block 9, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the DUNS number of each proposed team member. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to requirements stated in the SF330 Instructions, identify on the submitted organization chart the relationships and lines of authority of the proposed team members, including key sub consultants, including the following: - Name - Firm employed with - Job Title/Role - Licensure, certification, and or accreditation - Permanent geographic location of individual Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions. This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30-page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel, CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: The evaluation will consider the professional qualifications of proposed key personnel (see definition) in providing relevant primary and secondary A-E services for project types identified for this contract. Include the geographic office location of the individual on the resume. All key personnel must be professionally registered/accredited (see definition) in their discipline. The designated Program Manager (see definition) shall be a professionally registered Landscape Architect and be an employee of the prime A-E firm. The prime A-E firm shall have on staff a minimum of one (1) professionally registered Landscape Architect, in addition to the Program Manager, to perform the anticipated work of this contract. Key personnel demonstrating relevant experience with completed projects located in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of proposed key personnel who will specifically perform the relevant primary and secondary A-E services for relevant project types identified for this contract. Non-relevant information will not be considered. Resumes of personnel performing only support services (as listed above) are not required and will not be considered. For each key personnel, indicate highest level of education achieved, number of years engaged in the discipline, and professional registration discipline, state, and number. Submit a copy of the applicable current professional registration/accreditation certificate (personnel with registration in multiple states need only submit a copy from one state). Certificate copies will not be counted in the 30-page limitation. Key personnel resumes shall include, but not be limited to, individuals who will perform the functions of Program Manager, Design Quality Control Manager (DCQM), Sustainable Design Manager, and at least one (1) professionally registered Landscape Architect that is on the staff of the prime A-E firm. See definitions at the end of this notice for registration and experience requirements. Resumes of these individuals shall demonstrate their depth of experience in their respective roles. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific recently completed projects that best demonstrate the individual’s qualifications in performing the relevant primary and secondary A-E services listed for this contract. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. Submit only projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. Submit a brief description of the project within SF330, Section E, Block 19. For each project describe: 1) Scope and cost; 2) Role and responsibilities of the key personnel; and 3) The specific A-E services performed by the individual that are relevant to the primary and secondary services required by this contract. Identifying only the individual’s job title will not provide sufficient information to determine their specific experience as it relates to services to be performed under this contract. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project (see definitions), as is a standalone contract award. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example of a completed project. Instead, list relevant completed task orders or stand-alone contract awards. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated. For purposes of this evaluation, “recent” is defined as professional services completed during the period of May 17, 2011 through May 17, 2016. Projects must be complete as of the SF330 due date. “Completion” is defined as the date that the final design or design-build package was completed, or the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, and does not include construction support services. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered to demonstrate recent experience. SF330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: The evaluation will consider specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team relative to the primary and secondary A-E services for project types identified for this contract. The evaluation will place more emphasis on experience in primary services. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Relevant projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Firms that demonstrate relevant experience with preparation of Request for Proposal for Design-Build project(s) may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a maximum of ten (10) recently completed projects (see definitions) that best demonstrate the overall team experience in performing the primary and secondary A-E services for project types identified for this contract. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. Projects shall have been performed by the office(s)/branch(es) identified in SF330, Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm named in the SF330 Part I, Section F, Block 25. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. In SF330, Part 1, Section F, Block 24, submit a description of the project, including: 1) Type of project and its relevance to the scope of this contract; 2) Specific relevant A-E services performed by the firm; 3) Construction cost; 4) Relevant sustainable features (see definition) incorporated in the project (if none or if not applicable to the project, affirmatively state so). For projects with LEED or equivalent sustainability certification, submit copies of the certificate or other supporting documentation (not counted in the 30-page limitation); 5) A-E fees for the project; and 6) Percentage of work self-performed by the prime A-E firm. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office(s)/branch(es) performed the A-E services. Additional requirements: - At least two (2) projects shall demonstrate relevant experience with projects having professional fees of $50,000 or greater and be self-performed by the prime A-E firm. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting, Self-Performance for A-E services is defined as the prime A-E firm having performed at least 50% of the contract performance for personnel for the project, with personnel from the prime A-E firm. - At least three (3) projects shall demonstrate relevant experience with projects that are primarily landscape architecture design scope (primary element in the project construction cost). - At least two (2) projects shall demonstrate relevant landscape design experience using regionally native plants/vegetation. Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project (see definitions), as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example of a completed project. Instead, list relevant completed task orders or stand-alone contract awards. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated. “Recent” is defined as professional services completed during the period of May 17, 2011 through May 17, 2016. Projects must be complete as of the SF330 due date. “Completion” is defined as the date that the final design or design-build package was completed, or the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, and does not include construction support services. Projects not meeting the above requirements will not be considered. If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), submit information for relevant projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for each of the JV partners. In any case, do not exceed the ten (10) project limitation. In cases where the submitted project was performed by a JV, but all JV partners for that project are not on the team identified in Part I, Section C, specifically describe the relevant work performed by the JV partner(s) proposed for this contract. In all cases, clearly describe the specific relevant work self-performed by the proposing firm and the firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project; do not include work that is not attributable to the proposing firm. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project may not be considered. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H; Additional Information requested by Agency: Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 7; additional sheets may be used up to the 30 page limitation for Part 1, if required. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s capacity to accomplish the work in the required time and the capability to self-perform at least 50% of the contract value with in-house staffing. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm’s capacity to accomplish work in the required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload and capability to integrate work under this contract with other work; 2) Methodology the prime A-E firm will use to execute a minimum of 50% of the contract value with in-house personnel; 3) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 4) Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously with overlapping dates; and 5) Strategy to meet surges in unexpected workload demand. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s past performance on relevant Government and/or commercial projects regarding quality of work, cost control, compliance with performance schedules, and customer satisfaction, with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. The evaluation will be based on past performance assessments and other available past performance information. Points of contact provided in the proposal may be contacted. Where there is no record of past performance, the proposal will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative to demonstrate Offeror’s past performance in effective project cost control: 1) Describe the firm’s cost estimating procedures and project cost control methods. Note: this refers to estimating and controlling the cost of the construction, and does not refer to the labor cost of performing the design services; and 2) Provide budget amounts, final construction cost estimates, and actual construction contract award amounts for at least five (5) projects submitted Section F. Explain any differences between estimated and actual costs. For projects provided as experience in Section F, list and provide copies of any applicable design awards received (not counted in the 30-page limitation). Clearly indicate to which Section F project the award applies; otherwise the information may not be considered. Submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS), Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), or a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluation for each project submitted under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. If a PPQ is submitted, but an official ACASS/CPARS evaluation is found for that project in government databases, the official evaluation will take precedence. If an ACASS/CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the A-E is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the A-E should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. A-Es should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.JP, Attn: Jane Pamintuan, via email at jane.pamintuan@navy.mil, prior to the response date. A-Es shall not incorporate by reference into their response ACASS/CPARS or PPQ evaluations previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS/CPARS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document(s). CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: The evaluation will consider the team’s location, demonstrated knowledge of and project experience within the geographic areas where projects are anticipated for this contract. The preponderance of the work will be at Navy and Marine Corps installations in southern California. Prime AE firms with a local office in southern California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the team’s knowledge of and project experience within the geographic locations for anticipated projects on this contract. Include: 1) Location of the Offeror’s main office and any branch offices and subcontractor offices that will be utilized for this contract; 2) Description of team’s knowledge of, and project experience within, the targeted geographic areas; and 3) Description of team’s availability and ability to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support at Government installations throughout the NAVFAC SW AOR. CRITERION 6, QUALITY CONTROL: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s Design Quality Control (DQC) program for ensuring technical accuracy of the A-E work product and effective cross-coordination among various design disciplines. Firm’s that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the government’s quality assurance (QA) effort in reviewing the A-E’s work product may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirement: Submit a narrative that describes the DQC program that the prime A-E firm uses to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) Offeror’s QC program that is used to ensure technical accuracy, effective coordination, and consistency of the A-E’s work product across all disciplines (including subcontractors); and 2) Process used for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents; tracking changes and incorporating review comments. For offerors who are joint ventures and/or teams with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices. CRITERION 7, VOLUME OF WORK: The evaluation will consider the volume of DoD work awarded to the prime A-E in the past 12 months with the objective of equitably distributing contracts among A-E firms, including minority-owned firms and firms without prior DoD contracts. Submission Requirements: State the dollar amount of work previously awarded to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime by DOD in the past 12 months. Joint Ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for the time period. Do not include work performed as a Subcontractor. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in their SF 330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. Note that joint ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of their JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the submitted SF 330 package (cover letter, attachments, and excess information beyond the 30-page limit, unless otherwise excepted, will not be considered in the evaluation). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: In accordance with FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management Registration, ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers (formerly the Brooks Act), the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture and/or Engineering, i.e., State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. Firms will be required to submit proof of required professional A-E registration/licensure prior to the interview phase of the selection process. This documentation is not counted as part of the 30-page limitation. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. The submittal package (original, plus 3 copies and 1 CD) shall be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Jane Pamintuan,, Code RAQ20.JP, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Time on May 17, 2016. Facsimile and emailed SF330 packages will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF330 package when delivery is delayed until the last few minutes before the deadline. Offerors intending to deliver the SF330 package in-person are cautioned that the NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the Offeror allow for delays driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossings, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF330s is available at the Government facility. SF330s shall be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for mailroom personnel to receive and time stamp the SF330. The stamp time is determined by the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp device only, not by any other time keeping device that the Offeror may use or own. Immediately upon proposal delivery, the Offeror shall leave the premises of the Government facility. An Offeror that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries via email: jane.pamintuan@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-4514. *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT *** DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: SEE ATTACHMENT SYNOPSIS DOCUMENT

Upgrade to Oracle E-Business R12

Department of the Air Force, Direct Reporting Unit - AFSVA/SVC | Published April 8, 2015  -  Deadline April 30, 2015
cpvs

This Request for Quotation (RFQ) is issued by the Air Force Nonappropriated Fund Purchasing Office (AFNAFPO). All requirements, solicitations, and subsequent contracts, if any, awarded through AFNAFPO are funded wholly with Nonappropriated Funds (NAF). These funds are generated through Air Force Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) programs worldwide. THEY ARE NOT APPROPRIATIONS FROM CONGRESS OR "TAXPAYER" DOLLARS. The overall objective of this initiative is to provide functional and technical support to upgrade the current version of Oracle on the Air Force Services Financial Management System (AFSFMS) to Oracle R12. The objective of this RFQ is to award a single, firm fixed price contract for work to be completed within one (1) year or less to the offeror who provides the solution that yields the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) quote with acceptable past performance. The successful Offeror must be able to meet and implement all requirements outlined in this solicitation and the Statement of Work (Attachment 2). 1. The following RFQ documentation must be submitted for consideration for award. Please ensure all requested documentation is submitted on time. a. Complete blocks, 6, 7, and 10-16 of the Nonappropriated Fund Request for Quotation Form b. Technical Solution to include: Narrative, Qualifications Matrix and Resumes (to include a sample test plan). Narrative shall outline offeror's completed understanding of the requirement and how contractor will fulfill all requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). c. Completed Representations and Certifications. d. Confirmation of acceptance or non-acceptance of NAF General Provisions. e. Two (2) references with narratives outlining completion of similar efforts matching the size and scope of this requirement. 2. The NAFI will evaluate the quotes based on the technical responses, price and past performance respectively. 3. Quotes must be received by the Contracting Officer NO LATER THAN 4 p.m. CST Thursday, 30 April 2015. Incomplete quotes impede the evaluation process and WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 4. Quotes in response to this RFQ should be mailed to the address below using only carriers such as FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc. The US Postal Service WILL NOT deliver to this address, therefore; quotations sent via US Postal Service WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Electronic submissions WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. The physical address to submit quotes via FedEx; UPS. DHL; etc. is: AFSVA/SVCS ATTN: Cedric K. Henson (210-395-7879) Bldg 171 3515 South General McMullen San Antonio, TX 78226 NOTE: Please pay special attention to the physical address. AFNAFPO is not responsible for quotes not received due to Offeror utilizing the incorrect address. Late quotes sent to the incorrect address WILL NOT evaluated for award. 5. Questions regarding the RFQ must be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer by: 4:00 PM, CST, Wednesday, 15 April 2015. Questions shall be submitted via email to: AFSVASVCBusinessOperations@us.af.mil. 6. The Contracting Officer will respond to all questions received in a timely manner no later than 4:00 PM, CST, Wednesday, 22 April 2015. All questions & answers will be posted on http://www.fbo.gov. 7. Questions regarding this procurement must be directed to the Contracting Specialist with a copy to the Contracting Officer. Valerie Baltimore, the Contract Specialist, may be reached at 210-395-7879; valerie.baltimore@us.af.mil and I may be reached at 210-395-7853

A-E IDIQ MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMPING (MEP) ENGINEERING SERVICES, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 5, 2014  -  Deadline March 11, 2014
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This is Small Business Set-Aside. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. The preponderance of the work will be in Southern California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capable to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting. A-E Design and Engineering Services shall mainly provide for, but not be limited to, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING related services. All A-E services will be in accordance with the scope of this contract, applicable references, and Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). For this contract, the lead discipline shall be a registered Mechanical or Electrical Engineer. Primary A-E services will include, but are not limited to, preparation of Requests for Proposals (RFP) for Design Build (DB) projects; Design-Bid-Build (DBB) construction contract packages (i.e., drawings, specifications, basis of design, design analysis, engineering calculations, cost estimate, etc.); Site Investigations / Studies / Surveys; Reports from studies, surveys and/or site investigations; design and construction quality control support services; addressing constructability issues, such as, phasing of work in occupied and unoccupied facilities and disruption of both utilities and operations of the site and building occupants during construction. Secondary A-E services include technical reviews of Government prepared RFP package for DB projects and Government prepared design documents for DBB projects; antiterrorism; Post Construction Award Services (PCAS); Fire Protection Engineering Designs, Studies, Surveys and Site Investigation; fire risk/hazard analysis; life safety code analysis; fire modeling and engineering documentation; and final inspections and tests of installed Fire Protection Systems. Fire Protection surveys shall be conducted within the guidelines established by OPNAVINST 11320.23F. Support services may include incidental architectural, fire protection, civil, geotechnical, environmental, and structural work as well as identification and abatement methods of existing asbestos containing materials, lead-based paint and other hazardous materials. Primary type of projects will include, but is not limited to, Energy Master Planning; Commissioning; Retro-commissioning; Life Cycle Cost; Solar systems and cogeneration; LEED, and Title 24 Energy Compliance documents; new installation or repair/renovation of heating, ventilation, air conditioning and control systems; direct digital control schematic and architecture; exhaust systems; above and below ground steam distribution; high temperature/pressure water; refrigeration systems; natural gas (including earthquake shut off valves); water (including backflow preventer); plumbing systems; building electric power; communication; cable TV; electronic security; fire alarm; and lighting systems for operational and training, commercial, institutional, industrial, research development, and quality of life facilities. Secondary type of projects include industrial ventilation; compressed air; medical gas; oxygen; acetylene lubricant; fuel pumping distribution systems; sprinkler system; fire alarm and detection systems; and fire resistant building assemblies. The maximum contract value may not exceed $30,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The minimum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $200,000. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $2,500,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. Per NFAS 17.208-100(c) (1), options for post construction award services may be negotiated on individual task orders for unilateral exercise. The estimated start date is October, 2014. This procurement is Small Business Set-Aside. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541330 (Engineering Services) and the annual small business size standard is $14 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Firms that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract or task order issued under the resulting contract are prohibited from providing the subsequent construction. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Brooks Act (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Quality Control; and Criterion 7, Volume of Work. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criterion responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 3, 4, 5, and 6 are slightly less important and listed in descending order of importance; and Criteria 7 is of lesser importance and will be used as tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. In evaluating an Offeror's capability, the Government shall consider how well the offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF 330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF 330 Part 1 is limited to 30, 8.5"x11" single-sided pages. Minimum font size is 10. Submit the following: a) One (1) original and two (2) copies of the SF 330 for the prime offeror (which also includes a completed Part II for the firm and key subcontractors) addressing the following selection criterion information; and b) one compact disk copy, in Adobe Acrobat format, of the complete SF330 being submitted by the firm. The organization chart, A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluations shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation SF330, Part 1, Section B: Contract Information: In Block 5, list firm's Dun and Bradstreet Number in addition to the name of the firm. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF 330, (i.e. the names and roles of all key personnel in this contract/solicitation and the firm they are associated with), identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subcontractors. (Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions.) This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF 330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel; CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the proposed team members assigned to this contract in A-E services including the preparation of the required primary and secondary services in the types of projects specified shall be evaluated. The prime A-E firm shall have on staff a minimum of one Registered Mechanical and one Registered Electrical Engineers to perform the work anticipated under this contract. In addition the proposed team shall include one Certified Commissioning Agent, one LEED Accredited Professional (AP) and one Registered Fire Protection Engineer. The Project Lead shall be a registered Mechanical or Electrical Engineer and be an employee of the prime A-E firm under this contract. The primary member responsible for Sustainable Design shall be a LEED AP. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of each proposed team member who will specifically perform the primary and secondary services for the type of projects listed above. Resumes of personnel performing only support services (as listed above) are not required and will not be reviewed. All key personnel must be professionally registered/accredited in their discipline; include the discipline, state, license number and the expiration date of registration. Provide the level of education achieved and the number of years engaged in the discipline. Identify the primary key personnel responsible for the Quality Control (QC) program and the primary LEED AP key personnel responsible for sustainable design. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific, recently completed projects, within the scope of projects anticipated for this contract, that best illustrate the individual member's qualifications in performing the listed primary and secondary A-E services. Resumes for the Quality Control and Sustainable Design personnel shall demonstrate their experience in that role for MEP projects. A specific project is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. "Recent" is defined as professional services (100% plans and specifications signed off by an Architect-Engineer and ready for construction with final cost estimate. Does not include any Post Construction Award Support (PCAS)) completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (03/11/2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. Submit projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. Submit a brief description of the project within block 19 of the SF330, Section E requirement. In addition, clearly address key elements for each project by describing: 1) The role and responsibilities of the key personnel in the project; and 2) The specific MEP engineering services performed by the key personnel in the project. SF 330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team members assigned to this project experienced in the preparation of the required primary and secondary services in the types of projects specified shall be evaluated. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a maximum of ten (10) specific, recently completed projects with an A-E fee within the task order range identified above, that best illustrate overall team experience in the required primary and secondary services in the types of MEP engineering projects listed above. A specific project is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. "Recent" is defined as professional services (100% plans and specifications signed off by an Architect-Engineer and ready for construction with final cost estimate. Does not include any Post Construction Award Support (PCAS)) completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (03/11/2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects shall have been performed by the office(s) (main or branch) identified in Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. Submit a brief but explicit description of the project, project's relevance to the contract, and the A-E fee within block 24 of SF330, Section F. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office performed the services. In addition: - Submit at least one project demonstrating self-performance experience of a complete building retro-commissioning including Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems. - Submit at least one project demonstrating self-performance design experience with Digital Direct Controls or Energy Management Control Systems schematic and architecture. - Submit at least one project demonstrating self-performance experience in the production of a Design-Bid-Build (DBB) construction contract packages (i.e., drawings, specifications, basis of design, design analysis, engineering calculations, cost estimate, etc.). If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner, while ensuring you do not exceed the maximum of ten (10) projects for the proposed team. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and all joint venture partners are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF 330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 7; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total pages for Part 1, if required. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates firm's capacity to accomplish work in required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload; 2) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 3) Ability to perform the work to schedules; 4) Capacity to accomplish multiple, large and small tasks simultaneously; 5) Available specialized equipment; 6) Key personnel and team members' current and/or prior security clearances. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance with relevant contracts/projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, compliance with performance schedules with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. Firms will be evaluated based on past performance assessments and other available information regarding past performance. Points of contact provided in other criteria may be contacted. A proposal with no record of relevant past performance information shall be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Show past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Submit an ACASS or a PPQ evaluation for each project listed under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN AN ACASS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE. If an ACASS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF 330. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the offeror should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.BK, Attn: Betty Kimes, via email at betty.kimes@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQ or ACASS evaluations previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document. For each project provided as experience in Section F, list applicable awards and commendations. Submit a narrative to demonstrate quality of past performance in terms of the effectiveness of the cost control process. Describe the firm's overall cost estimating procedures, and identify the team member(s) who is/are responsible for implementing and monitoring this process. CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: Firm's location within and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographical areas in which projects could be located shall be evaluated. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. The majority of work will be in Southern California. The prime A-E firm with a local office in Southern California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm's knowledge of and experience in the general geographical area of this contract. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) The location of the firm's main offices, branch offices, and sub consultants' offices; 2) The team's knowledge of and availability to work in the geographical area; and 3) Ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support. CRITERION 6, QUALITY CONTROL: Demonstration of the design Quality Control (QC) program used by the firm that ensures technical accuracy and cross coordination among disciplines shall be evaluated. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that minimize the government's effort to QA the A-E's work may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that describes the design QC program used by the firm to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) The QC process the team uses to ensure consistent quality work across the entire team (including subcontractors); and 2) The team's QC processes for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents; tracking, and incorporating review comments. CRITERION 7, VOLUME OF WORK: Volume of DOD work awarded to the firm in past 12 months with objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Provide a list of DOD contracts/task orders awarded in the last 12 months to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. Do not include work performed as a Subcontractor. Include the dollar amount for each DOD contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. Include agency phone numbers and points of contact. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF 330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. Please note Joint Ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of the JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF 330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: Ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov In accordance with the Brooks Act, the AE Firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture or Engineering, i.e. State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm's licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. Architect-Engineer firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. One copy of the submittal package (original, plus 2 copies and 1 CD) is to be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Betty Kimes, Code RAQ20.BK 1220 Pacific Highway , San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time on TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2014, in order to be considered. Facsimile and emailed SF 330's will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. It is an Offeror's responsibility to deliver its SF 330 to the proper place at the proper time which includes allowing a reasonable amount of time for the delivery of the SF 330 (FAR 15.208(a)). Offerors shall ensure that SF 330s are mailed or sent by courier in a timely manner to be delivered to the NAVFAC Southwest facility no later than the date and time stated in this notice. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF 330 when it delays delivering its SF 330 until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of SF 330s. Offerors intending to deliver the SF 330 in person to the facility at the address above are cautioned that this NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the Offeror allows for delays in driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossing, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF 330s is available at the Government facility. SF 330s are to be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for the person in the mailroom to receive and time stamp the SF 330. The stamp time is determined from the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp and not any other time keeping equipment that the Offeror may own. Immediately upon SF 330 delivery the Offeror shall leave the Government facility. An Offeror that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the offeror's responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries via email: betty.kimes@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-4261 *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT ***

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard intends to solicit for the Long-Term Rental of Efficiency Suites in the San Diego, CA area (5 rooms/day, 365 days totaling 1,825 room days) from 9/20/16-9/19/17. This will be a 100% Small Business Set-Aside under NAICS 721110

Department of the Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command | Published July 25, 2016  -  Deadline July 29, 2016
cpvs

PNS intends to solicit for the long-term rental of Efficiency Suites in the Naval Base Point Loma (NBPL), San Diego, CA area (5 rooms per day, 365 days/ea totaling 1,825 room days). The period of performance is 09/20/2016 - 09/19/2017. This procurement will be a 100% Small Business Set-Aside action under NAICS 721110. Detailed specifications and solicitation documents will be provided shortly.

C--FACILITY PLANNING SERVICES, ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY, NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SOUTHWEST, SAN DIEGO, SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published October 23, 2015  -  Deadline November 24, 2015
cpvs

DESCRIPTION: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. THIS IS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE PROCUREMENT. A market research study was conducted by NAVFAC Southwest that included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. Upon review of the market research, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) in San Diego determined that a Small Business Set-Aside procurement is appropriate. The NAVFAC SW small business office concurs with the SBA determination. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Facility Planning Services. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other government installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. Projects could also be located at other Navy and Marine Corps facilities and government installations in the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii, as approved by the NAVFAC SW Procuring Contracting Officer. The preponderance of work is expected to be in Southern California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capable to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219.14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting. Required A-E services are for, but not limited to: 1. PRIMARY A-E services PROJECT PLANNING DOCUMENTS: Military Construction (MILCON) and Special Project planning documentation (DD Form 1391) using Electronic Project Generator (EPG); demolition / footprint reduction; preliminary and parametric cost estimates; life cycle analysis; economic analyses (using the latest version of the Government’s ECONPACK software); site approvals (ordnance, explosive safety, etc.); Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP); Asset Evaluations (AE); Basic Facilities Requirements (BFR) documentation; Facilities Planning Documents (FPD) using the government’s web-based iNFADS program. 2. SECONDARY A-E services A. SUSTAINABILITY MASTER PLANNING: Local and regional planning to include sustainable urbanism, healthy community planning, campus planning, form-based planning, energy and renewable master planning, transportation planning, landscape architecture, water conservation planning, and electronic/web-based master planning and other planning documents which incorporate sustainability principles such as those outlined in UFC 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning. B. GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION and SERVICE: The preparation of Geo-Spatial Data services includes: a) spatial and non-spatial data acquisition; loading data into enterprise GIS database systems in accordance with current spatial data standards (SDSFIE 3x); b) preparation of maps, datasets, data models, geo-processing models, automation scripts utilizing Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat, Oracle, AutoCAD, ESRI ArcGIS Product Suite; and c) GPS services which include the collection of global positioning system (GPS) data using GPS equipment compatible with the NAVFAC SW Geo-Readiness Center (GRC). 3. SUPPORT A-E services: OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES include: renewable energy research and or studies; architectural studies; civil engineering studies; land surveying and topographic mapping; and hazardous materials test and abatement studies. These services are in support of Project Planning Documents and Sustainable Master Planning as described above. The maximum contract value may not exceed $30,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The minimum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $150,000. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $1,500,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. The estimated start date is June 2016. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541320 (Landscape Architectural Services) and the annual small business size standard is $7.5 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Selection of Architects and Engineers, formerly the Brooks Act (PL 92-582), and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Sustainable Design; Criterion 7, Quality Control; and Criterion 8, Volume of Work. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criterion responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are slightly less important and listed in descending order of importance; and Criteria 8 is of lesser importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Evaluation of past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. In evaluating an Offeror’s capability, the Government shall consider how well the offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF 330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must have been completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF 330 Part 1 is limited to 30, 8.5”x11” single-sided pages. Information submitted beyond the stated page limitation, unless otherwise accepted, will not be considered in the evaluation. Submit one (1) original and two (2) copies of SF330 (Parts 1 and 2), addressing the selection criteria information below. Requested items not counted as part of the 30-page limitation are as noted herein. Also submit one electronic copy of the complete SF330 on CD (Adobe Acrobat .PDF format). SF330, Part 1, Section B: In Block 5, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the firm’s Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number issued by Dun and Bradstreet Information Services. In Block 9, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the DUNS number of each proposed team member. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF 330, identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subcontractors, including the following: -Name -Firm employed with -Job Title -Licensure, certification, and or accreditation -Permanent geographic location of individual Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level support positions. This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF 330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel, CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: The evaluation will consider the professional qualifications of proposed key personnel in providing relevant primary and secondary A-E services. Include the geographic office location of the individual on the resume. The Prime firm must have at least one Planner on staff in the Prime’s office where the majority of the work will be performed that is certified by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and another (or the same) staff member in the Prime’s Office where the majority of the work will be performed accredited as a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Associate (GA) or Accredited Professional by the US Green Building Council (USGBC). Key personnel demonstrating relevant experience within the NAVFAC SW AOR may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of proposed key personnel who will specifically perform the relevant primary and secondary A-E services for relevant project types listed for this contract. Non-relevant information will not be considered. Resumes of personnel performing only support services (as listed above) are not required and will not be considered. For each key personnel, indicate highest level of education achieved, number of years engaged in the discipline, and submit a copy of the applicable current professional registration/accreditation certificate (personnel with registration in multiple states need only submit a copy from one state). Certificate copies will not be counted in the 30-page limitation. At least one (1) of the key personnel shall be a professionally registered planner certified by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and be on staff of the Prime A-E firm. At least one (1) of the key personnel shall be a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Associate (GA) or Accredited Professional (AP) by the US Green Building Council (USGBC) and be on staff of the Prime A-E firm. Each resume shall include a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) specific, recently completed projects, within the scope of projects anticipated for this contract, that best illustrate the individual member’s qualifications in performing the required A-E services. A specific project is a single project or a single task order under an indefinite quantity contract or on-call type contract. “Recent” is defined as professional A-E services completed within the past five (5) years prior to the SF330 due date. State the cost of the project as cost of work that is done by the A-E firm. Submit projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. Submit a brief description of the project within block 19 of the SF330, Section E requirement. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) The role and responsibilities of the individual in the project; and 2) The specific A-E services performed by the individual in the project. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. SF 330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: The evaluation will consider specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team relative to the primary and secondary A-E services indicated for this contract. The evaluation will place more emphasis on projects involving the Primary Services listed in the required A-E services. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Projects completed in the NAVFAC SW AOR may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a minimum of five (5) and a maximum of ten (10) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate overall team experience in the required A-E services listed above. At least three (3) of the projects shall have both a minimum A-E fee of $500,000 and be self-performed by the Prime A-E firm. A specific project is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. “Recent” is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date. Projects shall have been performed by the office(s) (main or branch) identified in Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. Submit a brief description of the project within block 24 of SF330, Section F. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office performed the services. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) Specific required A-E services performed by the firm; and 2) Sustainable features incorporated in the project. If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner, while ensuring you do not exceed the maximum of ten (10) projects for the proposed team. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and all joint venture partners are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF 330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a minimum of five (5) and a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 8; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total pages for Part 1. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s capacity to accomplish the work in the required time and the capability to self-perform at least 50% of the contract value with in-house staffing. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm’s capacity to accomplish work in the required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload and capability to integrate work under this contract with other work; 2) Methodology the prime A-E firm will use to execute a minimum of 50% of the contract value with in-house personnel; 3) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 4) Capacity to accomplish multiple large task orders simultaneously; 5) Strategy to meet surges in unexpected workload demand. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s past performance on relevant Government and/or commercial projects regarding quality of work, cost control, compliance with performance schedules, and customer satisfaction, with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. The evaluation will be based on past performance assessments and other available past performance information. Points of contact provided in the proposal may be contacted. Where there is no record of past performance, the proposal will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS), Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), or a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluation for each project submitted under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. If a PPQ is submitted, but an official ACASS/CPARS evaluation is found for that project in government databases, the official evaluation will take precedence. If an ACASS/CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the A-E is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the A-E should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. A-Es should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.HH, Attn: Hal Hayes, via email at harold.hayes@navy.mil, prior to the response date. A-Es shall not incorporate by reference into their response ACASS/CPARS or PPQ evaluations previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS/CPARS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document(s). CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: The evaluation will consider the team’s location, demonstrated knowledge of, and project experience within, the geographic areas where projects are anticipated for this contract. The preponderance of the work will be at Government installations in southern California. Prime A-E firms with a local office in southern California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the team’s knowledge of and project experience within the geographic locations for anticipated projects on this contract. Include: 1) Location of the Offeror’s main office and any branch offices and subcontractor offices that will be utilized for this contract; 2) Description of team’s knowledge of, and project experience within, the targeted geographic areas; and 3) Description of team’s ability to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support at Government installations throughout the NAVFAC SW AOR. Firms with a main office outside Southern California shall address how they would effectively communicate, collaborate, and share data with clients and subcontractors. CRITERION 6, SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s demonstrated success and knowledge in sustainable design and sustainable urbanism. Submission Requirements: Describe the team’s knowledge of and experience with incorporating sustainable design features into projects. Address the use of recovered materials, renewable energy, and sustainable principles and concepts, particularly related to site design. Address participation in new urbanist projects such as transit-oriented development, mixed-use development, traditional neighborhood development, designs for walkability, and adherence to the principles outlined in both the Charter of the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND). Describe any projects that have been certified by the LEED program or other similar programs. CRITERION 7, QUALITY CONTROL: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s Quality Control (QC) program for ensuring technical accuracy of the A-E work product and effective cross-coordination among various disciplines. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the government’s quality assurance (QA) effort in reviewing the A-E’s work product may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that describes the QC program used by the firm to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) The QC process the team uses to ensure consistent quality work across the entire team (including subcontractors); and 2) The team’s QC processes for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents; tracking, and incorporating review comments. CRITERION 8, VOLUME OF WORK: The evaluation will consider the volume of DOD work awarded to the firm in the past 12 months with the objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority-owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts. Submission Requirements: State the dollar amount of work previously awarded to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime by DOD in the past 12 months. Joint Ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for the time period. Do not include work performed as a Subcontractor. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF 330 submittal. Please note Joint Ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of the JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF 330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: In accordance with FAR 52.204-99, System for Award Management Registration, ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers statute (formerly the Brooks Act), the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture and/or Engineering, i.e., State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. Firms will be required to submit proof of required professional A-E registration/licensure prior to the interview phase of the selection process. This documentation is not counted as part of the 30-page limitation. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. The submittal package (original, plus 2 copies and 1 CD) shall be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Harold Hayes, Code RAQ20.HH, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2015. Facsimile and emailed SF330 packages will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. A firm risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF330 package when delivery is delayed until the last few minutes before the deadline. Firms intending to deliver the SF330 package in-person are cautioned that the NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the firm allow for delays driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossings, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF330s is available at the Government facility. SF330s shall be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for mailroom personnel to receive and time stamp the SF330. The stamp time is determined by the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp device only, not by any other time keeping device that the proposing firm may use or own. Immediately upon proposal delivery, the A-E firm representatives shall leave the premises of the Government facility. A firm that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries via email: harold.hayes@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-1251. *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT ***

C--Planning Services Architect-Engineer (A-E) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Southwest, San Diego, CA, Small Business Set-Aside

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published July 19, 2016  -  Deadline August 18, 2016
cpvs

DESCRIPTION: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. THIS IS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE PROCUREMENT. A market research study was conducted by NAVFAC Southwest that included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. Upon review of the market research, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) in San Diego determined that a Small Business Set-Aside procurement is appropriate. The NAVFAC SW small business office concurs with the SBA determination. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a Firm Fixed-Price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Planning Services. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other government installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah; but may be available to the NAVFAC area of responsibility (AOR) as approved by the NAVFAC Southwest (SW) Chief of Contracting Office (CCO). The preponderance of work is expected to be in Southern California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capable to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting. Required A-E services are for, but not limited to: 1. PRIMARY A-E services SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING: Regional, installation and area development planning, to include vision plans, illustrative plans, district plans, land use plans, regulating plans, circulation and parking plans, green infrastructure plans (open space and sustainable development), renewable energy plans, primary utility network plans (including utility locations and capacity), future development plans, installation-wide planning and design standards, installation development programs (capital investment plans), electronic/web-based master planning; and other planning documents which incorporate sustainability principles such those outlined in UFC 2-100-01, Installation Master Planning. 2. SECONDARY A-E services A. PROJECT PLANNING DOCUMENTS: Military Construction (MILCON) and Special Project planning documentation (DD Form 1391) using Electronic Project Generator (EPG); demolition / footprint reduction; preliminary and parametric cost estimates; life cycle analysis; economic analyses (using the latest version of the Government’s ECONPACK software); site approvals (ordnance, explosive safety, etc.); Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP); Navy Asset Evaluations (AE); Marine Corps Asset Audits; Basic Facilities Requirements (BFR) documentation; Facilities Planning Documents (FPD) using the government’s web-based internet Naval Facilities Asset Data Store (iNFADS) program. B. GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION and SERVICE: The preparation of Geo-Spatial Data services includes: a) spatial and non-spatial data acquisition; loading data into enterprise GIS database systems in accordance with current spatial data standards (SDSFIE 3x); b) preparation of maps, datasets, data models, geo-processing models, automation scripts utilizing Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat, Oracle, AutoCAD, ESRI ArcGIS Product Suite; and c) GPS services which include the collection of global positioning system (GPS) data using GPS equipment compatible with the NAVFAC SW Geo-Readiness Center (GRC). 3. SUPPORT A-E services: OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES include: architectural studies; civil engineering studies; land surveying and topographic mapping; landscape architecture and outdoor water conservation planning; Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) and or Range Air Installation Compatible Use Zones (RAICUZ); and leading group facilitation / charrettes, conducting training for either primary or secondary planning services. These services are limited to use in support of Shore Infrastructure Planning and Project Planning Documents as described above. The maximum contract value may not exceed $15,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The minimum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $10,000. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $750,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. The estimated start date is February 2017. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541320 (Landscape Architectural Services) and the annual small business size standard is $7.5 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The Selection of Architects and Engineers, formerly the Brooks Act (PL 92-582), and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Sustainable Design; Criterion 7, Quality Control; and Criterion 8, Volume of Work. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criterion responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are slightly less important and listed in descending order of importance; and Criteria 8 is of lesser importance and will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Evaluation of past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. In evaluating an Offeror’s capability, the Government shall consider how well the offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF 330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must have been completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF 330 Part 1 is limited to 30, 8.5”x11” single-sided pages. Information submitted beyond the stated page limitation, unless otherwise accepted, will not be considered in the evaluation. Submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of SF330 (Parts 1 and 2), addressing the selection criteria information below. Requested items not counted as part of the 30-page limitation are as noted herein. Also submit one electronic copy of the complete SF330 on CD (Adobe Acrobat .PDF format). SF330, Part 1, Section B: In Block 5, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the firm’s Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number issued by Dun and Bradstreet Information Services. In Block 9, in addition to the name of the firm, provide the DUNS number of each proposed team member. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF 330, identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subcontractors, including the following: -Name -Firm employed with -Job Title -Licensure, certification, and or accreditation -Permanent geographic location of individual Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level support positions. This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF 330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel, CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: The evaluation will consider the professional qualifications of proposed key personnel in providing relevant primary and secondary A-E services. Include the geographic office location of the individual on the resume. The Prime firm must have at least one Planner on staff in the Prime’s office where the majority of the work will be performed that is certified by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and another (or the same) staff member in the Prime’s Office where the majority of the work will be performed accredited as a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Associate (GA) or Accredited Professional by the US Green Building Council (USGBC). Key personnel demonstrating relevant experience within the NAVFAC SW AOR may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of proposed key personnel who will specifically perform the relevant primary and secondary A-E services for relevant project types listed for this contract. Non-relevant information will not be considered. Resumes of personnel performing only support services (as listed above) are not required and will not be considered. For each key personnel, indicate highest level of education achieved, number of years engaged in the discipline, and submit a copy of the applicable current professional registration/accreditation certificate (personnel with registration in multiple states need only submit a copy from one state). Certificate copies will not be counted in the 30-page limitation. Key personnel shall include, but not be limited to, at least one (1) professionally registered planner certified by the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and be on staff of the Prime A-E firm. At least one (1) of the key personnel shall be a Sustainable Design Manager and shall be a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Associate (GA) or Accredited Professional (AP) by the US Green Building Council (USGBC) and be on staff of the Prime A-E firm. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific, recently completed projects, within the scope of projects anticipated for this contract, that best illustrate the individual member’s qualifications in performing the required A-E services. A specific project is a single project or a single task order under an indefinite quantity contract or on-call type contract. “Recent” is defined as professional A-E services completed within the past five (5) years prior to the SF330 due date. State the cost of the project as cost of work that is done by the A-E firm. Submit projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. Submit a brief description of the project within block 19 of the SF330, Section E requirement. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) The role and responsibilities of the individual in the project; and 2) The specific A-E services performed by the individual in the project. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. SF 330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: The evaluation will consider specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team relative to the primary and secondary A-E services indicated for this contract. The evaluation will place more emphasis on projects involving the Primary Services listed in the required A-E services. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Projects completed in the NAVFAC SW AOR may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a maximum of ten (10) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate overall team experience in the required A-E services listed above. At least three (3) of the projects shall have both a minimum A-E fee of $250,000 and be self-performed by the Prime A-E firm. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting, Self-Performance for A-E services is defined as the prime A-E firm having performed at least 50% of the contract performance for personnel for the project, with personnel from the prime A-E firm. At least one (1) of the projects shall have both a minimum A-E fee of $500,000 and be self-performed by the Prime A-E firm. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting, Self-Performance for A-E services is defined as the prime A-E firm having performed at least 50% of the contract performance for personnel for the project, with personnel from the prime A-E firm. A specific project is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. “Recent” is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date. Projects shall have been performed by the office(s) (main or branch) identified in Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. Submit a brief description of the project within block 24 of SF330, Section F. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office performed the services. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) Specific required A-E services performed by the firm; 2) Sustainable features incorporated in the project. For projects with LEED or equivalent sustainability certification, submit copies of the certificate or other supporting documentation (not counted in the 30-page limitation); 3) A-E Fees for the project; and 4) Percentage of work self-performed by the prime A-E firm. If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner, while ensuring you do not exceed the maximum of ten (10) projects for the proposed team. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and all joint venture partners are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF 330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 8; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total pages for Part 1. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s capacity to accomplish the work in the required time and the capability to self-perform at least 50% of the contract value with in-house staffing. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm’s capacity to accomplish work in the required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload and capability to integrate work under this contract with other work; 2) Methodology the prime A-E firm will use to execute a minimum of 50% of the contract value with in-house personnel; 3) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 4) Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously; 5) Strategy to meet surges in unexpected workload demand. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s past performance on relevant Government and/or commercial projects regarding quality of work, cost control, compliance with performance schedules, and customer satisfaction, with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. The evaluation will be based on past performance assessments and other available past performance information. Points of contact provided in the proposal may be contacted. Where there is no record of past performance, the proposal will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS), Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), or a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluation for each project submitted under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. If a PPQ is submitted, but an official ACASS/CPARS evaluation is found for that project in government databases, the official evaluation will take precedence. If an ACASS/CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the A-E is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the AE should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. A-Es should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.HH, Attn: Hal Hayes, via email at harold.hayes@navy.mil, prior to the response date. A-Es shall not incorporate by reference into their response ACASS/CPARS or PPQ evaluations previously submitted in response to other AE services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS/CPARS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document(s). CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: The evaluation will consider the team’s location, demonstrated knowledge of, and project experience within, the geographic areas where projects are anticipated for this contract. The preponderance of the work will be at Government installations in southern California. Prime A-E firms with a local office in southern California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the team’s knowledge of and project experience within the geographic locations for anticipated projects on this contract. Include: 1) Location of the Offeror’s main office and any branch offices and subcontractor offices that will be utilized for this contract; 2) Description of team’s knowledge of, and project experience within, the targeted geographic areas; and 3) Description of team’s ability to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support at Government installations throughout the NAVFAC SW AOR. CRITERION 6, SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s demonstrated success and knowledge in sustainable design and sustainable urbanism. Submission Requirements: Describe the team’s knowledge of and experience with incorporating sustainable design features into projects. Address the use of recovered materials, renewable energy, and sustainable principles and concepts, particularly related to site design. Address participation in new urbanist projects such as transit-oriented development, mixed-use development, traditional neighborhood development, designs for walkability, and adherence to the principles outlined in both the Charter of the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND). Describe any projects that have been certified by the LEED program or other similar programs. For projects with LEED or equivalent sustainability certification, submit copies of the certificate or other supporting documentation (not counted in the 30-page limitation). CRITERION 7, QUALITY CONTROL: The evaluation will consider the Offeror’s Quality Control (QC) program for ensuring technical accuracy of the A-E work product and effective cross-coordination among various disciplines. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the government’s quality assurance (QA) effort in reviewing the A-E’s work product may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that describes the QC program used by the firm to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) The QC process the team uses to ensure consistent quality work across the entire team (including subcontractors); and 2) The team’s QC processes for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents; tracking, and incorporating review comments. CRITERION 8, VOLUME OF WORK: The evaluation will consider the volume of DOD work awarded to the firm in the past 12 months with the objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority-owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts. Submission Requirements: State the dollar amount of work previously awarded to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime by DOD in the past 12 months. Joint Ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for the time period. Do not include work performed as a Subcontractor. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF 330 submittal. Please note Joint Ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of the JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF 330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: In accordance with FAR 52.204-99, System for Award Management Registration, ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers statute (formerly the Brooks Act), the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture and/or Engineering, i.e., State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. This documentation is not counted as part of the 30-page limitation. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. The submittal package (original, plus 3 copies and 1 CD) shall be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Harold Hayes, Code RAQ20.HH, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Time on Thursday, August 18, 2016. Facsimile and emailed SF330 packages will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. A firm risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF330 package when delivery is delayed until the last few minutes before the deadline. Firms intending to deliver the SF330 package in-person are cautioned that the NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the firm allow for delays driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossings, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF330s is available at the Government facility. SF330s shall be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for mailroom personnel to receive and time stamp the SF330. The stamp time is determined by the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp device only, not by any other time keeping device that the proposing firm may use or own. Immediately upon proposal delivery, the A-E firm representatives shall leave the premises of the Government facility. A firm that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF330 DOCUMENTS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries via email: harold.hayes@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-1251. *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT *** DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SYNOPSIS FOR DEFINITIONS OF TERMS

A-E IDIQ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES, SMALL-BUSINESS SET ASIDE, PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 14, 2014  -  Deadline March 19, 2014
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This is a total Small Business Set-Aside. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Structural Engineering Services. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. The preponderance of work will be in Southern and Central California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capable to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting. A-E Design and Engineering Services shall mainly provide for, but not be limited to, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING related facilities. Structural engineering services may involve many types of buildings and structures of various sizes and configurations, as well as high bay structures, long span structures, containment vessels (tanks), weight handling equipment, retaining structures, towers, and bridges. Primary Structural Engineering A-E services are required for preparing: Requests for Proposals (RFP) packages for Design-Build projects; fully designed plans and specifications; structural investigations, studies, evaluations, and recommendations for upgrade of existing facilities; antiterrorism design related to analysis of blast effects and design to prevent progressive collapse; innovative structural system design including seismic base isolation, seismic damping, passive dissipating systems and use of fiber reinforced polymers; and other structural engineering services. Secondary A-E services may be required for: preparation of DD Form 1391 or similar planning and programming related documents; technical reviews of Government prepared RFP packages for Design-Build projects and Government prepared design documents; and construction contract support services (CCSS) or post-construction award services (PCAS). Support services may include: topographic surveying; geotechnical engineering; cost estimating; material testing; corrosion testing; and identification and abatement methods of existing asbestos containing materials, lead-based paint, and other hazardous materials. The maximum contract value may not exceed $10,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $3,500,000; however, the preponderance of task orders will be less than $500,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. Per NFAS 17.208-100(c)(1), options for post construction award services may be negotiated on individual task orders for unilateral exercise. The estimated start date is October 2014. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541330 (Engineering Services) and the annual small business size standard is $14 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Firms that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract or task order issued under the resulting contract are prohibited from providing the subsequent construction. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Brooks Act (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Quality Control; and Criterion 7, Volume of Work. SF330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criterion responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 3, 4, 5, and 6 are slightly less important and listed in descending order of importance; and Criteria 7 is of lesser importance and will be used as tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. In evaluating an Offeror's capability, the Government shall consider how well the Offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF330 Part 1 is limited to 30, 8.5"x11" single-sided pages. Minimum font size is 10. Submit the following: a) One (1) original and two (2) copies of the SF330 for the prime Offeror (which also includes a completed Part II for the firm and key subcontractors) addressing the following selection criterion information; and b) one compact disk copy, in Adobe Acrobat format, of the complete SF330 being submitted by the firm. The organization chart, A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluations shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. SF330, Part 1, Section B: Contract Information: In Block 5, list firm's Dun and Bradstreet Number in addition to the name of the firm. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF330, (i.e. the names and roles of all key personnel in this contract/solicitation and the firm they are associated with), identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subcontractors. (Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions, or individuals not providing primary structural engineering services.) This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel, CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the proposed team members assigned to this contract in preparation of the required primary and secondary structural engineering services shall be evaluated. The evaluation will place more emphasis on qualifications in primary structural engineering services. The evaluation will take into account education, active professional registration(s), and the experience of the design team members. All key personnel must be professionally registered/accredited in their discipline. Key personnel shall include a minimum of three (3) registered professional Civil and/or Structural Engineers on staff of the prime A-E firm to perform the work anticipated under this contract. The Project Lead and Design Quality Control manager shall be registered Civil or Structural Engineers and members of the prime A-E firm. The Lead Structural Engineer shall also be a member of the prime A-E firm, and shall be a registered Structural Engineer (SE) in the state of California or other state which requires 16 hours of structural engineering testing for registration as an SE. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of each proposed team member who will specifically perform the structural engineering services listed above for this contract. Resumes of personnel performing only secondary or support services (as listed above) or providing other than structural engineering services are not required and will not be reviewed. All key personnel must include the state, license number and the expiration date of their professional registration(s). Provide the level of education achieved and the number of years engaged in the discipline. Identify the Project Lead (project manager and main point of contact) and Lead Structural Engineer for the contract. Identify the key personnel responsible for the Design Quality Control (QC) program. Resumes for these key personnel shall demonstrate relevant qualifications/credentials and experience in their respective roles. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate the individual member's qualifications in performing the listed primary and secondary structural engineering services. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. Submit a brief description of the project within block 19 of the SF330, Section E requirement. Submit projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) The role and responsibilities of the individual in the project; and 2) The specific structural engineering services performed by the individual in the project. A "specific project" is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. "Recent" is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (February 2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects must be complete as of the SF330 due date. "Completion" is defined as the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, or the date that the final design or design-build package was completed. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. SF330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team members in the preparation of the required primary and secondary structural engineering services shall be evaluated. The evaluation will place more emphasis on experience in primary services. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a maximum of ten (10) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate overall team experience in the required structural engineering services. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. Projects involving only secondary or support services (as listed above) or providing other than structural engineering services are not required and will not be reviewed. Submit a brief description of the project within block 24 of SF330, Section F. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office performed the services. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) Specific Structural Engineering services performed by the firm; and 2) Sustainable features incorporated in the project (if none or if not applicable to the project, affirmatively state so). A "specific project" is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. "Recent" is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (February 2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects not yet completed will not be evaluated. "Completed" is defined as the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, or the date that the final design or design-build package was completed, and does not include construction contract support services or inspection during construction. Projects shall have been performed by the office(s) (main or branch) identified in Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the JV, information should be submitted for each JV partner, while ensuring you do not exceed the maximum of ten (10) projects for the proposed team. If a project was performed by a JV, and all JV members are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm should specifically address the work performed by the JV member submitting on this contract. Likewise, if the team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly identify the work actually performed by the team member and their roles and responsibilities on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project may not be considered for evaluation. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 7; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total pages for Part 1. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm's capacity to accomplish work in the required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload; and 2) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 3) Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously; and 4) Ability to sustain the loss of key personnel while accomplishing work within the required time limits, to ensure continuity of services and ability to meet surges in unexpected project demands. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance with relevant contracts/projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, compliance with performance schedules with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. Firms will be evaluated based on past performance assessments and other available information regarding past performance. Points of contact provided in other criteria may be contacted. A proposal with no record of relevant past performance information shall be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Show past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) or a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluation for each project listed under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN AN ACASS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE. If an ACASS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the A-E is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the A-E should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. A-Es should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.EP, Attn: Elliott Penetrante, via email at elliott.penetrante@navy.mil, prior to the response date. A-Es shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQ or ACASS evaluations previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document. For each project provided as experience in Section F, list applicable awards and commendations. CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: Firm's location within and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographical areas in which projects could be located shall be evaluated. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. The majority of work will be in Southern and Central California. Prime A-E firms with a local office in the Southern California area may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm's knowledge of and experience in the general geographical area of this contract. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) The location of the firm's main offices, branch offices, and subconsultants' offices; 2) The team's knowledge of and availability to work in the geographical area; and 3) Ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support at installations within the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Operations. CRITERION 6, QUALITY CONTROL: Demonstration of the design Quality Control (QC) program used by the firm that ensures technical accuracy and cross coordination among disciplines shall be evaluated. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the government's effort to perform quality assurance may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that describes the design QC program used by the firm to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) The design QC process the A-E uses to ensure consistent quality work across the entire team (including subcontractors); 2) The prime A-E's specific design QC processes for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents, and processes for tracking and incorporating review comments; and 3) The prime A-E's procedures for ensuring appropriate supervision and review, by a professionally registered structural engineer, of engineering personnel and structural engineering work product. CRITERION 7, VOLUME OF WORK: Volume of DOD work awarded to the firm in past 12 months with objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Provide a list of DOD contracts/task orders awarded in the last 12 months to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. Do not include work performed as a subcontractor. Include the dollar amount for each DOD contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. Include agency phone numbers and points of contact. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. Please note Joint Ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of the JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: Ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E Firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture or Engineering, i.e. State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm's licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. Architect-Engineer firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. One copy of the submittal package (original, plus 2 copies and 1 CD) is to be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Elliott Penetrante, Code RAQ20.EP, 1220 Pacific Highway , San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2014, in order to be considered. Facsimile and emailed SF330's will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. It is an Offeror's responsibility to deliver its SF330 to the proper place at the proper time which includes allowing a reasonable amount of time for the delivery of the SF330 (FAR 15.208(a)). Offerors shall ensure that SF330s are mailed or sent by courier in a timely manner to be delivered to the NAVFAC Southwest facility no later than the date and time stated in this notice. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF330 when it delays delivering its SF330 until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of SF330s. Offerors intending to deliver the SF330 in person to the facility at the address above are cautioned that this NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the Offeror allows for delays in driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossing, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF330s is available at the Government facility. SF330s are to be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for the person in the mailroom to receive and time stamp the SF330. The stamp time is determined from the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp and not any other time keeping equipment that the Offeror may own. Immediately upon SF330 delivery the Offeror shall leave the Government facility. An Offeror that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the Offeror's responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries preferably via email: elliott.penetrante@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-2967. *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT ***

C--A-E IDIQ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES, SMALL-BUSINESS SET ASIDE, PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, COLORADO, NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 10, 2015
cpvs

This is a total Small Business Set-Aside. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for a firm fixed-price Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Structural Engineering Services. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Responsibility (AOR): California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. The preponderance of work will be in Southern and Central California. The Offeror/Contractor must demonstrate adequate in-house staffing capable to self-perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract as required by FAR Clause 52.219-14 (b)(1) Limitation on Subcontracting. A-E Design and Engineering Services shall mainly provide for, but not be limited to, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING related facilities. Structural engineering services may involve many types of buildings and structures of various sizes and configurations, as well as high bay structures, long span structures, containment vessels (tanks), weight handling equipment, retaining structures, towers, and bridges. Primary Structural Engineering A-E services are required for preparing: Requests for Proposals (RFP) packages for Design-Build projects; fully designed plans and specifications; structural investigations, studies, evaluations, and recommendations for upgrade of existing facilities; antiterrorism design related to analysis of blast effects and design to prevent progressive collapse; innovative structural system design including seismic base isolation, seismic damping, passive dissipating systems and use of fiber reinforced polymers; and other structural engineering services. Secondary A-E services may be required for: preparation of DD Form 1391 or similar planning and programming related documents; technical reviews of Government prepared RFP packages for Design-Build projects and Government prepared design documents; and construction contract support services (CCSS) or post-construction award services (PCAS). Support services may include: topographic surveying; geotechnical engineering; cost estimating; material testing; corrosion testing; and identification and abatement methods of existing asbestos containing materials, lead-based paint, and other hazardous materials. The maximum contract value may not exceed $10,000,000 aggregate total. The minimum guarantee for the contract shall be $5,000. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) will be satisfied by the award of the initial task order. The maximum value of individual task orders executed under this contract is $3,500,000; however, the preponderance of task orders will be less than $500,000. There will be no dollar limit per year. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Contract term is for a one-year base period with four option periods. Each performance period will run 365 (366 for leap year) calendar days. The hourly rates will be negotiated for each performance period. The Government may exercise the option period unilaterally. Per NFAS 17.208-100(c)(1), options for post construction award services may be negotiated on individual task orders for unilateral exercise. The estimated start date is October 2014. The NAICS Code for this procurement is 541330 (Engineering Services) and the annual small business size standard is $14 Million. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The contractor is not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Firms that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract or task order issued under the resulting contract are prohibited from providing the subsequent construction. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries/affiliates of the firm. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Brooks Act (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The evaluation and selection will be based on the following criteria: Criterion 1, Professional Qualifications; Criterion 2, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence; Criterion 3, Capacity; Criterion 4, Past Performance; Criterion 5, Location and Knowledge of the Locality; Criterion 6, Quality Control; and Criterion 7, Volume of Work. SF330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criterion responses. Criteria 1 and 2 are considered most important and equal among themselves; Criteria 3, 4, 5, and 6 are slightly less important and listed in descending order of importance; and Criteria 7 is of lesser importance and will be used as tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Evaluating past performance and experience may include information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and publicly available sources. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. In evaluating an Offeror’s capability, the Government shall consider how well the Offeror complied with these instructions. All projects provided in the SF330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member actually performing the work under this contract. Projects not performed by the office/branch/individual team member will be excluded from evaluation consideration. Submission Requirements: The SF330 Part 1 is limited to 30, 8.5”x11” single-sided pages. Minimum font size is 10. Submit the following: a) One (1) original and two (2) copies of the SF330 for the prime Offeror (which also includes a completed Part II for the firm and key subcontractors) addressing the following selection criterion information; and b) one compact disk copy, in Adobe Acrobat format, of the complete SF330 being submitted by the firm. The organization chart, A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluations shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. SF330, Part 1, Section B: Contract Information: In Block 5, list firm’s Dun and Bradstreet Number in addition to the name of the firm. SF330, Part 1, Section D: Organization Chart: In addition to the Instructions provided for the SF330, (i.e. the names and roles of all key personnel in this contract/solicitation and the firm they are associated with), identify the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team, including key subcontractors. (Note: All individuals listed on the organization chart are not required to have a resume in Section E, such as administrative or lower level engineering positions, or individuals not providing primary structural engineering services.) This chart shall not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation. This chart must be affixed to the submittal to avoid separation in handling. SF330, Part 1, Section E, Resumes of Key Personnel, CRITERION 1, PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Professional qualifications of the proposed team members assigned to this contract in preparation of the required primary and secondary structural engineering services shall be evaluated. The evaluation will place more emphasis on qualifications in primary structural engineering services. The evaluation will take into account education, active professional registration(s), and the experience of the design team members. All key personnel must be professionally registered/accredited in their discipline. Key personnel shall include a minimum of three (3) registered professional Civil and/or Structural Engineers on staff of the prime A-E firm to perform the work anticipated under this contract. The Project Lead and Design Quality Control manager shall be registered Civil or Structural Engineers and members of the prime A-E firm. The Lead Structural Engineer shall also be a member of the prime A-E firm, and shall be a registered Structural Engineer (SE) in the state of California or other state which requires 16 hours of structural engineering testing for registration as an SE. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Provide brief resumes of each proposed team member who will specifically perform the structural engineering services listed above for this contract. Resumes of personnel performing only secondary or support services (as listed above) or providing other than structural engineering services are not required and will not be reviewed. All key personnel must include the state, license number and the expiration date of their professional registration(s). Provide the level of education achieved and the number of years engaged in the discipline. Identify the Project Lead (project manager and main point of contact) and Lead Structural Engineer for the contract. Identify the key personnel responsible for the Design Quality Control (QC) program. Resumes for these key personnel shall demonstrate relevant qualifications/credentials and experience in their respective roles. Each resume shall include a maximum of five (5) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate the individual member’s qualifications in performing the listed primary and secondary structural engineering services. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. Submit a brief description of the project within block 19 of the SF330, Section E requirement. Submit projects in which the key personnel performed a significant role. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) The role and responsibilities of the individual in the project; and 2) The specific structural engineering services performed by the individual in the project. A “specific project” is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. “Recent” is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (February 2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects must be complete as of the SF330 due date. “Completion” is defined as the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, or the date that the final design or design-build package was completed. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. SF330, Part 1, Section F, Example Projects, CRITERION 2, SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team members in the preparation of the required primary and secondary structural engineering services shall be evaluated. The evaluation will place more emphasis on experience in primary services. Projects completed by the prime A-E firm identified in Part I may be given more consideration in the evaluation process than projects of proposed subcontractors. Projects completed in California may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: For the proposed team, submit a maximum of ten (10) specific, recently completed projects that best illustrate overall team experience in the required structural engineering services. Provide the month and year of completion of professional services for each project. If the project is a Department of Defense/Government contract, include the complete contract number, including the task order number if applicable. Projects involving only secondary or support services (as listed above) or providing other than structural engineering services are not required and will not be reviewed. Submit a brief description of the project within block 24 of SF330, Section F. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office performed the services. In addition, address key elements for each project by describing: 1) Specific Structural Engineering services performed by the firm; and 2) Sustainable features incorporated in the project (if none or if not applicable to the project, affirmatively state so). A “specific project” is a single project/function contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity or On-Call type Contract. “Recent” is defined as professional services completed within the past five years prior to the SF330 due date (February 2009 or later for purposes of this synopsis). Projects not yet completed will not be evaluated. “Completed” is defined as the date that the study/investigation was completed and submitted, or the date that the final design or design-build package was completed, and does not include construction contract support services or inspection during construction. Projects shall have been performed by the office(s) (main or branch) identified in Part 1, Section C. Projects not meeting these requirements will not be considered. If the proposed team is a joint venture (JV), information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the JV, information should be submitted for each JV partner, while ensuring you do not exceed the maximum of ten (10) projects for the proposed team. If a project was performed by a JV, and all JV members are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm should specifically address the work performed by the JV member submitting on this contract. Likewise, if the team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly identify the work actually performed by the team member and their roles and responsibilities on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities teaming on this contract, the project may not be considered for evaluation. SF330, Part 1, Section G, Key Personnel Participation in Example Projects: Submit in accordance with the SF330 Instructions. From the total projects listed in Section F, provide a maximum of ten (10) projects. SF330, Part 1, Section H, Additional Information requested by Agency. Address the remaining Criteria 3 through 7; additional sheets may be used up to the maximum of 30 total pages for Part 1. See submission requirements. Clearly identify the Criterion number and title. CRITERION 3, CAPACITY: Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm’s capacity to accomplish work in the required time frames. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) Present workload; and 2) Availability of the project team (including subcontractors) for the specified contract performance period; 3) Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously; and 4) Ability to sustain the loss of key personnel while accomplishing work within the required time limits, to ensure continuity of services and ability to meet surges in unexpected project demands. CRITERION 4, PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance with relevant contracts/projects with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, compliance with performance schedules with emphasis on example projects presented in Section F. Firms will be evaluated based on past performance assessments and other available information regarding past performance. Points of contact provided in other criteria may be contacted. A proposal with no record of relevant past performance information shall be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Show past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) or a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) evaluation for each project listed under Criterion 2. If a completed ACASS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If there is not a completed ACASS evaluation, the PPQ included with this notice is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN AN ACASS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE. If an ACASS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the A-E is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project before the response date set forth in this notice, the A-E should complete and submit with their response the first page of the PPQ (Attachment #1), including contract and client information for the respective projects. A-Es should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Code RAQ20.EP, Attn: Elliott Penetrante, via email at elliott.penetrante@navy.mil, prior to the response date. A-Es shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQ or ACASS evaluations previously submitted in response to other A-E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Submitted ACASS and PPQ evaluations will not be counted as part of the 30 page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document. For each project provided as experience in Section F, list applicable awards and commendations. CRITERION 5, LOCATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE LOCALITY: Firms location within and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographical areas in which projects could be located shall be evaluated. The work for this contract shall occur at various Navy and Marine Corps facilities and other military installations located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. The majority of work will be in Southern and Central California. Prime A-E firms with a local office in the Southern California area may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that demonstrates the firm’s knowledge of and experience in the general geographical area of this contract. Address key elements by identifying and discussing: 1) The location of the firm’s main offices, branch offices, and subconsultants’ offices; 2) The team’s knowledge of and availability to work in the geographical area; and 3) Ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support at installations within the NAVFAC Southwest Area of Operations. CRITERION 6, QUALITY CONTROL: Demonstration of the design Quality Control (QC) program used by the firm that ensures technical accuracy and cross coordination among disciplines shall be evaluated. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the government’s effort to perform quality assurance may be considered more favorably in the evaluation process. Submission Requirements: Submit a narrative that describes the design QC program used by the firm to ensure technical integrity of provided services. Address key elements by identifying and describing: 1) The design QC process the A-E uses to ensure consistent quality work across the entire team (including subcontractors); 2) The prime A-E’s specific design QC processes for checking documents for coordination errors, omissions, conflicts, and discrepancies in the design/report documents, and processes for tracking and incorporating review comments; and 3) The prime A-E’s procedures for ensuring appropriate supervision and review, by a professionally registered structural engineer, of engineering personnel and structural engineering work product. CRITERION 7, VOLUME OF WORK: Volume of DOD work awarded to the firm in past 12 months with objective of equitably distributing contracts among firms, including minority owned firms and firms without prior DOD contracts shall be evaluated. Submission Requirements: Provide a list of DOD contracts/task orders awarded in the last 12 months to the firm identified in the SF330 as the Prime. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. Do not include work performed as a subcontractor. Include the dollar amount for each DOD contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. Include agency phone numbers and points of contact. Joint ventures (JV) should list awards to the JV entity and separately list awards to each individual JV member for that time period. SELECTION INTERVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Personal interviews may be scheduled for firms slated as most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. Please note Joint Ventures (JV) slated for interviews will be required to provide a copy of the JV Agreement prior to the interview. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: All information must be included in the SF330 package, (cover letter, attachments and excess number of pages will be excluded from the evaluation process). System for Award Management (SAM) Database: Ensure your firm has an active SAM entity record. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). SAM is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awardee information. Please complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code and DUNS or DUNS+4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at: https://www.sam.gov In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E Firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm. Provide evidence that your firm, subcontractor or proposed team members are permitted by law to practice the profession of Architecture or Engineering, i.e. State registration number, a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc. Architect-Engineer firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF330 package per the submission requirements to the office shown below. One copy of the submittal package (original, plus 2 copies and 1 CD) is to be received in this office (NAVFAC Southwest, Attn: Elliott Penetrante, Code RAQ20.EP, 1220 Pacific Highway , San Diego, CA 92132) no later than, 2:00 P.M. Pacific Standard Time on WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 2014, in order to be considered. Facsimile and emailed SF330’s will not be accepted. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Read the following information carefully. It is an Offerors responsibility to deliver its SF330 to the proper place at the proper time which includes allowing a reasonable amount of time for the delivery of the SF330 (FAR 15.208(a)). Offerors shall ensure that SF330s are mailed or sent by courier in a timely manner to be delivered to the NAVFAC Southwest facility no later than the date and time stated in this notice. An Offeror risks the late receipt and rejection of their SF330 when it delays delivering its SF330 until the last few minutes before the time set for receipt of SF330s. Offerors intending to deliver the SF330 in person to the facility at the address above are cautioned that this NAVFAC Southwest facility is located in downtown San Diego. It is recommended that the Offeror allows for delays in driving through downtown San Diego caused by traffic (both freeway and downtown), train/trolley crossing, parking at the pay lots/meters near the facility, and gaining access to a secure Government facility. No parking or offloading of SF330s is available at the Government facility. SF330s are to be delivered to the mailroom in Building 128 and reasonable time shall be allowed for the person in the mailroom to receive and time stamp the SF330. The stamp time is determined from the NAVFAC Southwest facility mailroom time stamp and not any other time keeping equipment that the Offeror may own. Immediately upon SF330 delivery the Offeror shall leave the Government facility. An Offeror that does not leave the premises may be requested to leave or be escorted off the premises. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. NO SOLICITATION PACKAGE, TECHNICAL INFORMATION, OR BIDDER/PLAN HOLDER LIST WILL BE ISSUED. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the NAVFAC electronic solicitation website NECO (Navy Electronic Commerce Online) at: https://www.neco.navy.mil for any revisions to this announcement or other notices. Plan-holder list is available via the NECO website and an Interested Vendors List is available via the FedBizOpps website, www.fbo.gov, under this solicitation number. Address inquiries preferably via email: elliott.penetrante@navy.mil or via telephone: 619-532-2967. *** END OF ANNOUNCEMENT ***

H92244-16-T-0132

Other Defense Agencies, U.S. Special Operations Command | Published April 11, 2016  -  Deadline April 22, 2016
cpvs

Link To Document Total Small Business

Containers

Other Defense Agencies, U.S. Special Operations Command | Published May 12, 2016  -  Deadline May 25, 2016
cpvs

Link To Document Total Small Business

Advanced Methods of Entry COI

Other Defense Agencies, U.S. Special Operations Command | Published November 17, 2017  -  Deadline December 22, 2017
cpvs

Link To Document Total Small Business

70 -- Navy CANES 1RU, 2RU, and 3RU Servers

Department of the Navy, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command | Published September 1, 2015  -  Deadline September 16, 2015
cpvs

This requirement is in support of Navy's Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) program tactical afloat network that consolidates legacy networks into a single integrated network onboard surface ships and submarines. This is a SSC Pacific combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Part 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Competitive offers are being requested under (RFP) # N66001-15-T-0171. The NAICS code applicable to this acquisition is 334111 and the small business size standard is 1,000 employees. This is a Total Small Business Set-Aside. Only offers submitted by Small Business Concerns will be accepted by the Government. Any offer that is submitted by a offeror that is not a Small Business Concern will not be considered for award. See link below and attached "Combined Synopsis Solicitation" document for details.

IDIQ MACC SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, AND RENOVATION OF FIRE PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS IN CA, AZ, NV, UT, CO AND NM

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published June 11, 2015
cpvs

Link To Document
Categories
  United StatesSan-diego - Show all cities
San diego, ca (1061)San antonio, tx (191)Bob wilson drive san diego, ca (77)San diego, ca (55)San francisco, ca (25)Pacific highway san diego, ca (21)Floor san diego, ca (14)Clement street san francisco, ca (13)San diego , ca (12)San angelo, tx (10), null null (8)San pedro, ca (7)San pedro, ca (6)San francisco, ca (5)San luis obispo, ca (5)Aviano, 1 (3)Carolina, pr (3)Fl san francisco, ca (3)Multiple locations (3)San antonio, tx (3)San antonio , tx (3)San francisco va medical center (3)San luis obispo, ca 93405 (3)Worldwide (3)Aviano, 1 (2)Clement st san francisco, ca (2)Camp roberts, ca 93451 (2)Fort sam houston, tx (2)Goodfellow afb, tx (2)Multiple locations (2)San diego, ca 92132 (2)San juan county, nm (2)San juan, pr (2)San miguel, ca 93451 (2)Sneath lane san bruno, ca (2)Aviano , 1 (1)Agana heights, 2 (1)Aviano air base, italy (1)Ballast point, ca (1)Bedrock, co (1)Corona del mar, ca (1)Camp san luis obispo, ca (1)Clement st san francisco, ca (1)Floor east san francisco, ca (1)Floor san francisco, ca (1)Fort worth, tx (1)Golden gate avenue san francisco, ca (1)Goodfellow , tx (1)Goodfellow, tx (1)Mcrd san diego (1)Market street san francisco, ca (1)National park service (1)Naval medical center san diego (nmcsd) (1)Newcomb, nm 87455 (1)North access road san francisco ca 94128-3099 (1)Norwood, co (1)Pacific highway san diego, ca (1)Parks, ca (1)Paso hondo street san antonio, tx (1)Please see attached sf18 form (1)Puerto rico, pr (1)Reference statement of work (1)Region 9 (1)San diego , ca (1)San diego, ca 92123 (1)San francisco ca (1)San miguel , ca (1)San vito dei normanni, 1 (1)Sandiego, ca (1)San diego, ca (1)San bernardino, ca (1)San carlos, az (1)San diego, ca 92110 (1)San diego, ca 92123 (1)San diego, ca. 92123-5000 (1)San dirgo, ca (1)San francisco, ca 94130 (1)San francisco, ca 94111 (1)San francisco, ca 94123 (1)San francisco, california 94102 (1)San fransisco, ca (1)San joaquin, ca (1)San jose, ca (1)San juan, pr 00901 (1)San luis obispo county, california (1)San luis, az (1)San diego, ca (1)San pedro, ca (1)Sanfrancisco, ca (1)Sand diego, ca (1)Sandiego, ca (1)Seed location (san diego ca.) (1)Sofia (1)South san francisco, ca (1)Tenth ave. marine terminal (1)Va and/or san diego, ca (1)Various national shipping locations (1)Various locations in colombia, mainly bogota (1)San diego, ca (1)