Public tenders for architect, architecture in Hickam-housing United States

Find all Architecture tenders in the world.
Finding business opportunities has never been easier.

Results for architecture. Make a new search!

C--Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Architect-Engineer Services For Architectural Projects at Various Locations, NAVFAC HAWAII Areas

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published October 29, 2015  -  Deadline December 2, 2015
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFCATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This solicitation is a 100% set-aside for small business concerns. The small business standard classification is NAICS 541310 ($7.5M in annual receipts over the past three years). Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract to include design and engineering services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii. Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii. Services shall also include Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD)/design charrettes; preparation of engineering studies; construction cost estimates; cost certification; Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) solicitation documents; Design-Bid-Build (DBB)/Final plans and specifications contract documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographical survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, historic preservation, anti-terrorism/force protection and others; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID), including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF and E); as-built drawings; Post Construction Award Services (PCAS); and other miscellaneous services, as required. PCAS consist of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, site visits, operations and maintenance support information, record drawings, and other miscellaneous services. Architectural projects consist of, but are not limited to, design and engineering for new construction, alterations, repair of buildings, structures and minor construction of bachelor quarters, admin/training facilities, fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, industrial shops, maintenance shops, distribution warehouses, and armories. Supporting facilities may include utility connections (water, sewers, electrical, telecommunications, and cable television). Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate its qualifications with respect to the published selection criteria. The following selection criteria, in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate the qualifications of the A-E firms: Criterion (1). Professional qualifications and specialized experience and technical competence of key personnel proposed. (a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for the design team. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part I, Section H. Identify key personnel for the design team proposed for the design of base development facility projects. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. (b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of base development facility projects, approximately $30 million or less in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten years, including specified design and engineering services. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area with demonstrated understanding of facility sustainment specifically regarding energy savings will be considered more favorably. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section E. Each Section E shall include a maximum of five completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. Professional services of projects submitted must have been completed within the past ten years. Criterion (2). Firm’s specialized recent experience. Firm’s specialized recent experience in the design of base development facility projects, not more than $30 million in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten years, including specified design and engineering services. Relevant base development facility projects shall include bachelor enlisted quarters, apartments, dormitories, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory for new building construction or building alterations, renovations and repairs type projects in Hawaii and similar tropical environments in the Pacific Ocean area. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and similar environments in the Pacific Ocean area will be considered more favorably. NOTE: A subcontractors or subconsultants specialized experience will not be given the same level of consideration as the prime contractor. Prime contractor-subcontractors with a demonstrated history of working successfully together on prior projects may be considered more favorably than those without such history. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section F. For the proposed team, provide in Section F a maximum of ten completed relevant projects which best demonstrate the firm’s recent specialized experience in the design of base development facility projects AND the specified design and engineering services, described above. Professional services of relevant projects submitted must have been completed within the past ten years. If more than ten projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first ten projects and disregard any other project information after the first ten projects. Relevant projects shall be architectural or multi-disciplinary projects in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Pacific Ocean areas. Each project shall include (1) project title; (2) location; (3) year completed; (4) project owner; (5) point-of-contact name, e-mail address, and phone number; (6) contract number or project identification number; (7) contract period of performance; (8) contract award amount; and (9) description of project and relevance to this solicitation. A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. For IDIQs, the Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract and will only evaluate individual task order information. The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating the offeror’s specialized experience. Section F, Block 25, item (3) ROLE, shall clearly identify the prime contractor (e.g., ROLE, Architect prime contractor). Criterion (3). Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of quality of work, cost control, compliance with performance schedules, and cooperation and responsiveness. Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant base development facility projects with respect to work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and cooperation and responsiveness. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in Section F pertaining to Criterion (2), Firm’s Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from NECO website https://www.neco.navy.mil) and submit the Performance Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. Past performance information not related to the projects described to meet Criterion (2) will not be considered. The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Governments evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the SF330 and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS/CPARS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the DUNS number provided for the firm. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. A subcontractors or subconsultants past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as the prime contractor. Criterion (4). Capacity to perform the work in the required time and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. Address staffing and capacity to accomplish the work under this IDIQ contract. Address how the firm’s organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. Identify team composition (prime A-E firm, subcontractor/sub-consultant of major design disciplines, and other required design firms) and personnel (key personnel and other personnel of major design disciplines only). For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion (1), explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and sub-consultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5). Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach including knowledge of most current LEED certification process. Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or equivalent. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide specific examples on a maximum of five completed projects that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Provide a maximum of five projects that have attained or been submitted for LEED certification. For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the team’s major contribution(s) (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. LEED certified projects will be considered more favorably than projects not yet certified. Discuss key LEED personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion (6). A-E’s Design Quality Control Program (DQCP). Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal design quality control program used to ensure technical accuracy of drawings, specifications, cost estimates and other required technical data. Describe the design quality control organization structure; and list the responsible personnel. Discuss the methodology that will be used to eliminate errors, omissions, interferences, and inconsistencies between all design disciplines and consultants; inconsistencies between drawings, specifications, and cost estimates; and for the incorporation of the latest criteria, lessons learned and review comments. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime A-E will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team’s quality control processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion (7). Firm’s location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project; SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Indicate location of office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area. Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support. Criterion (8). Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Include the following items in Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. The planned contract type is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract where work will be ordered via task orders on an as-needed basis during the life of the contract provided the Government and the contractor agree on the amount. Each task order will be a firm fixed price A-E contract. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of initial contract award with four (4) additional one-year option periods. The total amount that may be paid under this contract (including option years) will not exceed $10,000,000 for the entire contract term. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to workload and/or acceptable A-E performance under the subject contract. There will be no future synopsis in the event the options are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000 and will be satisfied by the award of the initial Task Order or with a seed project negotiated and awarded concurrently with the basic IDIQ contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Estimated construction cost of project is between $25,000 and $30,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is March 2016. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. The selected A-E firm may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300 Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates may be tasked to assist in the preparation of a statement of work, a plan, or a specification for a construction project. This includes concept design, project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD 1391), facility studies, environment assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Alice Mende, Alice.Mende@navy.mil. Questions submitted within 15 days of the closing date may not be answered by the Government. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website, https://www.neco.navy.mil or Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this pre-solicitation notice. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 10-point font size, and one-sided. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. Two copies of your SF 330 are required: One paper copy and one electronic copy on a CD. The submittal/delivery address is Commander, NAVFAC HAWAII (Code OPHA1), 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3139, (A-E Solicitation No. N62478-16-R-5025). You may also hand deliver your SF 330 to Building A-13 (please call Ms. Alice Mende at (808) 474-2365 to make arrangements to hand deliver). The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict security measures are in force and delays should be anticipated. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via e-mail; therefore, e-mail address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. Firms responding to this announcement by Wednesday, December 2, 2015 will be considered. Firms must submit forms by 2:00 p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (HST). This is not a request for a proposal. Point of Contact is Ms. Alice Mende, Contracting Officer, Phone (808) 474-2365, email alice.mende@navy.mil.

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND, PACIFIC

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 13, 2015  -  Deadline June 18, 2015
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFCATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Architect-Engineer (A-E) services are required for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract to include design and engineering services for architectural projects at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Pacific. Design and engineering services consist of, but are not limited to, the execution and delivery of Military Construction (MILCON) project documentation (DD Form 1391); Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD)/design charrettes; Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) solicitation documents; Design-Bid-Build (DBB)/Final Design contract documents; technical surveys and reports including site engineering investigation, topographical survey, geotechnical investigation, hazardous material survey, Munitions of Explosive Concern (MEC) survey, and others; construction cost estimates; Comprehensive Interior Design (CID) including Structural Interior Design (SID) and Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF and E); and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS). PCAS consist of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to, review of construction submittals, site visits, operations and maintenance support information, record drawings, and other miscellaneous services. Architectural projects consist of new construction of base development facilities, including, but not limited to, bachelor enlisted quarters, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory. Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate its qualifications with respect to the published selection criteria for all services. The following selection criteria, in descending order of importance, will be used to evaluate the qualifications of the A-E firms: Criterion 1. Firm’s Specialized Experience: Firms recent specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects, $20 million or more in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten (10) years, including specified design and engineering services. Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation. Relevant base development facility projects shall include new bachelor enlisted quarters, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for new base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Guam and Hawaii (subject to high winds and corrosion) will be considered more favorably. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section F. Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant projects, $20 million or more in construction value, completed in the past ten (10) years, which best demonstrates the firm’s recent specialized experience in the design of new base development facility projects AND the specified design and engineering services, described above. If more than five projects are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first five projects listed in Part I, Section F and disregard any other project information. Each project shall include (1) project title; (2) location; (3) year completed; (4) project owner; (5) point-of-contact name, e-mail address, and phone number; (6) contract number or project identification number; (7) contract period of performance; (8) contract award amount; and (9) description of project and relevance to this solicitation. A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. For IDIQs, the Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract and will only evaluate individual task order information. The submission shall include a discussion of who executed the project as pertinent to demonstrating the offeror’s specialized experience. If a project was performed by a joint venture (JV), and all JV partners are not on the team proposed for this solicitation, the offeror should specifically address the work performed on the project submitted by the proposed JV partner(s). If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the proposed JV partner(s), the project will be evaluated less favorably. Likewise, if the proposed JV partner(s) worked as a subcontractor on a project, the offeror should specifically address the work performed by the proposed JV partner(s) on the project submitted. If a project does not provide requested data, accessible point-of-contact, or valid phone number, that project may be evaluated less favorably. Note: If the A-E firm is a JV, info should be submitted for projects performed by the JV; however, if there are no recent relevant projects performed by the JV, submit projects performed by the individual partner entities of the JV. A subcontractors or subconsultants specialized experience will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the JV partner(s). Prime contractor-subcontractor/JVs/LLCs/LTDs with a demonstrated history of working successfully together on prior projects may be considered more favorably than those without such history. Criterion 2. Key Personnel’s Professional Qualifications, and Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: (a) Professional Qualifications: Professional qualifications of key personnel proposed for two (2) design teams. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Identify key personnel for two (2) design teams proposed for the design of new base development facility projects. See Selection Criteria 1 for description of base development facility projects. Key personnel for each team shall be limited to the following: Principal-in-Charge of the prime A-E firm, Project Manager or Project Architect, Civil Project Engineer, Structural Project Engineer, Mechanical Project Engineer, Electrical Project Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, and Cost Estimator. SF330, Part I, Section E. Submit professional qualifications for these key personnel, including active U.S. professional registration (include State and discipline), number of years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. For Cost Estimator, indicate years of experience, role in this contract, firm name and location, and education. Professional registration for Cost Estimator is not required. Professional qualifications of personnel of the design teams other than the key personnel (e.g., Architect, Structural Engineer, Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Geotechnical Engineer, Topographic Surveyor, etc.) shall not be submitted, and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation. (b) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel specialized experience and technical competence in the design of new base development facility projects, approximately $20 million or more in construction value per project/contract, completed within the past ten (10) years, including specified design and engineering services. Relevant base development facility projects shall include new bachelor enlisted quarters, consolidated club (officer/enlisted), fire station, fitness center, dining facility, auditorium/theater, exchange/retail store, school, headquarters building, administration building, aircraft hangar, maintenance shop, distribution warehouse, and armory. Submission of more variety in the types of base development facility projects will be more favorably considered. Repair and alteration projects shall not be considered in the evaluation. Specified design and engineering services shall include execution of DD 1391 or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents. Specified design and engineering services for new base development facility projects do not have to be within a single project scope; however, base development facility projects that contain several or all of these services will be given more favorable consideration than projects that contain only individual services. Base development facility projects designed and constructed in tropical environments similar to Guam and Hawaii (subject to high winds and corrosion) will be considered more favorably. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section E. Specialized experience and technical competence shall be limited to the two (2) Project Architects. Relevant project information for other key personnel is not required and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation. For these other key personnel, complete Blocks 12 through 18; and leave Block 19, Relevant Projects, blank. Complete one Section E for each Project Architect, providing all requested information. Submit a maximum of three (3) projects for new base development facilities for each Project Architect, demonstrating experience in the specified design and engineering services (execution of DD 1391’s or similar project programming document, FACD/design charrettes, DB RFP solicitation documents, and DBB/Final Design contract documents). A project is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. If more than three projects for each Project Architect are submitted, the Government will evaluate the first three projects listed in Part I, Section E and disregard any other project information. Each project shall include project title and location, year completed, brief description, point-of-contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, and the role and experience the Project Architect had in performing the project. If a project description does not clearly define the work performed by the Project Architect (including the specialized design and engineering service) or if a project does not provide the requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers, that project may be evaluated less favorably. Criterion 3. Past Performance: Firms will be evaluated on past performance on relevant base development facility projects with respect to work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and cooperation and responsiveness. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. For each relevant base development facility project submitted for Criterion (1), Firm’s Specialized Experience, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect-Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from NECO, https://www.neco.navy.mil) and submit the Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design-build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a sub-contractor. Past performance information not related to the projects described to meet Criterion (1) will not be considered. The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS), and inquiries with previous customers/owners. PPIRS/ACASS will be evaluated for the firm that will perform the work and search will be based upon the DUNS number provided for the firm. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. Letters of commendation or awards are not required, and if submitted, shall not be considered in the evaluation. A subcontractors or subconsultants past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the JV partner(s). Criterion 4. Capacity to perform the work in the required time and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. Address staffing and capacity to accomplish the work under this IDIQ contract. Address how the firms organizational construct is most efficient and effective in the execution of work. Assume two (2) separate design teams will execute two (2) large projects concurrently. Identify team composition (prime A-E firm, subcontractor/subconsultant of major design disciplines, and other required design firms) and personnel (key personnel and other personnel of major design disciplines only). For all key personnel identified in Selection Criterion 2, explain their roles and responsibilities in the proposed organization. If the same key personnel are proposed for more than one (1) design team, provide explanation substantiating such designation and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and subconsultants for the specified performance period. Criterion 5. Sustainable Design: Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or equivalent. Provide a maximum of three (3) projects that have attained or been submitted for LEED certification. For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the teams major contribution(s) (design elements, features, equipment, etc.) in attainment of the certification. If more than three projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first three projects and disregard any other project information after the first three projects. LEED certified projects will be considered more favorably than projects not yet certified. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide specific examples on a maximum of three (3) completed projects that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Discuss key LEED personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion 6. Design Quality Control Program (DQCP): Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal design quality control program used to ensure technical accuracy of drawings, specifications, cost estimates and other required technical data. Describe the design quality control organization structure; and list the responsible personnel. Discuss the methodology that will be used to eliminate errors, omissions, interferences, and inconsistencies between all design disciplines and consultants; inconsistencies between drawings, specifications, and cost estimates; and for the incorporation of the latest criteria, lessons learned and review comments. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime A-E will ensure quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team’s QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion 7. Small Business Utilization. Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which their submissions demonstrate the identification and utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone), Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on two sub-criteria: Sub-criteria A - Past performance in utilization of small business concerns. Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which small businesses were utilized, and that assigned small business goals were achieved on previous contracts and/or on the extent that small businesses were utilized on projects in which no goals were assigned. Firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI. Large Business offerors shall submit three (3) final or most recent Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size. If ISRs are not final or most recent, they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals on the submitted ISRs were not met, provide an explanation for each missed goal. If ISRs were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, submit other documentation which demonstrates utilization of the various small business category firms for the contracts. If small businesses were not utilized, provide a detailed explanation. A sample template for subcontracting history for newly established large businesses or large businesses with no prior ISR history is provided as Attachment 1. Small business offerors shall submit documentation which shows utilization of the various small business category firms for similar contracts of relative size. Note that small business offerors can and should include self-performed work for this sub-criteria. Small business offerors are also encouraged to utilize the sample template included as Attachment 1 to provide the required small business past performance information. Sub-criteria B - Utilization and participation of small business concerns for this contract. All offerors shall provide information regarding the participation of small business concerns in this contract. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of total proposed price, the extent of work to be performed as the prime contractor and the planned usage of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Identify each subconsultant by name, discipline and size status. Utilize $10,000,000 as the total proposed price. The following FY 2015 NAVFAC goals are provided in terms of total planned subcontracting value for utilization of small businesses. SB: 66.8%, HUBZone: 8.94%, SDB: 17.27%, WOSB: 15.30%, SDVOSB: 3.03%. Demonstrate how you plan to meet or exceed these goals. Large and Small Businesses that are slated shall: i) Large Business offerors will be required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan including goals proposed for each small business category and all other program requirements per FAR 52.219-9 prior to the interview. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan template, Attachment 2, shall be used to complete the subcontracting plan submission. Firms shall submit their Small Business Subcontracting Plan utilizing this template, and only this template. ii) Small Business offerors shall submit a Small Business Participation Plan, using the template at Attachment 3. Small businesses can and should include planned self-performed work in Attachment 3. Small business offerors are not to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, but shall utilize the template included as Attachment 3 to submit the required subcontracting participation information. Criterion 8. Firms location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Indicate location of office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area (e.g., Hawaii, Guam and other areas in the Pacific Ocean). Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on-site support. Criterion 9. Volume of Work: Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense (DoD) within the past 12 months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DoD A and E contracts among qualified A and E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office was awarded the contract/task order. This announcement is being solicited on an unrestricted basis and open to large and small business concerns. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541310. The Small Business size standard is $7.5 million average annual receipts over the past 3 years. GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN OBSERVERS: When approved at a Level Above the Contracting Officer, the resultant contract may issue task orders that are funded by the Government of Japan. Firms are advised that officials of the Government of Japan (GOJ) will be observing the slate-selection process, the evaluation of SF 330s and the review of other documentation. Accordingly, submissions in response to this synopsis will be considered evidence of your consent and permission for the Contracting Officer to reveal your submission to participating GOJ officials (who will sign Non-Disclosure Statements that will be retained in the contract files). Include the following items in Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. The planned contract type is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract where work will be ordered via task orders on an as-needed basis during the life of the contract provided the Government and the contractor agree on the amount. Each task order will be a firm fixed price A-E contract. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of initial contract award with four (4) additional one-year option periods. The total amount that may be paid under this contract (including option years) will not exceed $30,000,000 for the entire contract term. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to workload and/or acceptable A-E performance under the subject contract. There will be no synopsis in the event the options are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000 and will be satisfied by the award of the initial Task Order. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Estimated award timeframe is November 2015. This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. JVs (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Partnerships (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities: a. A copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement. b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate: (1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing. (2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control. (3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work. (4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents). c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number. The selected A-E firm may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within twenty days of the meeting. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300 Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates may be tasked to assist in the preparation of a statement of work, a plan, or a specification for a construction project. This includes concept design, project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and subconsultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. Notifications will be sent via email; therefore, please include an email address in Block 8 of the SF 330. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Annette Tijerina, annette.tijerina@navy.mil. Questions submitted within 15 days of the closing date may not be answered by the Government. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website, https://www.neco.navy.mil or Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this pre-solicitation notice. A-E firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications to the office shown below. SF330, Part II, shall be submitted for each firm identified in Part I, Section C. The printed format shall be in an 8-1/2 x 11 paper format, bound in a 3-ring binder, typed with a minimum 10-point font size, and one-sided. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. Submit an original and three (3) paper copies and one (1) electronic copy on a CD of the SF330 are required. Responses are due no later than 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on 18 June 2015. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows: (1) For SF 330s being sent via United States Postal Services (USPS): Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch Code ACQ31:AT (N62742-15-R-0004) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 JBPHH, HI 96860-3134 (2) For SF 330s being sent via courier service or hand-delivered: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch Code ACQ31:AT (N62742-15-R-0004) 4262 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE, WITH EMPHASIS IN THE PACIFIC AND INDIAN OCEAN AREAS

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published December 2, 2015  -  Deadline January 14, 2016
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services are required for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contact for Planning and Engineering services located primarily in the Pacific and Indian Ocean areas, but may also include work worldwide. Services required under this contract include the preparation of various U.S. Navy and Marine Corps installation-specific (one Host Installation Command or tenant within that Installation) or facility specific (single facility or multiple facilities of the same functional type/use) planning studies or programming documents, and on limited occasions, related technical services and environmental documents/studies under the cognizance of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific. Services may also include projects at various Military Commands and Agencies (such as, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, U.S. Coast Guard, and other U.S. Agencies) worldwide. The primary tasks anticipated under this contract include, but are not limited to: Regional Integration Plans (RIP); Shore Infrastructure Plans (SIP); Installation Development Plans (IDP); Area Development Plans; Sustainable Design and Urbanism Planning; Healthy Community Planning; Recapitalization Planning; Form-based Planning; Capital Improvement Plans; Maintenance and Sustainment Plans; Transportation/Circulation Plans; Siting/Land Use Studies; Special Planning Studies; Asset Utilization Studies; Functional Studies; Anti-Terrorism/Force-Protection (AT/FP) Studies and Project Documents; Military Training Studies; Air Installations Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Studies; Range Installation Compatible Use Zone (RAICUZ) Studies; Airfield and/or Waterfront Studies; Encroachment Action Plans; Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Studies; Facilitation of Visioning and Scenario Planning Workshops and/or Design/Planning Charrettes; Facilities Requirements Plan (FRP); Military Construction (MILCON) and Special Projects documentation (normally on Department of Defense Standard Form 1391) with supporting documents (such as, Cost Estimate (first-cost and life-cycle-cost), Budget Estimate Summary Sheet (BESS), Team 1391 Checklist, NAVFAC 1391 Checklist, Site Plans, Location Map, Utilities Site Plan, Floor Plans, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation, etc.); Host Nation Funded (HNF) Construction Project Documents/Demolition Documents; System Safety documents; Site Approval Requests; Geospatial Information and Services. The secondary tasks anticipated under this contract may include: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Project Documents; Business Case Analysis; Economic Analysis and Facility Life Cycle Studies; Preliminary and Parametric Cost Estimates; Engineering and Architectural Studies; Landscape Architecture Plans; Real Estate Analysis; Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) Studies; Land Inventory Analyses; Land Survey and Topographic Mapping; Environmental Studies; Hazardous Material (HAZMAT) Test and Abatement Studies; Renewable Energy Research and Analysis; U.S. National Environmental Preservation Act (NEPA) documentation/studies (Record of Categorical Exclusion (RCE), Environmental Assessment (EA), Overseas Environmental Assessment (OEA), Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), Notice of Intent, Preliminary Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives (DOPAA), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Record of Decision (ROD), Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (OEIS); Environmental Review analyses and documentation, natural and cultural resources studies, conservation/preservation plans, socio-economic impact analyses, repatriation studies/plans. All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local policy, guidance, regulations, and laws including, but not limited to the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), Department of Defense Instructions (DoDI), Chief of Naval Operations Instructions (OPNAVINST), and Naval Facilities Engineering Command Instructions (NAVFACINST) and Programs. Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate its and each key consultant’s qualifications with respect to the published selection criteria for all services. The following selection criteria 1 thru 7 are listed below in descending order of importance: 1. Specialized recent experience (within ten (10) years) and technical competence of the firm in the following types of planning documents and related technical services: a. Installation and Regional Planning (such as RIP, SIP, IDP, Encroachment Action Plans, Functional Studies, Traffic/Parking/Circulation Plans, Siting/Land Use Studies) b. Facility Requirements Plan (FRP) updates to the Navy’s Shore Facilities Planning System c. Project Planning Documentation for MILCON, Special Projects, and Host Nation Construction Program projects. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section F). The submission should include a maximum of five (5) relevant projects demonstrating specialized experience of the proposed team in provision of the services noted in Criterion 1 (a, b, and c) above. The projects shall have been performed for the U.S. Military, for an A-E fee of $400,000.00 or more for each project, and completed within the 10 years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice. Projects that comply with the requirements of UFC 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning and the NAVFAC Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide or Marine Corps Order 11000.12 Real Property Facilities Manual, Facilities Planning and Programming will be evaluated more favorably. Projects for the U.S. Navy or U.S. Marine Corps will be evaluated more favorably than projects completed for other branches of the U.S. military or other government agencies. Projects within the Pacific and Indian Ocean areas will be evaluated more favorably than projects conducted in other geographic regions. Specialized experience of the prime firm will be evaluated more favorably than that of the subconsultants. Ensure that each project cited is either a standalone contract for a single tasking or a single task/delivery order on an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract. If more than five projects are provided, only the first five will be considered. Projects that have not been completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. 2. Professional Qualifications of Key Personnel. Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications and competence of the proposed key personnel to provide services to accomplish tasks required under this contract. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT (SF330 Part 1 Sections E, G, and D): a. Key Personnel Resumes: Provide resumes for a maximum of four key personnel (Project Manager, Senior Planner, Planner, GIS Specialist) to be assigned to this contract. For each key personnel, identify active professional registration or certification, area of expertise and demonstrated experience, role expected to play in this contract, and describe the roles they performed in a maximum of five completed U.S. Military projects relevant to Selection Criterion 1. Ensure that each project cited is either a standalone contract for a single tasking, or a single task/delivery order on an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract. Experience in U.S. Navy or U.S. Marine Corps projects will be evaluated more favorably than experience with projects performed for other branches of the U.S. military or other government agencies. Project experience within the Pacific and Indian Ocean areas will be evaluated more favorably than experience in projects conducted in other geographic regions. Personnel of the prime contractor will be evaluated more favorably than that of the subconsultants. Resumes for key personnel are limited to two (2) pages each. Any pages over this limit will not be considered. b. Organizational Chart of Proposed Team: In a consolidated organizational chart, identify each of the four key personnel in the firm’s hierarchy. Also identify personnel from each of the following disciplines who will provide supporting services for this contract. a) Architecture b) Civil engineering c) Mechanical engineering d) Fire protection e) Electrical engineering f) Structural engineering g) Traffic engineering h) Acoustical engineering i) Ocean engineering j) Environmental engineering k) Explosive safety analysis l) Fuels Specialist m) Waterfront Operations Specialist n) Airfield Operations Specialist o) Archaeology/Cultural resources management p) Natural resources management q) Historical architecture r) Cost estimating s) Charrette facilitation If any of the key personnel or supporting disciplines being provided by subconsultant firms, identify the link between the prime and subconsultant personnel, designating the team member, firm, and capability each will provide for this contract. The chart shall be submitted on a single 11” x 17” sized sheet and use a font size of 10 points or larger. Resumes of personnel providing supporting services (items a through s above) are not required and will not be evaluated. 3. Past Performance. A-E firms will be evaluated based on past performance on projects relevant to selection criterion (1) above with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Past performance information not related to the projects related selection criterion (1) will not be considered. The A-E shall provide ACASS performance documentation or similar for each project. If an ACASS performance documentation or similar for each project is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from the NECO website) and submit the Survey with the SF330). The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. In evaluating past performance, the Government may consider information in the A-E’s SF330 and information gathered from other sources including former customers, Government agencies, federal databases and other references. The info provided by the A-E may provide the major portion of the information used in the Governments evaluation for past performance. The Government, however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources to assess past performance info such as the Past Performance Info Retrieval System (PPIRS), A-E Contract Administration Support System (ACASS), and inquiries with previous customers/owners. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section H). If an A-E is utilizing past performance information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies, the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance info of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The information submitted shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the submitted information will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will perform the contract requirements. The SF330 shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the A-E for future task orders in performance of the contract. A subcontractors or subconsultants past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner because there is no direct legal relationship between the Government and the subcontractor/subconsultant. The Government will consider the past performance and experience of a subcontractor/subconsultant where the prime contractor provides, in its SF330, evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the prime contractor and the subcontractor/subconsultant to enter into a subcontract. However, the level of consideration will depend on the extent to which the A-E demonstrates the prime contractors commitment to award a subcontract to the subcontractor/subconsultant and subcontractors/subconsultants commitment to enter into a subcontract with the prime contractor, including legal accountability for both parties. Prime contractor-subcontractor/subconsultant teams/Joint Ventures/LLCs/LTDs with a demonstrated history of working successfully together on prior projects may be considered more favorably than those without such history. 4. Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section H). Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Describe the firm’s ability to perform and manage multiple complex projects in different locations and the ability to surge to meet unexpected demands. Describe the firm’s ability to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of service with minimal disruption to projects initiated under other NAVFAC PAC contracts/task orders. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and subconsultants for the specified performance period. 5. Quality Control Program. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section H). Briefly describe how the prime ensures quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team’s QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. 6. A-E Firm’s Location: A-E firms will be evaluated on the locations of the office or offices from which the A-E firm will perform the work under this contract. Locations within the general geographical area of the work and knowledge of the locality of the work (e.g., Hawaii, Guam, and other areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR) will be evaluated. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section H). Indicate the location of the office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area (e.g., Hawaii, Guam, and other areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR). Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on site support. 7. Volume of Work: A-E firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the A-E firm by Department of Defense (DoD) within the past 12 months, with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (SF330, Part 1, Section H). Provide a list of DoD contracts or task orders awarded in the past 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. If the firm performed work as a subcontractor, indicate the contract and/or task order of the prime contractor and the estimated amount completed as the subcontractor. A-E firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. This procurement is being solicited on a 100% set-aside for small business concerns; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from only small business concerns. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541310. The Small Business size standard is $7.5 million average annual receipts over the past three years. Estimated date of contract award is August 2016. Work under this IDIQ contract will be issued by firm-fixed price task orders. The contract term will be a base year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $20,000,000. The options may be exercised within the timeframe specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to the workload and/or satisfactory performance by the A-E under the contract. There will be no synopsis in the event the options included in the contract are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. The contract will be of the Indefinite Quantity type where the work will be required on an as needed basis during the life of the contract providing the government and contractor agree on the amount. Each project contract will be a firm fixed price A-E Contract. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render the A-E ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website: https://www.sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications is also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (May 2014). For technical SAM help, contact the SAM help desk at www.fsd.gov. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Partnerships (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities: a. A copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement. b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate: (1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing. (2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control. (3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work. (4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents). c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number. The government will put more importance on criteria performed in whole or in part by the prime contractor vice a subcontractor. Submittals that do not include responses addressing ALL elements of the criteria stated above must include an explanation why that element is not addressed. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Annette Tijerina, annette.tijerina@navy.mil and Lorna Sikorski, lorna.sikorski@navy.mil, no later than 16 December 2015. Questions submitted after 16 December 2015 may not be addressed due to time constraints. Verbal queries will not be entertained. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the NECO website, https://www.neco.navy.mil/, or Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this presolicitation notice. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract Architect-Engineer (A and E) services for Planning and Engineering services located in the Pacific and Indian Ocean areas, but may also include work worldwide, and will be procured in accordance with the Brooks Act as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Standard Form 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly-qualified firm based on criterion responses. Failure to provide requested data or to comply with the instructions in this notice could result in a firm being considered less qualified or eliminated from consideration. Brooks Act (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The A and E must demonstrate the team’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria. Failure to provide complete submission information defined in the evaluation factors below may affect a firm’s qualification ratings. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Include a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria. If necessary, continue on plain bond paper. The SF 330 shall be typed and one-sided (8.5 x 11 inches) pages. Include the following items on the SF330, Part 1, Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. This announcement requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via email, therefore, please include an email address on the SF 330, Part I, Section B8. In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E firm must be a registered /licensed architect and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award of this contract and must submit proof (i.e. State registration number, a brief explanation of the A-E firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.) with the SF 330. Failure to submit the required proof may result in an A-E’s elimination from consideration. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. A-E firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330, A-E Qualifications to the office shown below. SF330, Part II, shall be submitted for each firm that will be part of the team proposed and identified in Part I. Submit three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy on a CD of Parts I and II are required. Firms responding to this announcement by 14 January 2016, 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) will be considered. This is not a request for a proposal. (1) For SF330s being sent via United States Postal Services (USPS): Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31:AT) N62742-16-R-0200 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 JBPHH, HI 96860-3134 (2) For SF330s being hand-delivered or Private Courier: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31:AT) N62742-16-R-0200 4262 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

C--Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Architect-Engineer Services For Various Structural Projects and Other Projects under the Cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published April 29, 2015  -  Deadline May 29, 2015
cpvs

This solicitation is a 100% set-aside for Small Business concerns. The small business size standard classification is NAICS 541330 ($14 M in annual receipts over the past three years). Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for projects that involve repair, alteration, maintenance and structural design and engineering involvement, such as waterfront facilities (piers, wharves and dry-docks), building, and structures at various locations under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Hawaii. A-E services include, but are not limited to the execution and delivery of Design-Build (DB) Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation documents; Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Design contract documents; technical surveys and reports including concept studies, site engineering investigation, topographical survey, geotechnical investigation, construction cost estimates, Post Construction Award Services (PCAS). PCAS consists of technical consultation during construction, including, but not limited to review of construction submittals, site visits, operations and maintenance support information, record drawings, and other miscellaneous services. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the A-E contractor shall identify and provide recommendations for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. The contract will be of the Indefinite Quantity type where the work will be required on an as needed basis during the life of the contract providing the government and contractor agree on the amount. Each project contract will be a firm fixed price A-E Contract. The Government will determine the delivery order amount by using rates negotiated and negotiate the effort required to perform the particular project. The contract term will be for a base plus four option periods. The Government reserves the right to exercise the option to extend the contract term. The maximum value for the contract inclusive of all options shall not exceed $10,000,000. The Government guarantees a minimum of $10,000. There will be no future synopsis in the event the options included in the contract are exercised. Estimated construction cost of project is between $25,000 and $25,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is September 2015. Proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The following selection evaluation criteria, in order of importance, will be used in the evaluation of A-E firms: Criterion (1). Professional qualifications of firm and staff proposed for the design of the repair, alteration, maintenance and structural engineering investigation of Navy-type shore facilities such as waterfront facilities (piers, wharves and dry-docks), buildings, and structures, including underwater inspections and geotechnical investigations in tropical environments similar to Hawaii. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (a) SF330, Part 1, Section E. Key personnel shall be proposed. Complete one Section E for each key personnel, providing all requested information. For Section E, Block 13, specify the role of the key personnel proposed for this project, e.g., Principal, Project Engineer, Project Architect, Architect, or Engineer, etc. Do not use other company titles such as “Type I Engineer” where the discipline and role are unidentifiable. (b) SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list indicating by discipline (i.e., architectural, civil, structural, electrical, mechanical, fire protection, interior design, and cost engineering) the number of licensed professionals proposed. Criterion (2). Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members proposed for the design of the repair, alteration, maintenance, structural engineering investigation, preparation of Design-Bid-Build documents and preparation of Design-Build Request for Proposal (NAVFAC 6 Part format) documents of Navy-type shore facilities such as waterfront facilities (piers, wharves and dry-docks), buildings, and structures including underwater inspections and geotechnical investigations in tropical environments similar to Hawaii. NOTE: Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members of the prime A-E will be given more favorable consideration. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: (a) SF330, Part 1, Section F. For the proposed team, provide in Section F a maximum of ten (10) completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered. Professional services of relevant projects submitted must have been completed within the past 10 years. If more than 10 projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first ten projects and disregard any other project information after the first ten projects. Relevant projects shall be civil or multi-disciplinary projects in tropical environments similar to Hawaii, Guam, and Pacific Ocean areas. A “project” is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. Section F, Block 25, item (3) ROLE, shall clearly identify the prime contractor (e.g., ROLE, Electrical – prime contractor). (b) SF330, Part 1, Section E. Each Section E shall include a maximum of five (5) completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. Professional services of projects submitted must have been completed within the past 10 years. Criterion (3). Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry within the past 7 years, in terms of cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. For each relevant project submitted in Section F, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from NECO website) and submit the Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a design build project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. Otherwise provide a Performance Evaluation for other relevant projects not indicated in Section F. The information provided in the SF330 may provide the major portion of the information used in the Governments evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the SF330 and may use other sources to assess past performance information such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Architect Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) and inquiries with previous customers / owners. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. Criterion (4). Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and sub-consultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5). Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide specific examples of a maximum of five (5) projects completed that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Discuss key personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion (6). A-Es quality control program experience. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime ensures quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the teams QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion (7). Firm’s location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Indicate location of office that will be performing the work including sub consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area (e.g., Hawaii, Guam and other tropical areas in the Pacific Ocean). Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for onsite support. Criterion (8). Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense (DoD) shall also be considered, with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DoD A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had DoD contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office was awarded the contract/task order. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications is also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (May 2012). The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications. The submittal/delivery address is Commanding Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Hawaii, (Code OPHA1), 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, JBPHH, HI 96860-3139. Please submit in a sealed envelope/package and mark the bottom right corner SF330 for A-E Solicitation No. N62478-15-R-5024, DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM. This address is for all deliveries, including US Mail, courier service and/or personal delivery services; no other address is acceptable. The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict securities measures are in force; anticipate delays. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Consultants to the prime A-E firm are required to submit only Part II of the SF 330. Two copies of your SF 330 are required: One paper copy and one electronic copy on a CD. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via e-mail therefore, email address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. Firms responding to this announcement by Friday, May 29, 2015, 2:00 p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (HST) will be considered. This is not a request for a proposal.

C--IDIQ Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services for Geotechnical Projects, Various Locations in All Areas under Cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published March 12, 2015  -  Deadline April 14, 2015
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE Request for Proposal (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services are required for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract for Geotechnical Projects, Various Locations in All Areas under Cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific. Services include, but are not limited to design and engineering services for geotechnical investigations including subsurface borings, soil sampling, field tests, geotechnical laboratory testing, analysis, reports and related work. These services will be in support of in-house design or engineering efforts for facilities primarily located in the NAVFAC Pacific area of responsibility (AOR). The services may involve but are not limited to earthwork; pavement; foundations; retaining walls; site characterization; hazardous waste characterization; and solid waste handling and disposal. As part of the site assessment, the required services may include as supporting elements of work environmental investigations, surveys, and audits including monitoring well installation, water and soil sampling, environmental laboratory testing, pavement distress surveys, analysis, reports; post construction award services (PCAS), and related work. The work may include projects in various NAVFAC Pacific locations in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Guam. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractor shall identify and provide for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. Evaluation and selection of the most highly qualified firm will be based on the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate its and each key consultant’s qualifications with respect to the published selection criteria for all services. The following selection criteria 1 thru 7 are list below in descending order of importance: Criterion (1). Professional Qualifications of the prime firm and key personnel (may be from the prime firm and/or subconsultant’s firm) proposed for this contract. The evaluation will consider professional registration, education, relevant experience and longevity with the firm in conducting geotechnical investigations and consulting work relating to earthwork, pavement, and foundation design in support of multi-discipline architect-engineering services that include Military Construction project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Design Charrette, and Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) solicitation documents for projects in Hawaii, Guam, and tropical areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR. Tropical areas are defined as locations lying between the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. The work also includes as supporting elements of work environmental investigations; hazardous waste handling and disposal; and solid waste handling and disposal. For relevant DB RFP projects, familiarity with the NAVFAC 6-part DB RFP will be evaluated more favorably. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: SF330, Part 1, Section E. Key Personnel shall be proposed for but not limited to the following disciplines: geotechnical, civil, structural, environmental, cost, and ocean engineering. Provide the following: (1) list of names of each proposed key personnel to be assigned to this contract. Identify and describe their professional registration or qualifications, role expected to play in this contract, and roles they performed in projects similar to those listed in Selection Criterion 2; and (b) resumes for key personnel are limited to two (2) pages each and shall include project specific info that clearly set forth the role and experience the individual had in performing the contract. Any pages over this limit will not be considered. Complete one Section E for each key personnel, providing all requested information. For Section E, Block 13, specify the proposed role of the key personnel in this Contract; i.e., Principal, Project Manager, or Engineer, etc. Each Section E submission shall include a maximum of five (5) completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered, e.g., multi-discipline architect-engineering support services that may include Military Construction project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Design Charrette, and Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) solicitation documents for projects in Hawaii, Guam, and tropical areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR. Tropical areas are defined as locations lying between the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. Professional services of projects submitted must have been completed within the past 5 years. Limit key personnel to not more than five (5) for the prime firm and not more than three (3) for the subconsultant’s firm. If more key personnel are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first key personnel up to the limits given above and disregard any excess key personnel information. Professional qualifications of prime firm or prime firm’s key personnel will be evaluated more favorably than that of a subconsultant’s. Criterion (2). Specialized Recent Experience within the last 5 years and Technical Competence of the prime firm and key personnel (may be from the prime firm and/or subconsultant’s firm) proposed for this contract in conducting geotechnical investigations and consulting work relating to earthwork, pavement, and foundation design in support of multi-discipline architect-engineering services that include Military Construction project documentation (DD Form 1391), Functional Analysis and Concept Development (FACD), Design Charrette, and Request for Proposal (RFP) Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) solicitation documents for projects in the Hawaii, Guam, and tropical areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR. Tropical areas are defined as locations lying between the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. The work also includes as supporting elements of work environmental investigations; hazardous waste handling and disposal; and solid waste handling and disposal. Specialized recent experience and technical competence of the prime firm or prime firm’s key personnel will be evaluated more favorably than that of a subconsultant’s. Projects located within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR will be evaluated more favorably. For relevant DB RFP projects, familiarity with the NAVFAC 6-part DB RFP will be evaluated more favorably. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: (1) SF330, Part 1, Section F. The A-E should provide a maximum of five (5) completed relevant projects along with a detailed description of A-E support services rendered Professional services of relevant projects submitted must have been completed within the past 5 years. If more than 5 projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. A “project” is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order under an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract. Submission of information on an IDIQ type contract in general terms will not be considered. Experience and technical competence of the prime firm/key personnel will be given more consideration than that of a subconsultant’s. Criterion (3). Past Performance: A-E firms will be evaluated on the projects documented in selection criterion (2) above with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Past performance information not related to the projects described to meet selection criterion (2) will not be considered. The A-E shall provide ACASS performance documentation or similar for each project. If an ACASS performance documentation or similar for each project is not available, provide a Performance Survey (download from the NECO website) and submit the Survey with the SF330). The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. It shall not be from the prime contractor on a project nor shall it be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. If the A-E received any less than satisfactory past performance evaluations from customers/owners, it is incumbent upon the A-E to provide an explanation of the rating and what the A-E has done or will do to preclude less than satisfactory ratings on future contracts. In evaluating past performance, the Government may consider information in the A-E’s SF330 and information gathered from other sources including former customers, Government agencies, federal databases and other references. The info provided by the A-E may provide the major portion of the information used in the Governments evaluation for past performance. The Government, however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources to assess past performance info such as the Past Performance Info Retrieval System (PPIRS), A-E Contract Administration Support System (ACASS), and inquiries with previous customers/owners. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. If an A-E is utilizing past performance information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent /LLC/LTD member companies, the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance info of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The information submitted shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the submitted information will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will perform the contract requirements. The SF330 shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the A-E for future task orders in performance of the contract. A subcontractors or subconsultants past performance will not be given the same level of consideration as either the prime contractor or the joint venture partner because there is no direct legal relationship between the Government and the subcontractor/subconsultant. The Government will consider the past performance and experience of a subcontractor/subconsultant where the prime contractor provides, in its SF330, evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the prime contractor and the subcontractor/subconsultant to enter into a subcontract. However, the level of consideration will depend on the extent to which the A-E demonstrates the prime contractors commitment to award a subcontract to the subcontractor/subconsultant and subcontractors/subconsultants commitment to enter into a subcontract with the prime contractor, including legal accountability for both parties. Prime contractor-subcontractor/subconsultant teams/Joint Ventures/LLCs/LTDs with a demonstrated history of working successfully together on prior projects may be considered more favorably than those without such history. Criterion (4). Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and subconsultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5). Quality Control Program. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Briefly describe how the prime ensures quality consistently across the entire team and how quality of subcontractors work is assured. Briefly describe internal quality assurance procedures and indicate effectiveness. Address the team’s QC processes for checking documents for errors, omissions and quality and incorporating and tracking review comments. Criterion (6). A-E Firm’s Location: A-E firms will be evaluated on the locations of the office or offices from which the A-E firm will perform the work under this contract. Locations within the general geographical area of the work and knowledge of the locality of the work (e.g., Hawaii, Guam, tropical areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR) will be evaluated. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Indicate the location of office that will be performing the work including sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographical area (e.g., Hawaii, Guam, tropical areas within the NAVFAC Pacific AOR). Address ability of the firm to ensure timely response to requests for on site support. Criterion (7). Volume of Work: A-E firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the A-E firm by Department of Defense (DoD) within the past 12 months, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Provide a list of DoD contracts or task orders awarded in the past 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. If the firm performed work as a subcontractor, indicate the contract and/or task order of the prime contractor and the estimated amount completed as the subcontractor. A-E firms with multiple offices shall indicate which branch office completed each project. This procurement is being solicited on a 100% set-aside for small business concerns; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from only small business concerns. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330. The Small Business size standard is $15.0 million average annual receipts over the past three years. Estimated date of contract award is September 2015. Work under this IDIQ contract will be issued by firm-fixed price task orders. The contract term will be a base year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $10,000,000. The options may be exercised within the timeframe specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to the workload and/or satisfactory performance by the A-E under the contract. There will be no synopsis in the event the options included in the contract are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000. Estimated construction cost of project is between $5,000 and $100,000,000. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. The contract will be of the Indefinite Quantity type where the work will be required on an as needed basis during the life of the contract providing the government and contractor agree on the amount. Each project contract will be a firm fixed price A-E Contract. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render the A-E ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website: https://www.sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications is also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (May 2014). For technical SAM help, contact the SAM help desk at www.fsd.gov. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Partnerships (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities: a. A copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement. b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate: (1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing. (2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control. (3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work. (4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents). c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number. The government will put more importance on criteria performed in whole or in part by the prime contractor vice a subcontractor. Submittals that do not include responses addressing ALL elements of the criteria stated above must include an explanation why that element is not addressed. Any other information submitted such as company brochures, leaflets, etc., will not be considered. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Annette Tijerina, annette.tijerina@navy.mil no later than March 30, 2015. Questions submitted after March 30, 2015 may not be addressed due to time constraints. Verbal queries will not be entertained. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the NECO website, https://www.neco.navy.mil/, or Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this presolicitation notice. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. The prime firm and consultants for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: SF330, Part 1, Section H. Include a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria. If necessary, continue on plain bond paper. The SF 330 shall be typed and one-sided (8.5 x 11 inches) pages. Include the following items on the SF330, Part 1, Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. This announcement requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via email, therefore, please include an email address on the SF 330, Part I, Section B8. In accordance with the Brooks Act, the A-E firm must be a registered /licensed architect and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award of this contract and must submit proof (i.e. State registration number, a brief explanation of the A-E firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.) with the SF 330. Failure to submit the required proof may result in an A-E’s elimination from consideration. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. A-E firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330, A-E Qualifications to the office shown below. SF330, Part II, shall be submitted for each firm that will be part of the team proposed and identified in Part I. Submit three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy on a CD of Parts I and II are required. Firms responding to this announcement by 14 April 2015, 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) will be considered. This is not a request for a proposal. (1) For SF330s being sent via United States Postal Services (USPS): Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31:AT) N62742-15-R-0002 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 JBPHH, HI 96860-3134 (2) For SF330s being hand-delivered or Private Courier: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific A-E/Construction Contracts Branch (ACQ31:AT) N62742-15-R-0002 4262 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296

C--Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract for Architect-Engineer Services for Various Mechanical, Fire Protection and Other Projects Under the Cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 4, 2015  -  Deadline June 4, 2015
cpvs

This solicitation is 100% set-aside for small business concerns. The small business size standard classification is NAICS 541330 ($14 M in annual receipts over the past three years). Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for various Design Build and Design Bid-Build mechanical and fire protection projects with associated multi-discipline architect-engineering support services. The services may include, but are not limited to, engineering studies/investigations; Functional Analysis Concept Development (FACD); design charettes; economic analyses; preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimates, and parametric cost estimates; as-built drawings; facility commissioning; facility retro-commissioning; Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED); and post construction services. The majority of the projects will be of the mechanical discipline. Projects may involve new construction, alteration, repair, and installation of mechanical and fire protection facilities and systems. If asbestos or hazardous materials exist, the Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractor shall identify and provide for their disposal in the required documents in accordance with applicable rules and regulations pertaining to such hazardous materials. The selected A-E may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within ten days of the meeting. The contract will be of the Indefinite Quantity type where the work will be required on an as needed basis during the life of the contract providing the government and contractor agree on the amount. Each project contract will be a firm fixed price A-E Contract. The Government will determine the delivery order amount by using rates negotiated and negotiate the effort required to perform the particular project. The contract term will be a base year and four one-year option years. The Government reserves the right to exercise the option years to extend the contract term. There is no dollar limit per year. The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $10,000,000. The Government guarantees a minimum of $10,000. There will be no future synopsis in the event the options included in the contract are exercised. Estimated construction cost of project is between $25,000 and $25,000,000. Estimated date of contract award is November 2015. Proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The following selection evaluation criteria, in order of importance, will be used in the evaluation of A-E firms: Criterion (1) Professional qualifications of firm and staff proposed for the preparation of Design Bid-Build and Design Build Request for Proposal contract documents for mechanical air-conditioning systems and controls, compressed air systems, industrial exhaust and ventilation systems, water heating systems, plumbing systems, water pumping systems, hydraulic systems, elevators/vertical transportation equipment (VTE), gas piping systems, and petroleum/oils/lubricant (POL) systems for facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii, Guam and Pacific Ocean areas; and the design of fire protection systems and controls, fire protection studies and surveys, fire protection investigative reports, fire hazard analysis, life safety code analysis, hydrant flow tests, fire alarm system tests, fire protection/alarm systems for aircraft hangars, warehouses, administrative facilities and other industrial facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Pacific Ocean areas. Criterion (2) Specialized recent experience and technical competence of firm or particular staff members proposed for the preparation of Design Bid-Build and Design Build Request for Proposal contract documents for mechanical air-conditioning systems and controls, compressed air systems, industrial exhaust and ventilation systems, water heating systems, plumbing systems, water pumping systems, hydraulic systems, fire protection systems, elevators/vertical transportation equipment (VTE), gas piping systems, and petroleum/oils/lubricant (POL) systems for facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Pacific Ocean areas; and the design of fire protection systems and controls, fire protection studies and surveys, fire protection investigative reports, fire hazard analysis, life safety code analysis, hydrant flow tests, fire alarm system tests, fire protection/alarm systems for aircraft hangars, warehouses, administrative facilities and other industrial facilities in tropical environments similar to Hawaii and Pacific Ocean areas; in addition fire protection discipline includes design of Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP) measures for facilities and waterways. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: For the proposed team, provide a maximum of ten (10) completed relevant projects along with description of correlated A-E support services rendered. Professional services of relevant projects submitted must have been completed within the past 10 years. Criterion (3) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: For each relevant project submitted, submit a DD2631, Performance Evaluation (Architect Engineer). If a DD2631 is not available, provide a Performance Survey, Attachment 1, and submit the Survey with the SF330. The Performance Survey shall be from the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration, or from the facility owner/user. Criterion (4) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Describe the proposed team’s ability to complete several large and small task orders concurrently requiring quick turnaround. Indicate the firm’s current workload and the availability of the prime and sub-consultants for the specified performance period. Criterion (5) Knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts and principles to facilities and infrastructure problems through an integrated design approach. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Provide specific samples of a maximum of five (5) projects completed that applied sustainability concepts and principles through an integrated design approach. Discuss key personnel experience and qualifications. Criterion (6) A-Es quality control program experience. Criterion (7) Location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project Criterion (8) Volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of Department of Defense A-E contracts among qualified A-E firms and firms that have not had Department of Defense contracts. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT: Provide a list of DoD contracts awarded in the last 12 months. Include dollar amount for each contract/task order awarded. Firms with multiple offices shall indicate which office was awarded the contract/task order. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications is also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (May 2012). The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility siting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. A-E firms meeting the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications. Consultants to the prime A-E firm are required to submit only Part II of the SF 330. Two copies of your SF 330 are required: One paper copy and one electronic copy on a CD. Should there be discrepancies between the paper and electronic submissions, the paper copy shall govern. This solicitation requires all interested firms to have an email address. Notifications will be via email, therefore, email address must be shown on the SF 330, Part 1, Section B8. The submittal/delivery address is Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii, Code OPHA1:RD (N62478-15-R-5023), 400 Marshall Road, Building A-13, JBPHH, HI 96860-3139, This address is for all deliveries, including US Mail, courier service and/or personal delivery services; no other address is acceptable. The delivery address is inside a military installation, therefore, strict securities measures are in force; anticipate delays. Interested firms must allow sufficient time for receipt of submission. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via email to Ms. Rika Delaunay, rika.delaunay@navy.mil. Firms responding to this announcement by Thursday, June 4, 2015 will be considered. Firms must submit forms by 2:00 p.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (HST). This is not a request for a proposal.

C--Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Architect-Engineer Services for Various Electrical Engineering Projects and Related Services at Various Locations in All Areas Under Cognizance of NAVFAC PAC

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published October 17, 2014  -  Deadline November 25, 2014
cpvs

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFCATIONS, IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. This procurement is being solicited on an unrestricted basis. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330. The Small Business size standard is $15.0 million average annual receipts over the past 3 years. Design and Engineering Services are required for an Indefinite Quantity Contract for various electrical projects with associated multi-discipline architect-engineering support services under the cognizance of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific (NAVFAC Pacific). Architect-Engineer (A-E) services may include, but are not limited to, engineering studies; preparation of DD1391 documents; plans, specifications, and cost estimates/parametric cost estimates including preparation of Design-Build Request for Proposal (RFP’s) contract documents or Design Bid Build contract documents; Functional Analysis and Conceptual Design (FACD) development; as built drawings; and post construction services. Projects may involve new construction, alteration, repair, and installation of electrical facilities and systems. All work shall be performed in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local policy, guidance, regulations, and laws including, but not limited to, the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) requirements. NAVFAC Pacific currently uses the following software applications: WINDOWS 7 Workstation, Microsoft Office 2010 Professional (Word 2010, Powerpoint 2010, Excel 2010, Access 2010, Project 2010), Adobe Acrobat CI Pro, and AutoDesk AutoCAD 2010. In accordance with the contract or task order statement of work, the contractor shall complete necessary tasks and submittals or submit various reports to the Government that are readily useable in these applications without further adjustments. Selection will be based on the most highly qualified firm based upon evaluation of the selection criteria stated herein. The A-E must demonstrate their firm’s qualifications (and each individual design team member’s qualifications, where required) with respect to all of the published selection criteria. Selection criteria 1 through 9 are listed below in descending order of importance. Specific selection criteria include: 1. Firm’s Specialized Experience: Firm’s recent specialized experience in the design of electrical exterior primary distribution, substations, power generation, secondary distribution, waterfront electrical systems, telecommunications systems and facilities in tropical environments similar to the Pacific Ocean areas, and preparation of design-build and design-bid-build contract documents similar in size, complexity, and dollar value (approximately $10 - $25 million or more in construction value per project/contract). List a maximum of eight (8) relevant projects completed in the past ten (10) years which best describe recent specialized experience in the specified design and engineering services discussed above. Each project shall include: Point of contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance and contract award amount. A project or contract is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. If more than eight (8) projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first eight projects and disregard any other project information after the first eight projects. 2. Key Personnel’s Professional Qualifications, and Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Key personnel are identified as the Principal/Program Manager and Project Managers in the following disciplines: Electrical, Architectural, Structural, Civil, Mechanical, and Geotechnical. Limit submission to not more than ten (10) key personnel including the Principal/Program Manager, the Project Managers for each of the six major disciplines described above, and three other key personnel deemed by the firm to be most important to the success of the team. For all 10 key personnel, explain the scope of responsibilities in the proposed organization and how the firms organizational construct is most appropriate considering effectiveness and cost factors. a. Professional Qualifications: Active U.S. professional registration. b. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Past experience in the specified design and engineering services described in Selection Criteria 1. Provide a maximum of five (5) relevant projects for each key person. A project or contract is defined as either a stand-alone contract or a single task order in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract having the features described above. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation for each key person, the Government will evaluate the first five projects for each person and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. Each project shall include: Point of contact name, e-mail address, phone number, contract number or project identification number, contract period of performance, contract award amount, and the role and experience the individual had in performing the project. If a project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the individual or if a project does not provide the requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers, that project will be evaluated less favorably. 3. Past Performance: Firms will be evaluated on past performance with respect to work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and cooperation and responsiveness. Firms should include any letters of commendation or awards. Firms will also be evaluated on past performance information obtained from a federal-wide database called the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). Past performance of the Prime Firm will be given more consideration than that of the subconsultants. 4. Capacity to perform the work in the required time and ability to accomplish multiple projects concurrently. 5. Sustainable Design: Firms will be evaluated in terms of their knowledge and demonstrated experience in applying sustainability concepts through an integrated design approach and designing in accordance with the U.S. Green Building Council, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or equivalent. Provide a maximum of five (5) projects that have attained or been submitted for LEED certification. For projects not yet certified, identify the date the project was submitted. For all projects, identify the teams major contribution(s), design elements/features/equipment/etc., in attainment of the certification. If more than five projects are submitted for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first five projects and disregard any other project information after the first five projects. LEED certified projects will be considered more favorably than projects not yet certified. 6. Design Quality Control Program (DQCP): Firms will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal design quality control program used to ensure technical accuracy of drawings, specifications, cost estimates and other required technical data. Describe the design quality control organization structure and list the responsible key personnel. Discuss the methodology that will be used to eliminate errors, omissions, interferences, and inconsistencies between all design disciplines and consultants; inconsistencies between drawings, specifications, and cost estimates; and for the incorporation of the latest criteria, lessons learned and review comments. 7. Small Business Utilization. Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which their submissions demonstrate the identification and utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZone), Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on two sub-criteria; Sub-criteria A - Past performance in utilization of small business concerns. Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which small businesses were utilized, and that assigned small business goals were achieved on previous contracts and/or on the extent that small businesses were utilized on projects in which no goals were assigned. Firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI. Large Business offerors shall submit three (3) final or most recent Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size. If ISRs are not final or most recent, they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals on the submitted ISRs were not met, provide an explanation for each missed goal. If ISRs were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, submit other documentation which demonstrates utilization of the various small business category firms for the contracts. If small businesses were not utilized, provide a detailed explanation. A sample template for subcontracting history for newly established large businesses or large businesses with no prior ISR history is provided as Attachment 1. Small business offerors shall submit documentation which shows utilization of the various small business category firms for similar contracts of relative size. Note that small business offerors can and should include self-performed work for this sub-criteria. Small business offerors are also encouraged to utilize the sample template included as Attachment 1 to provide the required small business past performance information. Sub-criteria B - Utilization and participation of small business concerns for this contract. All offerors shall provide information regarding the participation of small business concerns in this contract. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of total proposed price, the extent of work to be performed as the prime contractor and the planned usage of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Identify each subconsultant by name, discipline and size status. Utilize $20,000,000 as the total proposed price. The following FY 2015 NAVFAC goals are provided in terms of total planned subcontracting value for utilization of small business. SB: 66.80%, HUBZone: 8.94%, SDB: 17.27%, WOSB: 15.30%, and SDVOSB: 3.03%. Demonstrate how you plan to meet these goals. Large and Small Businesses that are slated shall: i) Large Business offerors will be required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan including goals proposed for each small business category and all other program requirements per FAR 52.219-9 prior to the interview. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan template, Attachment 2, shall be used to complete the subcontracting plan submission. Firms shall submit their Small Business Subcontracting Plan utilizing this template, and only this template. ii) Small Business offerors shall submit a Small Business Participation Plan, using the template at Attachment 3. Small businesses can and should include planned self-performed work in Attachment 3. Small business offerors are not to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, but shall utilize the template included as Attachment 3 to submit the required subcontracting participation information. 8. Firms location in the general geographical area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project; provided, that application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract. 9. Volume of Work: Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense (DoD) within the past 12 months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DoD A and E contracts among qualified A and E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts. Include the following items in Section H, Block 30 of the SF 330: (1) a summary of qualifications in narrative discussion addressing each of the above selection evaluation criteria, (2) an organization chart of the proposed team showing the names and roles of all key personnel listed in Section E with the associated firm as listed in Section C, (3) your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers, and (4) evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. The planned contract type is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract where work will be ordered via task orders on an as-needed basis during the life of the contract provided the Government and the contractor agree on the amount. Each task order will be a firm fixed price A-E contract. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of initial contract award with four (4) additional one-year option periods. The total amount that may be paid under this contract (including option years) will not exceed $20,000,000 for the entire contract term. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to workload and/or satisfaction of the A-E performance under the subject contract. There will be no synopsis in the event the options are exercised. The minimum guarantee for the entire contract term (including option years) is $10,000.00. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. No other general notification to firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Estimated award timeframe is July 2015. This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis. All contractors are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website at http://sam.gov. Completion of electronic annual representations and certifications are also mandatory prior to award of a contract. Refer to FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (May 2012). Joint Ventures (JV), Limited Liability Companies (LLC), and Limited Partnerships (LTD) shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities: a. A copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement. b. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate: (1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing. (2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control. (3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work. (4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents). c. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE numbers, address, point of contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number. The selected A-E firm may be required to participate in a pre-fee meeting within seven days of notification and provide a fee proposal within twenty days of the meeting. The contract will require that the selected A-E firm have e-mail and Internet on-line access for routine exchange of correspondence. Fee proposals may be subject to an advisory audit performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. The selected firm, its subsidiaries or affiliates that design or prepare specifications for a construction contract cannot provide the construction services for the same contract. This includes concept design, which includes preparation of project programming documents (DD1391), facility sitting studies, environmental assessments, or other activities that result in identification of project scope and cost. A-E firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications. Submit two (2) paper copies and one CD electronic copy of Parts I and II. Notifications will be sent via email; therefore, please include an email address in Block 8 of the SF 330. Responses are due to later than 2:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time (HST) on November 25, 2014. The delivery addresses for SF 330s are as follows: (1) For SF 330s being sent via United States Postal Services (USPS): Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific Code ACQ31:DM (N62742-15-R-0001) 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 JBPHH, HI 96860-3134 (2) For SF 330s being sent via courier service or hand-delivered: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific Code ACQ31:DM (N62742-15-R-0001) 4262 Radford Drive, Building 62 Honolulu, HI 96818-3296 Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Electronic (e-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. All questions should be submitted in writing and forwarded via e-mail to Ms. Donna Matsuura, donna.matsuura@navy.mil no later than November 12, 2014. Questions submitted after November 12, 2014 may not be addressed due to time constraints. All potential offerors are advised to check daily the Federal Business Opportunities website, https://www.fbo.gov/, for any additional modifications pertaining to this presolicitation notice. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS.

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE, WITH EMPHASIS IN THE PACIFIC AND INDIAN OCEAN AREAS

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published July 20, 2016
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR STRUCTURAL PROJECTS AND OTHER PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published December 28, 2015  -  Deadline May 19, 2015
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--IDIQ ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR TOPOGRAPHIC, HYDROGRAPHIC, CADASTRAL, AND PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS, VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN ALL AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF NAVFAC PACIFIC

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published April 12, 2015
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECTS AND RELATED SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN ALL AREAS UNDER COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published April 28, 2016  -  Deadline June 1, 2016
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECT ENGINEER SERVICES FOR VARIOUS CIVIL ENGINEERING PROJECTS AND RELATED SERVICES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN ALL AREAS UNDER COGNIZANCE OF NAVAL FACILITIES

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 13, 2015  -  Deadline March 18, 2015
cpvs

No Description Provided

C--IDIQ Contract for A-E Services for Design, Engineering, Electrical Engineering Projects and Related Services, Various Locations, NAVFAC Hawaii Areas

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published February 4, 2016  -  Deadline March 8, 2016
cpvs

Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract to include design and engineering services for electrical project at various locations under the cognizance of NAVFAC Hawaii. Services include, but are not limited to, design and engineering services for various Design-Build (DB) and Design-Bid-Build (DBB) electrical engineering projects with associated multi-discipline architect-engineering support services. The services shall also include engineering studies; investigations; Functional Analysis and Conceptual Development (FACD); design charettes; economic analysis; preparation of DD1391 documents; plans; specifications; cost estimates/parametric cost estimates; Request for Proposal (RFP); as-built drawings; hazardous material survey; acceptance testing of critical systems; and post construction award services(PCAS). Projects may involve new construction, alteration, repair, and installation of electrical facilities, infrastructure and systems.
  • 1