Public tenders for architect, architecture in Norfolk United States

Find all Architecture tenders in the world.
Finding business opportunities has never been easier.

Results for architecture. Make a new search!

Multi-Discipline Architect-Engineering IDIQ

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published January 25, 2016
cpvs

This is NOT a solicitation. Do Not Submit proposals or questions in response to this document. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Norfolk District is issuing a pre-solicitation notice for Multi-Discipline Architect-Engineering Indefinite Delivery Contracts in support of the Norfolk District and Department of Defense, Norfolk District. The work will encompass architecture and engineering services for a broad variety of minor to major repair, modification, rehabilitation, alternatives and new construction projects primarily in support of the Department of Defense and associated Agencies. The type of work performed will be for secure and non-secure sites and will include: planning, programming, feasibility studies, geotechnical investigations, permitting, charrettes, master planning, Value Engineering, engineering studies, design services, estimating, surveying, site/field investigation, CADD drawing and document preparation and review, design review, operability and maintenance review of designs, construction management services, commissioning, studies, and reports. These services will include (but are not limited to) such areas as facility maintenance, repair, remodeling, renovation, or demolition; infrastructure; interior fit-up; new construction; physical security and counter terrorism (including weapons of mass destruction) force protection; fire protection; and communications for military and other non-military government agencies. This will be a firm fixed price contract. All work must be performed by or under the direct supervision of licensed professional Architects or Engineers. The work required extends beyond a single project effort, in that it involves the planning, design, scheduling, management, coordinating, investigating, and CADD support for a fluctuating flow of simultaneous, though unrelated, delivery orders. Therefore, the Contractor will be required to respond rapidly to Government requirements with outstanding professionalism and top quality craftsmanship, without compromising professional standards, current mission requirements, and end user readiness. It is imperative that the Contractor provides a flexible and multi-disciplined work force of the highest quality. A scope of work/statement of work will be issued with each individual task order. The Pre-Solicitation Notice proceeds a forthcoming unrestricted acquisition. The solicitation number will be W91236-16-R-0014. This is unrestricted acquisition. The applicable NAICS code is 541330 with a Small Business Size Standard of $15.0M. All responsible sources may submit a quotation that will be considered by Norfolk District. The government intends to award up to four (4) firm-fixed price contract. The four (4) contracts will possess one (1) base period and four (4) one-year option periods. The total amount for each contract is $10.0M. This is NOT a solicitation. Do Not Submit proposals or questions in response to this document. The solicitation will be issued electronically and will be available on Federal Business Opportunities (FBO), http://www.fbo.gov, on or about 21 February 2016. No telephone calls or written request for the solicitation package will be accepted. All prospective offerors are responsible for visiting the web page frequently to obtain the solicitation and nay amendments or other information pertaining to this solicitation. Prospective offerors must be registered on the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to be eligible for award. Representations and Certifications must also be updated via SAM. See https://www.sam.gov and https://www.acquisition.gov for registration information.  

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER (A/E) SERVICES FOR DESIGN PROJECTS (INDUSTRIAL TYPE BUILDINGS) LOCATED THROUGHOUT NAVFAC AOR, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 25, 2015  -  Deadline March 30, 2015
cpvs

This UNRESTRICTED procurement is for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architect–Engineering (A and E) Services for design projects (primarily Industrial Type Buildings) located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Area of Responsibility, Worldwide. Projects will be in the primary area of the NAVFAC EURAFSWA AOR in Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia; however, contract task orders may be placed for work for any DoD Activity worldwide. See attached synopsis notice for further details.

C--IDIQ contract for multi-discipline architect and engineering services in support of projects at military installations throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic North AOR

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 10, 2016
cpvs

North region A and E services, IDIQ contract for multi-discipline architect and engineering services in support of projects at military installations throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic North AOR.

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER (A/E) SERVICES FOR DESIGN PROJECTS (ADMINISTRATIVE TYPE BUILDINGS) LOCATED THROUGHOUT NAVFAC AOR, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published October 27, 2014  -  Deadline November 26, 2014
cpvs

This UNRESTRICTED procurement is for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for Architect–Engineering (A and E) Services for design projects located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Area of Responsibility, Worldwide. Projects will be in the primary area of the NAVFAC EURAFSWA AOR in Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia; however, contract task orders may be placed for work for any DoD Activity worldwide. This solicitation will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods. The combined total amount that may be paid (including option years) will not exceed $15,000,000.00. The guaranteed minimum for the entire contract terms (including option years) is $5,000.00 and will be satisfied by the award of the initial Task Order. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to work load and/or satisfaction of the A and E performance under the subject contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year up to a maximum of $15,000,000.00 for the entire contract term. Estimated start date is October 2015. This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310 (Architectural Services) ($7,500,000.00). The firm selected will be the most highly qualified to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The type of design projects expected to be performed under the contract include, but are not limited to: Administration Buildings, Religious Facilities, Dining Facilities, Recreational Facilities, Security Buildings, Child Development Centers, Bachelor Quarters, and related facilities. Architect-Engineering and Engineering Services that may be required under this contract include DD Form 1391 documentation, Design-Build RFPs, plans, specifications, cost estimates, related studies, field investigations, surveying and mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, conceptual designs, soil borings, hazardous materials identification, energy computation, life safety code studies, interior space comprehensive planning/design, conceptual designs, value engineering, other associated engineering services, shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI), Commissioning, and construction inspection and engineering consultation services during construction. SEE ATTACHED SYNOPSIS DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS ON SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS.

Contractor Support for Bi-SC Programme Management Capability

Other Defense Agencies, NATO, HQ Supreme Allied Commander Transformation | Published January 14, 2016  -  Deadline February 16, 2016
cpvs

Contractor support is required for the following areas: A. Technical Services  Requirements Management  Technical and operational architecture management  Verification, validation and operational acceptance management  Transition management B. Management services  Change Management  Project Analysis  Quality management  Business change management and operational risk  Programme governance  Risk and issue management

C--Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contract for Architect-Engineer Services for Utilities Engineering and Management Support Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Worldwide

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 11, 2015
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--COMPREHENSIVE LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NAVY (CLEAN)IN NAVFAC ATLANTICS AOR, PRIMARILY IN THE MID-ATLANTIC NORTHEAST IPT, SOUTHEAST, AND BRAC EAST AORs

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published October 15, 2015  -  Deadline November 18, 2015
cpvs

This UNRESTRICTED procurement is for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract for Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services for Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental Action Navy (CLEAN) in NAVFAC Atlantics Area of Responsibility (AOR), primarily in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Northeast IPT AOR, NAVFAC Southeast AOR, and BRAC East AOR. See attached synopsis notice for further details.

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 25, 2016  -  Deadline June 6, 2016
cpvs

N62470-16-R-6000 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE. Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Attachments: (a) Past Performance Questionnaire (b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for medical design projects located throughout the Naval Facility Engineering Command Area of Responsibility, Worldwide, and will be procured in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute (formerly known as the Brooks Act), 40 USC Section 1101 et seq., as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $50,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to work load and/or satisfaction of the AE performance under the subject contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year up to a maximum of $50,000,000 for the entire contract term. Estimated start date is December 2016. This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541310, (Architectural Services). The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the evaluation criteria. A sources sought for N62470-16-R-6000 for Medical Designs, predominantly for Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM) projects, was published on 3 December 2015 seeking responses from small businesses. Four responses were received from small business firms. After a technical evaluation of their qualifications, none of firms were determined to have the necessary qualifications and capabilities to perform the requirements of the contract based on the criteria established in the notice. The types of design projects expected to be performed under this contract are for 500 series facilities as defined by UFC 2-000-05N (hospitals, dental clinics, medical clinics, veterinary clinics, laboratories, etc.) and will be predominantly for Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM) projects, but may include MILCON projects and medical studies. Projects will be designed in accordance with criteria prescribed in the latest version of UFC 4-510-01 (Military Medical Facilities) and under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). Architect-Engineering and Engineering Services that may be required under this contract include DD Form 1391 documentation, Design-Build RFPs, Design-Bid-Build plans (AutoCAD and BIM) and specifications (SPECSINTACT), cost estimates, related studies, field investigations, surveying and mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, soil borings, hazardous materials identification, energy computation, life safety code studies, interior space comprehensive planning/design, conceptual designs, medical studies (e.g., Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, Concept of Operations), value engineering, other associated engineering services, shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI), Commissioning, construction inspection and engineering consultation services during construction, and other related services. The services of a qualified medical planner and a medical equipment planner are required. SELECTION INTERVIEW: Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) the AE firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (i.e., state registration number or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration. FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE SHOULD INCLUDE WITH THEIR SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM FURTHER EVALUATION. The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include the ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets or divider sheets, provided that these do not include any information regarding the capability of the company, or any information submitted in response to a question or requirement from the synopsis. If a cover sheet or divider sheet includes any information determined by the Contracting Officer to be substantially answering a question or requirement in the synopsis or explaining company capability, it will be counted as a page toward the 75 page limit). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 pitch/point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Interested firms shall submit (5) hard copies of the SF-330 and (5) CDs/DVDs to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race, 6506 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk VA 23508. If there are any discrepancies between the hard copy and CD, the hard copy will govern. Responses are due no later than June 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM EDT. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The point of contact is Heather Race, Contract Specialist, at 757-322-8103. NOTE: If hand-carrying or express mailing proposal, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly. Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified. All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass and ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: RAPIDGATE badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA. Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Excel spreadsheet). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the security department via email: 1. Iris Gholston, 757-322-8116, iris.gholston@navy.mil Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the security department at least five working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check. Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA. Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA: Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to heather.race@navy.mil. SELECTION CRITERIA: Standard Form 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly-qualified firm based on criterion responses. Failure to provide requested data or to comply with the instructions in this notice could result in a firm being considered less qualified or eliminated from consideration. The Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute and FAR Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The AE must demonstrate the team’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria. Failure to provide complete submission information defined in the evaluation factors below may affect a firm’s qualification ratings. Evaluation criteria 1 through 3 are considered most important and are equal among themselves; criteria 4 through 6 are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; criterion 7 is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation criteria include: 1. Specialized Experience 2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence 3. Past Performance 4. Quality Control 5. Program Management, Capacity and Location 6. Commitment to Small Business 7. Volume of Work Criterion 1 —Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F): Firms will be evaluated on relevant specialized experience and technical competence in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in: 1. Experience with regard to medical treatment facilities design and construction. 2. Experience with multi-phased design and construction of renovations of existing facilities performed within an operational medical facility that had to comply with infection control, life safety and Interim Life Safety Measures in compliance with The Joint Commission (TJC), and had to address noise/vibration control issues 3. Experience with medical facilities studies 4. Experience applying sustainability concepts to design and construction through an integrated, cost effective design approach in accordance with federally recognized sustainability ratings systems such as the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or Green Globes. Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following: 1. Experience with medical facilities in multiple NAVFAC geographic regions. Submission requirements: Provide two (2) relevant medical studies (e.g., Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, Concept of Operations) completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. Additionally, provide a maximum five (5) relevant design projects in which the design was completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Within the maximum five (5) submitted relevant design projects, provide a minimum of: • Two (2) projects that are phased medical renovation designs with construction cost between $1M to $50M.; and • Two (2) medical design projects with construction cost over $30M. If the project submitted is a Design-Bid-Build (full design), to be relevant, the design must be complete. If the project is Design-Build (DB), to be relevant, the DB design documents must be complete. If the project is a DB RFP development, to be relevant, the DB RFP must be complete. Sufficient information for each submitted project must include: • Date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. • Project building(s) size (SF or SM.) • Identify implementation of sustainable concepts employed, or sustainable certification achieved, such as (but not limited) to Green Globes or LEED. For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count). If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements. All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the value of the work that firm provided towards the performance of the overall project. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the firm/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the firm/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the firm/team member proposed for this contract and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of five (5) total design projects in the submission package. At least one (1) relevant project must be submitted from each joint venture partner if no projects were performed by the joint venture. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion. Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers may result in a firm being considered less qualified. All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1. Criterion 2—Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF330, Part I, Sections E and G): Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Failure to provide a balanced workforce in the disciplines required to satisfy the requirements of the scope listed above will result in the firm being considered not qualified. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are Program Manager, Medical Planner, Medical Equipment Planner, Quality Control, Project Manager, Architect, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, Geotechnical Engineer; a licensed Fire Protection Engineer is required; a practicing certified interior designer; cost estimator and scheduler are also required. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each and should indicate: professional registration (including registration / certification number), certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent experience within the past seven (7) years on project-specific work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Differentiate between planning and design experience. Include any sustainable professional accreditation, such as (but not limited to) LEED AP, Green Globes Professional. Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS/ACASS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight. Submission Requirements: SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project the firm includes under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. A FIRM SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS IS AVAILABLE. IF A CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race via email at heather.race@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total. Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation. Criterion 4—Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors. Submission Requirements: Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall: 1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously. Additionally, discuss any lessons learned that have led to the proposed plan. 2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components. 3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, specifically, technical accuracy of and assurance of overall coordination of plans and specifications, and engineering and design services. 4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles, responsibilities and authorities assigned to the individual(s). 5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors. Criterion 5—Program Management and Capacity and Location (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and on the locations of their office(s) that will be performing the work under this contract. Submission Requirements: 1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable. Teams with a demonstrated history of working together may be considered more favorably 2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably. 3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members and how these locations will be advantageous to the government. Due to the worldwide coverage of this contract, office in multiple locations may be considered advantageous. Criterion 6—Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated in terms of their extent to identify and commit to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Businesses shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, large businesses shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals for FY2015 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals: FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 SB 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% HubZone 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% SDB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% WOSB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% SDVOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% VOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses; however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract. The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310, Architectural and Engineering Services, size standard $7,500,000. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template. Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H) Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified AE firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD AE contracts. Submission Requirements: Firms do not submit data for this factor. The government will obtain information as described above. For joint venture (JV) submissions, the government will obtain the data for each JV partner.

U--100-percent Web-Based eLearning solution to provide training in the use of Autodesk Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Design Applications Training

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published September 3, 2015  -  Deadline September 17, 2015
cpvs

Please see attached documents for more information regarding this combined synopsis/solicitation. Attachments include: - Combined synopsis/solicitation - Statement of work - Attachment I PPQ

C--IDIQ CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR COST ENGINEERING AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND ATLANTIC AOR, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published June 21, 2016  -  Deadline July 21, 2016
cpvs

See Attached

C--IDIQ FOR MULTI DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SUPPORT OF PROJECTS IN THE NAVFAC ATLANTIC AOR PRIMARILY JEB LC-FS, NSN NORFOLK AND NAS OCEANA

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published June 24, 2015
cpvs

Projects may involve single or multiple disciplines. Projects may include multiple disciplines or single disciplines, including but not limited to architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, fire protection, and interior design. Projects may include the following engineering and design services, but are not limited to, (a) Building construction and addition of Special Projects and MILCON facilities; (b) General building renovation work; (c) Development of Design-Bid-Build packages; (d) Development of Design-Build Request for Proposal (RFP) packages; (e) Conducting Life Safety Code Studies; (f) Interior space planning/design studies; (g) Engineering and design site work, paving, landscaping, communications, fire protection, energy conservation systems, and utilities; (h) Facility planning, which includes project programming documents (1391 development) which entails preparation of basic project documents of Form DD 1391 in Navy’s Electronic Procurement Generator (EPG); (i) Development of requirements and project scope; (j) Preparation of engineering evaluations; (k) Preparation of unit guidance costs or parametric cost estimating; (l) Development of alternatives and economic analysis; (m) Analysis of proposed sites for foundations, utilities, access, constraints and identification of environmental, sustainable design and anti-terrorism/force protection issues; (n) Government collateral equipment lists; (o) USGBC LEED Checklists and Sustainable Design Reports; (p) Developing building commissioning requirements; (q) Project preliminary hazard analysis, obtaining permits and regulatory approvals; (r) Review of contractor submittals, field consultation and inspection during construction; (s) Title II Inspection; (t) Electronic Operation and Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI); and (u) Record document preparation.

Y--INDEFINITE QUANTITY INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT FOR MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PROJECTS IN THE NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC, HAMPTON ROADS IPT AOR AND NAVFAC ATLANTIC AOR

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published September 30, 2015
cpvs

N40085-15-D-0092 Doyon Project Services, LLC 33810 Weyerhaeuser Way S., Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 N40085-15-D-0093 EMR, Inc. 2110 Delaware Street, Suite B Lawrence, Kansas 66046 N40085-15-D-0094 GP Absher Once, LLC 2700 Holloway Road, Suite 107 Louisville, Kentucky 40299 N40085-15-D-0095 Ocean Construction Services 104 Aragona Blvd. Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 N40085-15-D-0096 Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc. 1491 Furnace Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104 N40085-15-D-0097 Syncon, LLC 201 Research Drive, Suite 101 Chesapeake, Virginia 23320 The seed project, P-992 Fast Company Training Facility, Yorktown, VA, Task Order 0001 was awarded to Ocean Construction Services in the amount of $$4,679,249 for line items 0001, 0002, and 0003.

PROFESSIONAL NAVAL ARCHITECTURAL AND MARINE ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF VARIOUS NOAA VESSELS

Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) | Published November 19, 2015  -  Deadline January 6, 2016
cpvs

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Eastern Acquisition Division, Norfolk, VA, on behalf of the Office of Marine and Aviation Operations (OMAO), is seeking small business firms that are highly qualified to provide services of Architect-Engineer (A-E) Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering in support of the various vessels assigned to OMAO. The Government anticipates awarding multiple Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts. Each contract will have a sixty (60) month ordering period. The maximum total dollar amount to be awarded and shared among all contracts shall not exceed $8.1 million. Should it be in the Government's interest to award a single IDIQ contract in lieu of multiple contracts, the single contract will have a sixty (60) month ordering period with a maximum value of $8.1 million. The contracts shall have a minimum contract guarantee amount of $5,000.00. Each task order will have a scope of work that will describe the specific project requirements and the length of its performance period. The performance period of individual task orders may vary based on the level of effort required by the scope of work. Task orders may be issued on a firm fixed-price, time and materials or labor hour basis. The primary work site will be at the contractor's facility; however, performance may be required at the Marine Operations Center offices and aboard NOAA ships and boats in U.S. ports, at sea, and at sites throughout the world. Task orders will be awarded in accordance FAR 36.6 Architect-Engineer Services and the terms of the contract. This acquisition is 100% set-aside for small business concerns. The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330, Engineering Services, specifically Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture, with an applicable size standard of $38.5 million. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.219-14 entitled "LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING" is applicable to this acquisition, requiring that at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended by employees of the concern. NOAA currently operates and maintains ships as identified on the NOAA Marine Operations website http://www.moc.noaa.gov/, including oceanographic, fisheries, and living marine resource research ships, as well as hydrographic survey ships between 726 and 3,250 long tons of displacement. The smallest of these is a steel small waterplane area twin hull (SWATH); all others are steel monohulls. NOAA also operates and maintains boats in support of oceanographic, hydrographic, or fisheries research projects. These include rigid hull inflatable boats (RHIBs) or aluminum hull boats that may be carried on board NOAA ships or involved in near coastal research work. These boats vary in size up to 50 feet (15 meters) in length. A boat's type, make, and configuration will vary in size depending upon its intended purpose. SCOPE: Tasks may involve single or multiple disciplines, and will include a variety of assignments including, but not limited to: 1. Development of engineering specifications and drawings for alterations, designs, construction, repairs, maintenance, requirements, feasibility, conceptual, and preliminary design studies of ships, boats and related support systems. 2. Conducting design studies to develop procurement specifications, associated drawings, cost estimate(s), and government-furnished Equipment (GFE) procurement specifications for construction, repair, and alteration of ships, small boats, and related support systems. 3. Conducting detail design studies on ship systems to develop engineering specifications and drawings, cost estimate(s), schedules, and labor estimates for construction, repair, and alterations of ships, small craft and related support systems. 4. Conducting stability tests, prototype installations, predictive and preventative maintenance analyses, engineering inspections and tests, weight and moment analyses, trim and stability analyses, preparation of weight reports and trim and stability booklets, and other ship system analyses for OMAO vessels. 5. Conduct fleet support studies, economic analyses, and operation research analyses for fleet maintenance, operation, modernization, alteration and logistic support. 6. Provide deliverable materials for computer-aided design (CAD), drafting and engineering products, drawings, calculations, reports, and graphics. 7. Coordinate with required subcontractor American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) as necessary to maintain ships in classification and compliance with statutory requirements. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Submit your qualifications on GSA Standard Form (SF) 330 ("ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS", OMB No. 9000-0157) and follow its instructions except as modified below. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT THE SF330 IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection shall be in accordance with FAR Part 36.6. Criterion 1 and 2 are of equal importance to each other and combined are more important than criterion 3, 4 and 5, which are listed in descending order of importance. Each potential contractor will be evaluated in terms of its: 1. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence (SF330, Section F) 2. Professional Qualifications (SF330, Section E) 3. Past Performance (SF330, Section H) 4. Capacity (SF330, Section H) 5. Quality Control Program (SF330, Section H) SF330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm(s) based on the responses to the selection criteria described herein. CRITERION 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Demonstrate specialized experience and technical competence in the technical specialties below. This list is provided for reference and does not exclude other areas of experience or competence, which may be presented as pertinent to this requirement. 1) Hull Systems a) Hydro mechanics b) Machinery foundations c) Structural design d) General arrangements e) Structural maintenance and repair f) Cathodic protection 2) Ship Control Systems a) Helm b) Engine c) Rudder d) Navigation e) Communications f) Research ship mission operations 3) Mission Support Systems a) Living marine resource handling and laboratory systems b) Computer systems c) Communication systems d) Hydrographic sensor and plotting systems e) Oceanographic sensor and laboratory systems f) Scientific mission computer systems g) Scientific mission communication systems 4) Deck Machinery Systems a) Weight handling systems (scientific mission support) i) A-Frames ii) J-Frames iii) Cranes iv) Platforms b) Winches c) Deck Machinery d) Ship's launches 5) Propulsion and Control Systems a) Main propulsion b) Propellers c) Diesel engines d) Machinery controls e) Automated plant controls f) Gears g) Shafting h) Diesel electric engines 6) Auxiliary Systems a) Pump and associated piping service systems b) Compressor and associated piping service systems c) HVAC systems d) Hydraulic systems e) Potable water systems f) Waste systems (solid, oil, and water) g) Steering systems h) Rudder systems 7) Electrical Systems a) Power generation b) Power distribution c) Interior communications d) Lighting systems e) Conditioning 8) Berthing, Messing, and Habitability Systems a) Crew support services b) Passenger support services 9) Ship Support Systems a) Ship logistic support management b) Commercial regulatory standards c) Computer aided logistic support d) Hazardous materials management e) Economic analysis f) Computer and CAD applications g) Machinery condition analysis h) Vibration analysis i) Infrared analysis CRITERION 2 - PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Provide professional qualifications and capabilities of the staff to be assigned to this contract (grouped by firm, with personnel of the prime contractor first). Identify which of the prime contractor employees are key personnel who will have major contract responsibilities and/or provide unusual or unique expertise. An individual identified as key personnel shall be an employee of the prime contractor. Qualifications of staff will be considered if the individuals are permanent employees of the prime contractor or if the prime contractor clearly demonstrates that it has teaming and subcontracting arrangements in place which gives the prime contractor management authority over these individuals. Minimum qualifications of key personnel and other staff are provided in Attachment 1. Include recent experience in performing tasks relevant to the list in Criterion 1. The Program Manager or Senior Technical Manager shall be a registered professional engineer. Submit resumes for key personnel in Section E of the SF330. Resumes should cite project specific experience and the individual's proposed role in the proposed contract. Include each proposed key person who will participate significantly in the work required for this contract. Each resume shall include projects that best illustrate the individual's qualifications and experience relevant to the requirements of this contract. Provide resumes only for those key personnel who will actually perform work under the proposed contract. Key personnel identified under this criterion should also be shown with their roles on the Organizational Chart provided under Section D of the SF330. Identify the state and discipline of actively licensed professional engineers. Identify personnel with specialty certifications and the credentialing bodies that granted them. CRITERION 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will evaluate past performance using the projects listed by the firm in Section F of the SF330. The evaluation will consider the team's past performance on relevant contracts with government and/or commercial projects in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Points of contact provided in the SF330 may be contacted. The prime contractor and its proposed team/subcontractors will be evaluated based on past performance assessments and other available information regarding past performance. Where there is no record of past performance, the firm will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. In Section H of the SF330, submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) evaluation for each project listed under Criterion 1. If a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If an ACASS/CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client's project point of contact. Submitted ACASS/CPARS evaluations will not be counted as part of the page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document. For projects provided in support of past performance in Section F of SF330, list and provide copies of any applicable performance awards received (not counted in the 40 page limitation for SF330, Part I). Clearly indicate to which Section F project the award relates; otherwise the information may not be considered. CRITERION 4 - CAPACITY: The evaluation will consider the firm's capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Firms will be evaluated based on projected workload and staffing, and ability to meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING. Firms must demonstrate capacity to work on multiple projects in dispersed locations. On form SF330, Section H, indicate the firm's present and projected workload (including project type, dollar amount, and complexity), staffing plan, (including location of staff), and the availability of the proposed team for this contract performance period. Provide any additional information pertinent to the firm's capacity to meet the FAR 52.219-4 requirement that at least 50% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the prime contractor. Demonstrate capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously with overlapping delivery dates. CRITERION 5 - QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM: The evaluation will consider the firm's corporate quality control program, processes and procedures, and assigned authorities for the Quality Control (QC) program to ensure technical accuracy of the A-E work product and effective cross-coordination among firms. For firms teaming with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the Government's quality assurance (QA) effort in reviewing the A-E's work product may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submittal of broad or generic quality control manual is not acceptable. Provide a description of the steps the project team will use for each of the tasks under the proposed contract that relate to: (1) Management of workload, coordination between team members, and assignment of tasks to appropriate personnel across all disciplines; (2) Use of appropriate technical methodology, technical and regulatory accuracy, consistency between resource topics in a single document; (3) Illustrate successes in ensuring quality and identify any commendations or evaluations regarding QC; (4) In addition to technical document preparation, discuss how the project team proposes to provide quality service in terms of understanding government client objectives, following government-provided document forms and templates, providing timely responses to Government requests, and reducing government time and effort required to manage the contract; (5) Of special interest are the quality control processes for checking documents in place that minimize the Government's need to perform quality assurance reviews of the A-E's work product for errors, omissions, and quality across all disciplines. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Qualified firms are invited to submit a completed SF330. Documents shall be annotated with identification number NMAN7200-14-00205. The SF330, Part I, is limited to forty (40) single-sided 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch pages. A page refers to one printed side of a piece of paper (e.g., 20 pieces of paper printed on both sides equates to 40 total pages). The only exception is the Organization Chart that may be an 11 inch X 17 inch page, with half inch margins and one-sided. The SF330 shall include a completed Part II for each team member and branch office identified in Part I. There is no page limit for Part II. Submit one (1) original and four (4) hard copy packages of the SF330 in 3 ring binders (comb bound proposals will not be accepted). Minimum font size is 10 point for Parts I and II, excluding any pre-formatted font in SF330 forms. Margins will be ½ inch on non-SF330 pages. Firms shall fully complete Part I, Sections A through C of the SF330. In Section B, block 5, firms shall provide their DUNS number in addition to the name of the firm. Under Part 1, Section D, in addition to the instructions provided for the SF330, provide an organizational chart that identifies the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team. Non-key personnel may also be shown on the organizational chart. The organizational chart will not be counted as part of the page limit for Part I, but it must be affixed to the submittal to prevent separation in handling. Firms that elect to propose as a joint venture (JV) or Limited Liability Company (LLC) (as a separate legal entity) shall submit their legally binding formal JV or LLC agreement(s) along with their Standard Form (SF) 330. All such agreements shall be signed by the parties and shall demonstrate the relations between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind them. The JV or LLC shall also be registered in the System for Award Management at https://www.sam.gov at the time of SF330 submission. The legal documentation verifying the JV or LLC will not be considered part of the page limit for SF330 submission. Joint Venture agreements shall be submitted in Section H, Additional Information of the SF330. Section I shall be signed and dated by the Offeror's Authorized Representative. Additional Information: THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - DO NOT SUBMIT PRICE PROPOSALS AT THE TIME OF SF330 SUBMISSION. All information must be included in the SF330 package. Cover letters, excess number of pages and attachments other than those prescribed herein will be excluded from the evaluation process. In accordance with Selection of Architects and Engineers, 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11 (previously known as the Brooks Act), the firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm and shall submit proof of this with the submission of the SF330. Specifically, section 901(1) of Selection of Architects and Engineers, 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11 requires that a firm be a legal entity permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture and engineering. In states where firms are required to be registered under state law, firms shall submit that information. Should the A-E be permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture and engineering in more states within the geographic region covered by the proposed contract, firms shall submit that information. In states where a firm is not required to be registered under state law, the name of the registered architect or engineer with their state registration number and business license is acceptable. Firms must submit proof with the SF330 that they have filed the Organizational Record Form for their principal office(s). All firms are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render a firm ineligible for award. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free website that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). It is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awarded information. Firms shall ensure you complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code, DUNS or DUNS + 4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at https://www.sam.gov. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Firms having capabilities to perform this work and desiring to be considered shall submit five hard copy packages, each consisting of one completed SF-330 (latest edition) submission for the project as follows: One (1) original hard copy of the SF330 Response to: DOC/NOAA Eastern Acquisition Division (EAD) Attn: Melissa R. Sampson 200 Granby Street, Suite 815 Norfolk, VA 23510 One (1) hard copy of the SF330 Response to: Department of Commerce Office of General Counsel Contract Law Division Attn: Florence Bridges 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 Three (3) hard copies of the SF 330 Response to: NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations Marine Operations Center Attn: Geoff Wilkie, Naval Architect 2002 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365-5275 SF330 Responses are due no later than 3:00 p.m., local time, January 6, 2016; however, interested/qualified firms need not wait until then to submit. Submittals received after this date and time will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208. Electronic submission is not approved and responses submitted by electronic means shall not be accepted. The original SF330 response due to EAD Norfolk constitutes the official-time stamp submission. It is the firm's responsibility to check the FEDBIZOPPS website at www.fedbizopps.gov for revisions to this announcement or other notices. Inquiries regarding this notice shall be submitted in writing no later than seven (7) business days prior to the response date to Michelle Blake, Contract Specialist, at michelle.blake@noaa.gov and simultaneously to Melissa R. Sampson, Contracting Officer, at melissa.r.sampson@noaa.gov.

IT Governance and Process Support.This requirement encompasses all activities to provide support to the Military Sealift Command (MSC) Command, Control, Communications and Computer Systems (C4S) Directorate (N6) Mission Support Division (N63).

Department of the Navy, Military Sealift Command | Published August 17, 2015
cpvs

  IT Governance and Process Support This requirement encompasses all activities to provide support to the Military Sealift Command (MSC) Command, Control, Communications and Computer Systems (C4S) Directorate (N6) Mission Support Division (N63).  The Mission Support Division oversees five functional areas that govern the MSC Information Technology and Communications Programs' investment planning, decisions, and execution.    The five areas are:  Knowledge Management, Financial Management, Portfolio Management, Enterprise Architecture, and Funds Execution.  MSC's mission is to support our nation by delivering supplies and conducting specialized missions across the world's oceans.  The C4S Directorate is responsible for lifecycle management of C4S for the MSC fleet, providing the acquisition and deployment of new C4S assets and the disposal of assets at end of life as well as the management and coordination of electronics technical support and fleet C4S installations and upgrades. MSC maintains a single portfolio of all IT investments, with segmented views by:  2 funding streams, 21 budget activities, and 48 systems.   

Ossuary - Tomb of Remebrance

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published November 4, 2015
cpvs

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Norfolk District is issuing a pre-solicitation notice for Tomb of Remembrance Ossuary at Arlington National Cemetery (ANC), Arlington, VA. The work consists of providing all materials, labor, equipment and personnel to construct an in-ground receptacle for cremated remains. The Ossuary will consist of an above ground shaft within a conical structure with a lockable access panel that allows cremated remains to be deposited into a 2,500 to 3,000 gallon vault concealed below ground. The conical structure will likely be constructed of monumental quality stonework designed to complement surrounding landscape and architecture. The conical structure will place to one side of an 11-12 foot diameter circle of decorative granite stones with a semi-arc footwall that contains an engraved inscription. This circular area will be located along a walkway with granite pavers and a stone bench is to be located across the pathway from the circular monument area, bordering the walkway. The solicitation number will be W91236-16-R-0009. This will be an unrestricted acquisition. The applicable NAICS code is 237990 with a Small Business Size Standard of $36.5M. All responsible sources may submit a proposal which will be considered by Norfolk District. The magnitude of this project is between $250,000.00 and $500,000.00. The government intends to award a firm-fixed price contract utilizing best value tradeoff. The anticipated period of performance is 190 days. This is NOT a solicitation. Do Not Submit proposals or questions in response to this document. The solicitation will be issued electronically and will be available on Federal Business Opportunities (FBO), http://www.fbo.gov, on or about 20 Nov 2015. No telephone calls or written request for the solicitation package will be accepted. All prospective offerors are responsible for visiting the web page frequently to obtain the solicitation and any amendments or other information pertaining to this solicitation. Prospective offerors must be registered on the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to be eligible for award. Representations and Certifications must also be updated via SAM. See https://www.sam.gov and https://www.acquisition.gov for registration information.

Arlington National Cemetery - Ossuary Tomb of Remembrance

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published June 24, 2015
cpvs

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Norfolk District is issuing a pre-solicitation notice for Tomb of Remembrance Ossuary at Arlington National Cemetery (ANC), Arlington, VA. The work consists of providing all materials, labor, equipment and personnel to construct an in-ground receptacle for cremated remains. The Ossuary will consist of an above ground shaft within a conical structure with a lockable access panel that allows cremated remains to be deposited into a 2,500 to 3,000 gallon vault concealed below ground. The conical structure will likely be constructed of monumental quality stone work or prefabricated concrete sections that closely resemble quality stone construction that has been designed to compliment surrounding landscape and architecture. The conical structure will place to one side of an 11-12 foot diameter circle of decorative granite stones with a semi-arc footwall that contains an engraved inscription. This circular area will be located along a walkway with granite pavers and a stone bench is to be located across the pathway from the circular monument area, bordering the walkway. The solicitation number will be W91236-15-R-0037. This is set-aside for small business contractors. The applicable NAICS code is 237990 with a Small Business Size Standard of $36.5M. All responsible sources may submit a proposal which will be considered by Norfolk District. The magnitude of this project is between $250,000.00 and $500,000.00. The government intends to award a firm-fixed price contract utilizing best value tradeoff. The anticipated period of performance is 180 days. This is NOT a solicitation. Do Not Submit proposals or questions in response to this document. The solicitation will be issued electronically and will be available on Federal Business Opportunities (FBO), http://www.fbo.gov, on or about 10 July 2015. No telephone calls or written request for the solicitation package will be accepted. All prospective offerors are responsible for visiting the web page frequently to obtain the solicitation and nay amendments or other information pertaining to this solicitation. Prospective offerors must be registered on the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to be eligible for award. Representations and Certifications must also be updated via SAM. See https://www.sam.gov and https://www.acquisition.gov for registration information.

Ship Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Parts Buy

Department of the Navy, Military Sealift Command | Published May 5, 2015  -  Deadline May 11, 2015
cpvs

1. Action Code: Draft Award 2. Date: May 5, 2015 3. Year: Fiscal Year: 2015 4. Contracting Office Zip Code: 23511 5. Classification Code: FSC: 2090/PSC: 2010; NAICS: 333611 6. Contracting Office Address: MSC Norfolk, 471 "C" Street, Bldg-SP 64, Norfolk, VA, 23511 7. Subject: Pre- solicitation Synopsis Purchase for Ship Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Parts 8. Proposed Solicitation Number: N32205-15-T-2246 / Award Number: N32205-15-P-4278 9. Closing Response Date: May 11, 2015, 5:00 pm, Eastern time, Norfolk, Virginia 10. Contact Point or Contracting Officer: Andrew Sargeant, 757-443-5889, andrew.sargeant@navy.mil 11. Contract Award and Solicitation Numbers: Award # N32205-15-P-4278 / Solicitation # N32205-15-T-2246 12. Contract Award Dollar Amount: TBD 13. Contract Line Item Number: CLIN 0001 - 0006 14. Contract Award Date: NLT May 31, 2015 15. Contractor: Fincantieri Marine Systems North America 16. Description: MSC Norfolk has a requirement to award a sole source contract to Fincantieri Marine Systems North America (FMSNA) , for the purchase of OEM parts Ship Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) in support of USNS SPEARHEAD (JHSV-1) a. National Stock Number (NSN) if assigned: N/A b. Manufacturer, including part number, drawing number, etc. i) Ship Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Parts ii) Part No. 00D44500C, 347432-C021P1, etc. c. Size, dimensions, or other form, fit or functional description: N/A d. Predominant material of manufacture: N/A e. Quantity, including any options for additional quantities: 72 f. Unit of issue: EA g. Destination information: FOB: Destination h. Delivery schedule: May 22, 2015 i. Duration of the contract period: TBD j. For Architect-Engineer projects: N/A k. Fincantieri Marine Systems North America (FMSNA) is the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and has proprietary and update rights to this equipment. No other vendors have rights to purchase and resell these spare parts to the Government. l. All responsible sources may submit a capability statement, proposal or quotation, which shall be considered by the agency. m. N/A n. Solicitation will not be made available on the FBO website, www.FBO.gov. Contact the Contract Specialist at andrew.sargeant@navy.mil or at (757) 443-5962. o. N/A p. No technical data is required, parts must be FMSNA models and match part numbers. 17. Place of Contract Performance: MSC W143, Norfolk, VA (Delivery). 18. Set-aside Status: Sole Source 19. Rationale for Small Business Strategy : N/A

Bridge Equipment SBS

Department of the Navy, Military Sealift Command | Published May 8, 2015  -  Deadline May 14, 2015
cpvs

1. Action Code: Draft Award 2. Date: May 8, 2015 3. Year: Fiscal Year: 2015 4. Contracting Office Zip Code: 23511 5. Classification Code: FSC: 2090/PSC: 2010; NAICS: 334511 6. Contracting Office Address: MSC Norfolk, 471 "C" Street, Bldg-SP 64, Norfolk, VA, 23511 7. Subject: Pre- solicitation Synopsis Purchase for Bridge Equipment SBS 8. Proposed Solicitation Number: N32205-15-T-2248 / Award Number: N32205-15-P-4280 9. Closing Response Date: May 14, 2015, 5:00 pm, Eastern time, Norfolk, Virginia 10. Contact Point or Contracting Officer: Andrew Sargeant, 757-443-5889, andrew.sargeant@navy.mil 11. Contract Award and Solicitation Numbers: Award # N32205-15-P-4280 / Solicitation # N32205-15-T-2248 12. Contract Award Dollar Amount: TBD 13. Contract Line Item Number: CLIN 0001 - 0083 14. Contract Award Date: NLT June 4, 2015 15. Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - Sperry Marine Inc. 16. Description: MSC Norfolk has a requirement to award a sole source contract to Sperry Marine Inc., for the purchase of OEM Bridge Equipment SBS in support of USNS TRENTON (JHSV-5) a. National Stock Number (NSN) if assigned: N/A b. Manufacturer, including part number, drawing number, etc. i) Sperry Marine Bridge Equipment SBS c. Size, dimensions, or other form, fit or functional description: N/A d. Predominant material of manufacture: N/A e. Quantity, including any options for additional quantities: 72 f. Unit of issue: EA g. Destination information: FOB: Destination h. Delivery schedule: July 31, 2015 i. Duration of the contract period: TBD j. For Architect-Engineer projects: N/A k. Sperry Marine Inc. is the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and has proprietary rights to this equipment to include all updates. No other vendors have rights to purchase and resell these parts to the Government. l. All responsible sources may submit a capability statement, proposal or quotation, which shall be considered by the agency. m. N/A n. Solicitation will not be made available on the FBO website, www.FBO.gov. Contact the Contract Specialist at andrew.sargeant@navy.mil or at (757) 443-5962. o. N/A p. No technical data is required; parts must be FMSNA models and match part numbers. 17. Place of Contract Performance: MSC W143, Norfolk, VA (Delivery). 18. Set-aside Status: Sole Source 19. Rationale for Small Business Strategy : N/A

C--COMPREHENSIVE LONG-TERM ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NAVY (CLEAN), PRIMARILY IN THE NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC HAMPTON ROADS AND MARINE CORPS IPTs, WASHINGTON, NORTHWEST, SOUTHWEST AND EURAFSWA AORs AND PUERTO RICO

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published January 8, 2015  -  Deadline February 9, 2015
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This procurement is for Architectural-Engineering (A-E) Services and will be procured in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute as implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 36.6. This procurement is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. The Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute requires agencies to conduct discussions with at least three qualified firms during the selection of firms for Architect-Engineering contracts. The Sources Sought Notice for this requirement, dated 27 February 2014, did not reveal at least three small businesses that possess the required capabilities and capacity to accomplish the work expected under this contract. FAR 36.101(b) states, “When a requirement in this part is inconsistent with a requirement in another part of this regulation, this Part 36 shall take precedence if the acquisition of construction or architect-engineer services is involved;” therefore, the “rule of two” normally used to determine whether a requirement can be set-aside for small business as described in FAR 19 does not apply to this procurement; therefore, Part 36 takes precedence over Part 19, including FAR 19.502-2. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office and Small Business Administration (SBA) Procurement Center Representative (PCR) concur with this decision. This procurement is a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Architect-Engineer (A-E) Contract for Environmental Engineering Support Services for Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental Action Navy (CLEAN) in Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Atlantic’s Area of Responsibility (AOR), primarily in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Hampton Roads and Marine Corps Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) AOR, NAVFAC Washington AOR, NAVFAC Northwest AOR, NAVFAC Southwest AOR, NAVFAC Europe Africa Southwest Asia (EURAFSWA) AOR, and Puerto Rico. The general scope of this requirement covers A-E services to provide program management and technical environmental services in support of the Department of the Navy’s (DON) Environmental Restoration Program (ERP), including the Installation Restoration Program (IRP), the Munitions Response Program (MRP), and other similar programs at any DON or Marine Corps site within NAVFAC Atlantic’s AOR. The principal geographical regions encompassed by this contract include the states of Alaska, California, Maryland, North Carolina, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Puerto Rico, the area of the District of Columbia, and, to a lesser extent, Wyoming, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Europe and other Department of Defense (DOD) installations nationwide and overseas. The contractor may also, on occasion, be tasked to provide services described herein to any NAVFAC Command, any DOD activity, or other Federal agency activities in any geographic location. Firms shall provide a full range of A-E environmental services for program management and technical services including the following: a. Those in support of the DOD’s ERP in compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976. Support of Navy and Marine Corps Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) efforts is also included. Services include, but are not limited to: performance of site management plans, community relation plans, preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial investigations, feasibility studies, RCRA facility investigations, corrective measures studies, interim measure plans, remedial and removal action designs, environmental assessments, risk assessments (both human health and ecological), contamination characterization, sampling, laboratory testing, presentations at restoration advisory boards (RABs), participation on partnering teams with regulators, operation and maintenance support, Geographical Information System (GIS) development and maintenance, and documentation preparation for facility support contracts and Title II management of remedial action implementation (including subcontract award and management); with emphasis on the accelerated schedules and increased sensitivity, visibility, and regulatory political and community concerns at Naval and Marine Corps installations. b. Those in support of the MRP. Services include the entire suite of Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) investigation stages consistent with CERCLA, progressing from a preliminary assessment/site investigation to a remedial investigation/feasibility study through the remedial design, all in accordance with explosive safety standards. Services also include methodologies for UXO detection, clearance, removal, and safety. c. Those in support of addressing large and/or complex Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants (POL) sites with multiple sources and distribution lines, including assessment characterization, testing monitoring, and remedial action design and oversight. d. Those in support of assessments, studies, investigations, and remedial designs that include other environmental programs such as air, water, waste water, solid waste, asbestos and hazardous substance/waste management, Range Sustainability Environmental Program Assessment (RSEPA), and complex compliance requirements requiring the integration of knowledge from several media and statutes in the United States and abroad. e. Those in support of expedited response actions. f. Those in support of the Navy Installation Restoration Information System (NIRIS) development and maintenance, Web page development and maintenance, GIS, and graphic support. The contract requires that the selected firms have on-line access to e-mail via the Internet for routine exchange of correspondence. Attention is directed to FAR subpart 9.5 and the following provisions. An organizational conflict of interest may exist, if a firm has performed as an Environmental Response Action prime contractor and performs as a CLEAN prime or subcontractor at the same site. An organizational conflict of interest may also exist on a project basis for firms who have performed as prime contractors on other Navy environmental engineering contracts. Firms are advised that NFAS 5252.209-9300 Alt I Organizational Conflicts of Interest will be included in the contract. The restrictions described herein shall apply to the contractor and its affiliates, joint venture partners, consultants and subcontracts under this contract. SELECTION CRITERIA Form 330 (SF-330)—The A-E must demonstrate its and each key consultant’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria for all services with particular emphasis on work in the geographical locations as described above. Criteria 1 through 3 are considered most important and are equal among themselves; criteria 4 through 7 are slightly less important and are equal among themselves; criterion 8 is of lesser importance and criterion 9 is the least important and will be used as a tiebreaker among technically equal firms. Criterion 1—Specialized Experience (SF 330, Sections F and H): Demonstrate specialized experience of the firm and/or proposed consultants that was substantially completed between September 2009 and August 2014. Demonstrate specialized experience in performing multiple, simultaneous projects involving field investigations and preparing studies/analysis/work plans/remediation oversight for environmental restoration projects and other technical support services. Demonstrate DOD, Federal Agency, and private experience relating to compliance with environmental laws and regulations for CERCLA (both NPL and non NPL), RCRA, Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), National Contingency Plan (NCP), MRP and interfacing with regulatory agencies (federal/state/local/international). Specialized experience should focus on the following geographic areas: Alaska, California, Maryland, North Carolina, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and, to a lesser extent, Wyoming, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Europe and other DOD installations nationwide and overseas. Recent experience with, and knowledge of, permits, construction material, and practices in the contracted areas should be demonstrated. Recent experience documenting innovative cleanup strategies and successful attainment of regulatory closure for CERCLA or RCRA sites should be included. A maximum of 10 projects in total will be evaluated. For submittal purposes, a project may be a single contract task order, a stand-alone contract, or an ID/IQ-type contract. ID/IQ contracts may be ongoing, with task orders within that contract that were substantially completed during the specified time frame. Note: If the firm is a JV, information should be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for each joint venture partner up to a total of 10 projects. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and all joint venture partners are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the firm/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the firm/team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project may be eliminated from consideration. Criterion 2—Professional Qualifications (SF330, Sections E, F and G): Professional qualifications and capabilities of the staff to be assigned to this contract must include: a. Experience from September 2009 to August 2014 in environmental technical disciplines, project management, performing field investigations, and preparing studies/analysis/work plans/remediation oversight for environmental restoration projects and other technical support services. Describe experience pertaining to CERCLA, RCRA, MRP, and radiological investigations. b. Interfacing with regulatory agencies (federal/state/local), with emphasis in Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and in other DOD installations nationwide and overseas. c. Expertise and experience in program management and demonstrated partnering/ teambuilding skills with regulatory and similar agencies. d. Depth of professional staff in delivery order level project manager and senior level managers. Demonstrate active professional engineering registration(s) as well as other relevant registration(s) and/or the ability to obtain registration(s) in Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Maryland, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Resumes for key personnel are limited to one page each and should cite project-specific experience and role in this contract. Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF 330, Sections F and H): The Government will evaluate past performance (both with Government agencies and private industry) in terms of cost control, overall quality of work, quality of technical data and conclusions, innovation and optimization, compliance with performance schedules, stakeholder and customer satisfaction, management and administration of DOD contracts, and reliability of the firm’s quality assurance and quality control program, with an emphasis on past performance on projects offered in Criterion 1. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided on Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) for Criterion 1 projects and may include other information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government (including contacts with points-of-contact provided in other criteria). Failure to provide requested data, accessible points-of-contact, or valid phone numbers could negatively impact a firm’s evaluation under this criterion. If the firm is a JV, information should be submitted as a JV. If there is no information for the JV, information should be submitted for each JV partner. Document recent awards and commendations (do not submit copies). Criterion 4—Safety (SF330, Section H): Submit the following information: (For a partnership or JV, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Experience Modification Rate (EMR) and Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.) (1) EMR: For the three previous complete calendar years (2011-2013), submit the EMR (comparing annual losses in insurance claims against policy premiums over a three year period). If there is no EMR, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation. (2) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) DART Rate: For the three previous complete calendar years (2011-2013), submit the OSHA DART Rate, as defined by OSHA. If there is no OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation. (3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the safety plan and how it will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices within the firm and at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. Criterion 5—Program Management (SF330, Section H): Describe/Demonstrate the following: a. Ability to concurrently perform and manage multiple complex projects (approximately 60–90 contract task orders) in different locations, to meet schedules, and to control direct and indirect costs. b. Ability to expeditiously submit technical and cost proposals, negotiate, and commence work immediately upon award of a CTO. c. Ability to coordinate and work effectively with other contractors involved in NAVFAC Atlantic environmental programs. d. Logical identification of explicit assignment of responsibilities among corporate team members. e. Proposed location of the program management office and other key staff members, how this organization will be advantageous to the Government, and a detailed description of the organizational structure and how it will function. Criterion 6—Quality Control (SF330, Section H): Describe the firm’s corporate quality control program and proposed approach for this contract. Further describe the firm’s process and procedures, authorities assigned to the firm’s quality control manager, and how the firm’s program extends to subcontractors (including laboratories and drillers). The quality control program shall demonstrate knowledge of applicable regulatory requirements related to quality control. Criterion 7—Capacity (SF330, Section H): Describe the firm’s capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Describe the firm’s ability to provide continuity of service with no or minimal program disruption and cost impact to projects initiated under existing NAVFAC Atlantic contracts. Indicate the firms present workload and the project team’s availability (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Indicate specialized equipment; particularly related to state of the art technology. Include the firm’s ability to obtain security clearance(s) for its key personnel. Criterion 8—Small Business Goals (SF330, Section H): Firms will be evaluated in terms of their extent to identify and commit to Small Business (SB), SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), SDVOSB, and, if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on two elements: (a) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (b) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of element (a), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI concerns. Large Business firms shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size that show how the various types of small business firms noted above were utilized. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the similar contracts, large business firms shall submit other documentation showing their utilization of the various types of small business firms for their contracts. Small Business firms shall also submit documentation showing their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of element (b), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Goals established by the Secretary of the Navy. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals: FY15 Goals: Small Business (SB) - 66.80%, HUBZone (HUB) - 8.94%, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) - 17.27%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) - 15.30%, Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3.03%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - 3.03%; FY16 Goals: Small Business (SB) - 66.94%, HUBZone (HUB) - 9.03%, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) - 17.44%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) - 15.45%, Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3.06%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - 3.06%; FY17 Goals: Small Business (SB) - 67.07%, HUBZone (HUB) - 9.12%, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) - 17.62%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) - 15.61%, Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3.09%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - 3.09%; FY18 Goals: Small Business (SB) - 67.20%, HUBZone (HUB) - 9.21%, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) - 17.79%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) - 15.77%, Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3.12%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - 3.12%; FY19 Goals: Small Business (SB) - 67.33%, HUBZone (HUB) - 9.30%, Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) - 17.97%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) - 15.93%, Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) - 3.15%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) - 3.15%. If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small business firms; however, small business firms shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template shall be used by large business firms to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their draft Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template. Criterion 9—Volume of Work (SF330, Section H): Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by the DOD within the past 12 months (January 2014-December 2014) with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DOD A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. State the dollar amount of work awarded to the firm by the DOD within the past 12 months; JVs should list the amount awarded to the JV entity as well as the amounts awarded to individual JV members for that time period. If the firm has had no DOD work within the previously 12 months, the firm should so state. The small business size standard classification is NAICS code 541330, Environmental Engineering Services ($15,000,000). The resulting contract will be a CPAF contract for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods. The ceiling for this procurement is established at $240,000,000. The guaranteed minimum is established at $200,000 for the base period. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to work load and/or satisfaction of the A-E performance under the subject contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. The firm selected will be the most highly qualified in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The contract will be CPAF with ID/IQ provisions. Individual contract task orders will be issued with statements of work which describe the nature of work to be performed and requirements for the period of performance. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM website: https://www.sam.gov. The following certifications and registrations are also mandatory prior to award of a contract: Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) @ https://orca.bpn.gov/ and Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) @ https://wawf.eb.mil/. Projects submitted in the SF-330 shall be projects completed by the proposed team members. Projects not performed by the proposed team members will be excluded from evaluation consideration. It is anticipated that interviews for slated firms will be conducted in Norfolk, VA. FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE SHOULD INCLUDE WITH THEIR SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM FURTHER EVALUATION. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed SF-330. The SF-330 should be typed, one sided, at least 12-pitch font or larger, and Part I shall not exceed 70 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (two 11 by 17 inch foldout sheets may be substituted for 8.5 by 11 sheets). Introductions shall not be included in Sections E and F. Please include your and all team members’ DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award; therefore, provide proof that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (i.e. state registration number, a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration. Six hard copies of the SF-330 and six CDs shall be submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic, Code ACQ21, Attn: Jen McDonald, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, Norfolk, VA 23508. The document should be in a Microsoft file (.doc or .xls format). Responses are due no later than 09 February 2015, 2:00 p.m. local time (EST). Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR15.208. Hand carried responses will be accepted. Proposals will be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “N62470-14-R-9007 DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM.” Point of Contact: Jen McDonald, Contract Specialist Phone: 757-322-8154 Fax: 757-322-4166 E-mail: jen.mcdonald@navy.mil

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published March 20, 2015  -  Deadline April 20, 2015
cpvs

N62470-15-R-5012 INDEFINITE DELIVERY / INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE. Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This notice will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineering (A and E) services for medical design projects located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Area of Responsibility, Worldwide. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods. The combined total amount that may be paid (including option years) will not exceed $25,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the entire contract term (including option years) is $5,000 and will be satisfied by the award of the initial Task Order. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to work load and/or satisfaction of the A and E performance under the subject contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year up to a maximum of $25,000,000 for the entire contract term. This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310 (Architectural Services) ($7,500,000). The firm selected will be the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. The type of design projects expected to be performed under this contract are 500 series facilities as defined by UFC 2-000-05N (hospitals, dental clinic, medical clinics, veterinary clinic, laboratories, etc.) and will be predominantly for MILCON projects, but may include special projects for sustainment, restoration and modernization and medical studies. Projects will be designed in accordance with criteria prescribed in the latest version of UFC 4-510-01 Military Medical Facilities and under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). Architect-Engineering and Engineering Services that may be required under this contract include DD Form 1391 documentation, Design-Build RFPs, Design-Bid-Build plans (AUTOCAD and BIM) and specifications (SPECSINTACT), cost estimates, related studies, field investigations, surveying and mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, conceptual designs, soil borings, hazardous materials identification, energy computation, life safety code studies, interior space comprehensive planning/design, conceptual designs, Defense Health medical studies (Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, Concept of Operations), value engineering, other associated engineering services, shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI), Commissioning, construction inspection and engineering consultation services during construction, and other related services. The services of qualified medical planner and medical equipment planner are required. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Standard Form 330 (SF 330) - The A and E must demonstrate the team’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria for all services as described above. Failure to provide complete submission information defined in the evaluation factors below may affect a firm’s qualification ratings. Evaluation criteria (1) through (3) are considered most important and are equal among themselves; criteria (4) through (6) are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; criteria (7) is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation criteria include: 1. Specialized Experience 2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence of the Individual Design Team Members 3. Past Performance 4. Quality Control 5. Program Management, Capacity and Location 6. Commitment to Small Business 7. Volume of Work Criterion 1- Specialized Experience (SF 330 Part 1 Section F): Offerors will be evaluated on specialized experience and technical competence of performance similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of: (a) experience with regard to medical treatment facilities design and construction (b) experience with multi-phased design and construction of additions to existing facilities or renovations of existing facilities performed within a operational medical facility or campus that had to comply with infection control, life safety and Interim Life Safety Measures in compliance with The Joint Commission (TJC), and had to address noise/vibration control issues; (c) experience with Defense Health medical studies; and (d) Experience applying sustainability concepts through an integrated, cost effective design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System. Submission requirements: Provide up to seven (7) relevant projects with the design completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. Provide at least: • one (1) medical design with a construction cost over $100M . • one (1) medical design with a construction cost over $30M, and • one (1) phased medical renovation design with a construction cost between $10M and $50M, If the project submitted was a Design-Bid-Build (full design), then the design must be complete. If the project was Design-Build (DB), the DB design documents must be complete; if the project was a DB RFP development then the DB RFP must be complete. Example projects must indicate the project’s size (SF or SM). Additional consideration may be given to Defense Health/Military Medical Facility projects. Additionally, provide at least • one (1) relevant medical study (e.g., Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, or Concept of Operations) completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. Additional consideration may be given to Defense Health/Military Medical studies. All projects provided in the SF 330 must be completed by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF 330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 “Firms from Section C Involved in this Project,” block (1). Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address, and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). Include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the value of the work they provided towards the performance of the overall project. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the offeror/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the offeror/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the offeror/team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. NOTE: If the Offeror is a joint venture, information must be submitted as a joint venture; however, if there is no information for the joint venture, information should be submitted for either joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of five (5) projects. Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part 1 Section F and shall be completed projects. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in Part 1, Section F of the SF 330. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation Criterion 1. Criterion 2 - Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF 330 Part 1, Section E and Section G): Offerors will be evaluated in terms of the professional qualifications and technical competence, by discipline, of the key personnel proposed to accomplish this work. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unique expertise and shall include as a minimum: program manager, medical planner, medical equipment planner, licensed fire protection engineer, certified or registered interior designer, architect, civil engineer, structural engineer, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer, cost estimator, and scheduler. Failure to provide a balanced cadre of personnel in the areas and disciplines listed above will result in the firm being considered not qualified. Submission Requirements: Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel. Resumes are limited to one page each and should cite project specific experience in the areas noted above within the seven (7) years prior to the date of issuance of this Notice; indicate proposed role in this contract; professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; and indicate role expected to play in this contract and roles they played in the projects addressed in Evaluation Criterion (1). Differentiate between planning and design experience. Criterion 3 - Past Performance (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): Offerors will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS/ACASS for Criterion 1 projects and may include other information provided by the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight. Submission Requirements: SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER CRITERION 1. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS IS AVAILABLE. IF A CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF 330. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, offerors should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Offerors should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race via email at heather.race@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Criterion 4 -Quality Control Program (SF 330 Part 1, Section H): Offerors will be evaluated on the strength of the Quality Control (QC) program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products under this contract, on the acceptability of the internal quality control program used to ensure technical accuracy and assure overall coordination of plans and specifications, and on their means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors. Submission Requirements: Discuss the QC program that would be utilized for this contract and the management approach to quality control, processes and procedures. The plan shall contain an explanation of the management approach and an organizational chart showing the inter-relationship of management and team components and shall discuss specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract. Identify the QC Manager and any other key personnel responsible for the program and discuss authorities assigned to the individual(s). Discuss how the Offeror’ s program extends to subcontractors. Criterion 5 - Program Management, Capacity and Location (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): Offerors will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and locations of offices that will be available to perform work under this contract. Submission Requirements: Address the following: (a) Provide a staffing and management plan for this contract. Provide an organization chart of the firm and indicate the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable. Teams with a demonstrated history of working together may be considered more favorably; (b) Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services; (c) Describe proposed location of the program management office and other office locations and how this will be advantageous to the Government. Due to the worldwide coverage of this contract, offices in multiple locations may be considered an advantage. Criterion 6 - Commitment to Small Business (SF 330 Part 1, Section H): Offerors will be evaluated in terms of their extent to identify and commit to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all offerors shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Business offerors shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, large business offerors shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Business offerors shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals for FY2015 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals: FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 SB 66.80% 66.94% 67.07% 67.20% 67.33% HubZone 8.94% 9.03% 9.12% 9.21% 9.30% SDB 17.27% 17.44% 17.62% 17.79% 17.97% WOSB 15.30% 15.45% 15.61% 15.77% 15.93% SDVOSB 3.03% 3.06% 3.09% 3.12% 3.15% VOSB 3.03% 3.06% 3.09% 3.12% 3.15% If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small business offerors; however, small business offerors shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract. The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310, Architectural and Engineering Services, size standard $7,500,000. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large business offerors to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template. Criterion 7 -Volume of Work (SF 330 Part 1, Section H): Firms/teams will be evaluated in terms of volume of DoD work previously awarded to the firm within the past 12 months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DOD A and E contracts among qualified A and E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. Submission requirements: Indicate the dollar amount of DoD contracts awarded within the past 12 months. Joint ventures should list award amount to the JV entity and separately list award amounts to each individual JV member for that time period. SELECTION INTERVIEW: Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to explain or expand on information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the DOD CCR Website: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (i.e., state registration number, or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in an offeror’s elimination from consideration. FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE SHOULD INCLUDE WITH THEIR SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM FURTHER EVALUATION. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point font or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 x 11 inch pages (the 75 page limit does not include the ISRs or Draft Subcontracting Plan, as required by Criterion 6, (Small Business Subcontracting Effort). Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Interested firms shall submit six (6) hard copies of the SF-330 and six (6) CDs to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic, Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508. Responses are due no later than 20 April 2015 at 1400 local time (EDT). Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Point of Contact at NAVFAC-Atlantic is either Heather Race, Contract Specialist, at 757-322-8130 or Lisa Sumpter, Supervisory Contract Specialist, at 757-322-4083. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. If a SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (i.e., state registration number). The organizational chart can be on one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 pitch/point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables), and Part I shall not exceed seventy-five (75) pages in total. The seventy-five page (75) limitation does not include cover sheets or divider sheets, provided that these do not include any information regarding the capability of the company, or any information submitted in response to a question or requirement from the synopsis.. If a cover sheet or divider sheet includes any information determined by the Contracting Officer to be substantially answering a question or requirement in the synopsis or explaining company capability, it will be counted as a page toward the seventy-five (75) page limit. Project past performance questionnaires (PPQs), Small Business Subcontracting Plan, Small Business Individual Subcontracting Reports are not included within the seventy-five (75) page restriction of the SF330. NOTE: If hand-carrying or express mailing proposal, the offeror is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly. All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass and ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: RAPIDGATE badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA. Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Excel spreadsheet). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department via email: 1. Iris Gholston (757) 322-8116 / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil 2. Steven K. Anderson (757) 322-8115 / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department at least 5 working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check. Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA. Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA: Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Heather Race at heather.race@navy.mil. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.