Public tenders for architect, architecture in Department-of-veterans-affairs-va-medical-center-gainesville-florida United States

Find all Architecture tenders in the world.
Finding business opportunities has never been easier.

Results for architecture. Make a new search!
ArchitectureUnited Statesdepartment-of-veterans-affairs-va-medical-center-gainesville-florida

Capability and Requirement Management Support(CARMS) and Information Management Business Architecture Support(IM BAS) 3 months bridge Extension

Other Defense Agencies, Defense Health Agency | Published May 31, 2016
cpvs

This bridge award provides for Requirements Management Support and Business Architecture support for the IM Office to include support for: requirements development and management processes; Military Health System (MHS) IM/IT investment and sustainment portfolio capabilities activities; functional requirements submissions; development and management of MHS IM/IT functional requirements; Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) process and documentation; Post Implementation Reviews; and requirements reviews during IT lifecycle acquisition phases. In addition, support will include Architecture and Standards Development and Management Support for the Information Management (IM) Office to include support for: architecture strategies & guidelines; operational and data architecture products; architectural and standards analysis; architectural & standards committees and workgroups; Federal and External partner architectural analysis and alignment; health information standards; data management; and modeling and simulation. The listed support will also be provided to various efforts under the Functional Champion (FC) Office. See attached J&A for more information

Architect-Engineering Services

Department of Justice, Federal Prison Industries/UNICOR | Published April 29, 2015
cpvs

Three IDIQ contracts awarded: 1. Miller-Remick LLC Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 Contract DJU4600004624 2. Penza Bailey Architects Baltimore, MD 21212 Contract DJU4600004625 3. Bell Architects, PC Washington, DC 20001 Contract DJU4600004626 Guaranteed Minimum: $500.00 each Not-To-Exceed Maximum: $ 2,500,000.00 each Base year plus 4 option years.

C--IDIQ CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL TYPE FACILITIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AOR, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published November 28, 2017  -  Deadline January 19, 2018
cpvs

N62470-18-R-4000 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR INDUSTRIAL TYPE FACILITIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE. Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM SF-330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Attachments:(a) Past Performance Questionnaire (b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (c) Visitor Access Pass Request (d) LRA Commercial Vehicle Inspection Procedures This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for projects that are Industrial Type Facilities located throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Area of Responsibility (AOR), Worldwide. Projects will be primarily in the AOR of NAVFAC EURAFSWA (Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia); however, contract task orders may be placed for work for any DoD Activity. Refer to the attached document for further information.

C--IDIQ contract for multi-discipline architect and engineering services in support of projects at military installations throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic North AOR

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 10, 2016
cpvs

North region A and E services, IDIQ contract for multi-discipline architect and engineering services in support of projects at military installations throughout the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic North AOR.

Enterprise Architecture Branch Support Services

Other Defense Agencies, Defense Health Agency | Published December 7, 2015
cpvs

See attached J&A.

C--ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES REPLACE DAMAGED ROOFS AT THE CAMPUS AND TUCKPOINT RE-AWARDED TO TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR, ATLANTA, GA

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA North Florida/South Georgia Health Care System | Published October 14, 2015
cpvs

No Description Provided

Governance, Requirements, and Architecture Management Support (GRAMS)

Other Defense Agencies, Defense Health Agency | Published September 17, 2015
cpvs

This award provides for Program Management Support for the DHA Requirement Managers for GRAMS, shall be required for, but is not limited to: Requirements development and management processes; Military Health System (MHS) IM/IT investment and sustainment portfolio capabilities activities; Functional requirements submissions and management; Development and management of MHS IM/IT functional requirements; Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) process and documentation; Post Implementation Reviews; Requirements reviews during IT lifecycle acquisition phases; Business Process strategies and guidelines; Business Process and data management products; Business Process and standards analysis; Business Process Improvement; Federal and External partner architectural analysis and alignment; Health Information Technology (HIT) standards; Health Data management; Modeling and simulation; and Requirements Tools.

Pre-solicitation Synopsis- Governance, Requirements, and Architecture Management Support (GRAMS)

Other Defense Agencies, Defense Health Agency | Published January 23, 2015
cpvs

The Defense Health Agency - Requirement Management Office (DHA-RMO) has a requirement to obtain contract support services to assist the DHA and the Military Health System in the following program management support areas: • Requirements development and management processes; • Military Health System (MHS) IM/IT investment and sustainment portfolio capabilities activities; • Functional requirements submissions and management; • Development and management of MHS IM/IT functional requirements; • Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) process and documentation; • Post Implementation Reviews; • Requirements reviews during IT lifecycle acquisition phases; • Business Process strategies and guidelines; • Business Process and data management products; • Business Process and standards analysis; • Business Process Improvement; • Federal and External partner architectural analysis and alignment; • Health Information Technology (HIT) standards; • Health Data management; • Modeling and simulation; and • Requirements Tools See attachment 1 for more information.

C--INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published May 25, 2016  -  Deadline June 6, 2016
cpvs

N62470-16-R-6000 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR MEDICAL PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY, WORLDWIDE. Description: ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM SF 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. Attachments: (a) Past Performance Questionnaire (b) Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template This procurement will result in one Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for multi-discipline Architect-Engineer (AE) services for medical design projects located throughout the Naval Facility Engineering Command Area of Responsibility, Worldwide, and will be procured in accordance with the Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute (formerly known as the Brooks Act), 40 USC Section 1101 et seq., as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The IDIQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $50,000,000. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. The options may be exercised within the time frame specified in the resultant contract at the sole discretion of the Government subject to work load and/or satisfaction of the AE performance under the subject contract. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year up to a maximum of $50,000,000 for the entire contract term. Estimated start date is December 2016. This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis; therefore, replies to this notice are requested from all business concerns. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541310, (Architectural Services). The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications, in accordance with the evaluation criteria. A sources sought for N62470-16-R-6000 for Medical Designs, predominantly for Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM) projects, was published on 3 December 2015 seeking responses from small businesses. Four responses were received from small business firms. After a technical evaluation of their qualifications, none of firms were determined to have the necessary qualifications and capabilities to perform the requirements of the contract based on the criteria established in the notice. The types of design projects expected to be performed under this contract are for 500 series facilities as defined by UFC 2-000-05N (hospitals, dental clinics, medical clinics, veterinary clinics, laboratories, etc.) and will be predominantly for Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM) projects, but may include MILCON projects and medical studies. Projects will be designed in accordance with criteria prescribed in the latest version of UFC 4-510-01 (Military Medical Facilities) and under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA). Architect-Engineering and Engineering Services that may be required under this contract include DD Form 1391 documentation, Design-Build RFPs, Design-Bid-Build plans (AutoCAD and BIM) and specifications (SPECSINTACT), cost estimates, related studies, field investigations, surveying and mapping, tests, evaluations, consultations, program management, soil borings, hazardous materials identification, energy computation, life safety code studies, interior space comprehensive planning/design, conceptual designs, medical studies (e.g., Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, Concept of Operations), value engineering, other associated engineering services, shop drawing review, as-built drawing preparation, Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI), Commissioning, construction inspection and engineering consultation services during construction, and other related services. The services of a qualified medical planner and a medical equipment planner are required. SELECTION INTERVIEW: Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired. All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM Website: https://www.sam.gov. In accordance with the FAR 36.601-4(b) the AE firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm to be eligible for award. Provide proof that firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering, (i.e., state registration number or a brief explanation of the firm’s licensing in states that do not register firms, etc.). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration. FIRMS WHO ARE OFFERING AS A JOINT VENTURE SHOULD INCLUDE WITH THEIR SUBMISSION A COPY OF THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. FAILURE TO INCLUDE THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT WILL RESULT IN THE FIRM’S ELIMINATION FROM FURTHER EVALUATION. The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest, including NFAS 5252.209-9300, Organizational Conflicts of Interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms desiring to be considered for this contract must submit a completed SF-330 package. If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 by 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include the ISRs, certificates, PPQs, licenses, or the draft subcontracting plan, as required by the Small Business Subcontracting criterion, nor does the page limit include cover sheets or divider sheets, provided that these do not include any information regarding the capability of the company, or any information submitted in response to a question or requirement from the synopsis. If a cover sheet or divider sheet includes any information determined by the Contracting Officer to be substantially answering a question or requirement in the synopsis or explaining company capability, it will be counted as a page toward the 75 page limit). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your DUNS, CAGE, and TIN numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. The organizational chart may be one page single sided 11 by 17 foldout, using 11 pitch/point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions or tables). Interested firms shall submit (5) hard copies of the SF-330 and (5) CDs/DVDs to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race, 6506 Hampton Blvd, Norfolk VA 23508. If there are any discrepancies between the hard copy and CD, the hard copy will govern. Responses are due no later than June 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM EDT. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The point of contact is Heather Race, Contract Specialist, at 757-322-8103. NOTE: If hand-carrying or express mailing proposal, the firm is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly. Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified. All visitors to NAVFAC Atlantic who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass and ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: RAPIDGATE badges must be programmed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA. Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Excel spreadsheet). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the security department via email: 1. Iris Gholston, 757-322-8116, iris.gholston@navy.mil Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the security department at least five working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check. Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA. Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA. Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA: Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized. Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to heather.race@navy.mil. SELECTION CRITERIA: Standard Form 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly-qualified firm based on criterion responses. Failure to provide requested data or to comply with the instructions in this notice could result in a firm being considered less qualified or eliminated from consideration. The Selection of Architects and Engineers Statute and FAR Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. The AE must demonstrate the team’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria. Failure to provide complete submission information defined in the evaluation factors below may affect a firm’s qualification ratings. Evaluation criteria 1 through 3 are considered most important and are equal among themselves; criteria 4 through 6 are of slightly less importance and are equal among themselves; criterion 7 is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation criteria include: 1. Specialized Experience 2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence 3. Past Performance 4. Quality Control 5. Program Management, Capacity and Location 6. Commitment to Small Business 7. Volume of Work Criterion 1 —Specialized Experience (SF330, Part I, Section F): Firms will be evaluated on relevant specialized experience and technical competence in performance of services similar to those anticipated under this contract through evaluation of experience in: 1. Experience with regard to medical treatment facilities design and construction. 2. Experience with multi-phased design and construction of renovations of existing facilities performed within an operational medical facility that had to comply with infection control, life safety and Interim Life Safety Measures in compliance with The Joint Commission (TJC), and had to address noise/vibration control issues 3. Experience with medical facilities studies 4. Experience applying sustainability concepts to design and construction through an integrated, cost effective design approach in accordance with federally recognized sustainability ratings systems such as the U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System or Green Globes. Firms may be considered more favorably by demonstrating the following: 1. Experience with medical facilities in multiple NAVFAC geographic regions. Submission requirements: Provide two (2) relevant medical studies (e.g., Health Care Requirements Analysis, Deficiency Tabulations, Facility Utilization Studies, Economical Analysis, Project Books, Concept of Operations) completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this Notice. Additionally, provide a maximum five (5) relevant design projects in which the design was completed within the past seven (7) years immediately preceding the date of issuance of this notice that best demonstrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the areas outlined above. Within the maximum five (5) submitted relevant design projects, provide a minimum of: • Two (2) projects that are phased medical renovation designs with construction cost between $1M to $50M.; and • Two (2) medical design projects with construction cost over $30M. If the project submitted is a Design-Bid-Build (full design), to be relevant, the design must be complete. If the project is Design-Build (DB), to be relevant, the DB design documents must be complete. If the project is a DB RFP development, to be relevant, the DB RFP must be complete. Sufficient information for each submitted project must include: • Date of completion of the project must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. • Project building(s) size (SF or SM.) • Identify implementation of sustainable concepts employed, or sustainable certification achieved, such as (but not limited) to Green Globes or LEED. For projects certified, submit a copy of the certificate (certificates are not included toward the overall page count). If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements. All projects provided in the SF330 must be completed by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from consideration in the evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part 1, Section F, block 25, “Firm Name” Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). In block 24, include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience as outlined above. If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the value of the work that firm provided towards the performance of the overall project. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the firm/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the firm/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the firm/team member proposed for this contract and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration. NOTE: If the firm is a joint venture, projects performed by the joint venture should be submitted; however, if there are no projects performed by the joint venture, projects may be submitted for either joint venture partner, not to exceed a total of five (5) total design projects in the submission package. At least one (1) relevant project must be submitted from each joint venture partner if no projects were performed by the joint venture. Firms failing to provide projects from all joint venture partners will be considered to have not met the requirements of the criterion. Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part I, Section F and shall be completed projects. Projects not completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract award. Do not submit an IDIQ contract as an example project. Instead, list relevant task orders or stand-alone contract awards that fit within the definition above. The Government will not evaluate information provided for an IDIQ contract. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers may result in a firm being considered less qualified. All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in the SF330, Part I, Section F. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to Part 1, Section F in evaluation of Criterion 1. Criterion 2—Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF330, Part I, Sections E and G): Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Failure to provide a balanced workforce in the disciplines required to satisfy the requirements of the scope listed above will result in the firm being considered not qualified. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are Program Manager, Medical Planner, Medical Equipment Planner, Quality Control, Project Manager, Architect, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, Geotechnical Engineer; a licensed Fire Protection Engineer is required; a practicing certified interior designer; cost estimator and scheduler are also required. Submission Requirements: SF330, Part I, Section E. Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate experience in the work proposed under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each and should indicate: professional registration (including registration / certification number), certification, licensure and/or accreditation in appropriate disciplines; cite recent experience within the past seven (7) years on project-specific work relevant to the services required under this contract; and indicate proposed role in this contract. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF330, Part 1, Section G. Differentiate between planning and design experience. Include any sustainable professional accreditation, such as (but not limited to) LEED AP, Green Globes Professional. Criterion 3—Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. Evaluating past performance and experience will include information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) or CPARS/ACASS for Criterion 1 projects and may include customer inquiries, Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. NOTE: Past performance information for projects listed under Criterion 1 may be given greater weight. Submission Requirements: SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION FOR EACH PROJECT UNDER CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (A)) included in this notice is provided for the firm or its team members to submit to the client for each project the firm includes under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. A FIRM SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS/ACASS IS AVAILABLE. IF A CPARS/ACASS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF330. If the firm is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, firms should complete and submit with their responses the first page of the PPQ (Attachment (A)), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms may submit a PPQ previously submitted under a different Notice/RFP (legible copies are acceptable) as long as it is on the same form as posted with this Synopsis. Firms should follow up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If requested by the client, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Governments point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic Code ACQ34, Attn: Heather Race via email at heather.race@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues. Information shall not exceed two double-sided pages (or four single-sided pages) in total. Awards, letters of commendation, certificates of appreciation, etc. shall not be submitted and will not be considered in the evaluation. Criterion 4—Quality Control Program (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on the strength of the quality control program proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors. Submission Requirements: Describe the quality control program that will be utilized for all deliverables of this contract and the management approach for quality control processes and procedures. The description shall: 1. Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one of the projects submitted as part of SF330, Section F or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously. Additionally, discuss any lessons learned that have led to the proposed plan. 2. Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and team components. 3. Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract, specifically, technical accuracy of and assurance of overall coordination of plans and specifications, and engineering and design services. 4. Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles, responsibilities and authorities assigned to the individual(s). 5. Describe how the firm’s quality control program extends to management of subcontractors. Criterion 5—Program Management and Capacity and Location (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated on the firm’s ability to plan for and manage work under the contract, the capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and on the locations of their office(s) that will be performing the work under this contract. Submission Requirements: 1. Provide an organizational chart for the team and discuss the management plan for this contract and personnel roles in the organization. Describe the ability of the firm to manage, coordinate and work effectively with team members, both internal staff and consultants. Discuss the history of working relationships with team members, including joint venture partners where applicable. Teams with a demonstrated history of working together may be considered more favorably 2. Describe the firm’s present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period. Describe the workload/availability of the key personnel during the anticipated contract performance period and the ability of the firm to provide qualified backup staffing for key personnel to ensure continuity of services. General statements of availability/capacity may be considered less favorably. 3. Provide the location of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices, and offices of team members and how these locations will be advantageous to the government. Due to the worldwide coverage of this contract, office in multiple locations may be considered advantageous. Criterion 6—Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms will be evaluated in terms of their extent to identify and commit to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement. In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Businesses shall submit three “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of relative size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports were not applicable to the similar contracts noted, large businesses shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts. Small Businesses shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size. In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals for FY2015 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals: FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 SB 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% 65.00% HubZone 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% SDB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% WOSB 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% 15.00% SDVOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% VOSB 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with FAR 19.7 and DFAR 219.7, will be required and incorporated into the contract award. A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses; however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract. The Small Business size standard classification is NAICS 541310, Architectural and Engineering Services, size standard $7,500,000. The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template (Attachment (B)) shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template. Criterion 7—Volume of Work (SF330, Part 1, Section H) Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DOD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidance and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD within the past twelve months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified AE firms including small, disadvantaged business firms, and firms that have not had prior DOD AE contracts. Submission Requirements: Firms do not submit data for this factor. The government will obtain information as described above. For joint venture (JV) submissions, the government will obtain the data for each JV partner.

T--Request for SF 330s, Restricted for A-E IDIQ Contracts for A-E Photogrammetric Mapping and Aerial Photography

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published September 2, 2015
cpvs

Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract (IDIQ) for Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services for Photgrammetric and LiDAR Surveying and Mapping for CONUS&OCONUS

T--Request for SF 330s; Unrestricted for Architect-Engineer IDIQ Contracts for A-E Photogrammetric and LiDAR Surveying and Mapping

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published February 25, 2015  -  Deadline March 27, 2015
cpvs

I. CONTRACT INFORMATION: These contracts are being procured in accordance with the Brooks A-E Act as implemented in FAR Subpart 36.6 and supplements thereto. Services of a qualified firm are sought to provide Photogrammetric and LiDAR Surveying and Mapping. Firms will be selected for negotiation based on demonstrated competence and qualifications to accomplish the required work. The firm's team must have a Certified Photogrammetrist or a Professional Licensed Surveyor. The Government intends to negotiate and award six indefinite delivery contracts within one year after the required response date to this solicitation, but reserves the right to award up to four additional indefinite delivery contracts (up to a total of ten contracts) in the event there are insufficient awards under the restricted solicitation. Those most highly qualified small businesses that do not receive an award under the restricted solicitation will have their SF 330s automatically added to this unrestricted solicitation SF 330 responses. This solicitation does not supersede contracts previously awarded for similar work by other Corps Districts. However, a contractor awarded a contract under the restricted announcement will be ineligible for award under this announcement. Each contract will be for five years. The amount of work in each contract will not exceed $12,500,000.00 ($12.5 Million) and the guaranteed minimum will be $10,000.00. Rates will be negotiated for each 12-month period of the contract at the time of the original award. On each individual contract, the first year's rate schedule shall become effective the day of contract award, and shall be in effect for one year from contract award. Subsequent rate schedules shall become effective on the yearly anniversary dates from contract award. Work will be issued by firm fixed price task orders not to exceed the contract amount and will be subject to successful negotiations. The District may award IDIQ contracts in the future or borrow capacity from other federal contracts to perform work that may also be encompassed by this announcement. The Contracting Officer will consider the following and other relevant factors in deciding which Contractor will be selected to negotiate an order: performance and quality of deliverables under the current contract, current capacity to accomplish the task order in the required time, and uniquely specialized experience. The contracts will be for requirements within the Continental United States and outside the Continental United States (CONUS and OCONUS). This announcement is open to all businesses regardless of size. All interested A-E firms are reminded that in accordance with the provisions of PL 95-507, they will be expected to place subcontracts to the maximum practicable extent consistent with the efficient performance of the contract with small and small disadvantaged firms. Selected firms will be required to comply with FAR 52.219-9 regarding the requirement for a subcontracting plan on that part of the work it intends to subcontract. The subcontracting goals for this contract, which are subject to change, currently are that (1) a minimum of 40.0% of the Contractor's intended subcontract amount be placed with small businesses (SB), including (2) small disadvantaged businesses (SDB), 3.0%; (3) woman-owned small businesses (WOSB), 7%; (4) HUBZone small business, 1.0%; (5) service-disabled veteran-owned small business, 3.0% and veteran owned small business, 2.0%. A subcontracting plan is not required with this submittal. The wages and benefits of service employees (see FAR 22.10) performing under these contracts must be at least equal to those determined by the Department of Labor under the Service Contract Act, relative to the employee's home office location. To be eligible for a contract award, a firm must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov. Registration is not required with this submission. II. PROJECT INFORMATION: Work will consist of performing and/or producing aerial photogrammetric and LiDAR surveys, ground control, analytical aero-triangulation, geo-rectification, ortho-rectification, pan-sharpening, tiling, mosaicing, digital elevation model/digital terrain model(DEM/DTM) data, collection and manipulation of photogrammetric mapping, aerial photography, GIS mapping, remote sensing, large and small-scale topographic maps, planimetrics compilation and contouring , geo-database development, maintenance and support and landuse/landcover analysis and mapping, satellite imagery, and other geospatial processes for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other federal agencies such as, but not limited to: U.S. Army CE, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Defense, Department of the Interior, NOAA, DOT, state, local, and tribal agencies etc. Services will be for areas within the CONUS and OCONUS. The potential exists that some task orders will include data classified up to SECRET; therefore, to be eligible for those task orders requiring a SECRET clearance, the Contractor shall possess a SECRET clearance for facilities, equipment, and personnel involved in the required services. A SECRET CLEARANCE IS NOT REQUIRED WITH THIS SUBMISSION. III. SELECTION CRITERIA: Criteria a through d are primary. Criteria e and f are secondary and will only be used as tie-breakers among firms that are essentially technically equal. The selection criteria are listed below in descending order of importance (first by major criterion and then by each sub-criterion). a. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: (1) current experience in collection of aerial imagery for large & small scale photogrammetric mapping utilizing analog and digital aerial cameras (sweep or frame system), analytical and softcopy aerotriangulation and softcopy feature compilation and extraction; (2) current experience in the collection and processing of LIDAR data into various mapping products to include elevation models, surface models, and contours for large and small scale mapping projects; (3) current experience in digital orthophoto generation for large and small scale mapping projects; (4) current experience in large and small scale photogrammetric production in support of (engineering design, facilities management, regional planning, and real property inventory); (5) ability to integrate digital terrain data from multiple sources into a surface model; (6) ground survey control planning and acquisition for photogrammetric map compilation including conventional (total stations, EDM systems and levels) measuring systems and Global Positioning Systems; (7) capability to provide GIS mapping products and analysis of GIS data sets; (8) ability to perform GIS boundary mapping from real estate tract maps, deeds, and real property transactional registers (9) facilities and capability to gather historical photos from hardcopy and/or digital sources and perform photo image analysis and interpretation to detect landuse and change analysis utilizing digital softcopy techniques and manually via hardcopy; (10) capability and experience in providing geospatial data products in Spatial Data Standards for facilities, infrastructure, and environment (SDSFIE) (latest version); (11) ability to conduct supervised and unsupervised digital classifications from remotely sensed (i.e. hyperspectral and multispectral data sets, high resolution sensor data sets) data and incorporate results into existing geospatial data bases and/or thematic maps; (12) ability to deliver digital data that is readable and fully operational with AutoCAD (current version), ArcGIS (current version), ERDAS Imagine, and Bentley Microstation formats without any additional manipulation. b. Professional Qualifications: The firm must have a Certified Photogrammetrist or a Professional Licensed Surveyor as well as personnel with demonstrated expertise in all aspects of photogrammetry and remote sensing, a qualified management team, quality control staff and technical staff. The evaluation will consider education, training, registration, voluntary certifications (e.g., ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist), overall and relevant experience, and longevity with the firm. c. Capacity to Accomplish the Work: (1) firms must have the capability to perform approximately $4,000,000 of the required type work in a one-year period. The evaluation of a firms capability will consider the availability of an adequate number of personnel in key disciplines (management, quality control, and technical); (2) capability of firm to furnish photogrammetric equipment including owned or leased airworthy aircraft, large and medium format digital cameras (sweep or frame system), LIDAR sensor suitable for elevation data collection to support production of ASPRS Class 1 standards for 2 foot or better contours, currently certified precision aerial mapping camera, hardware and software to perform fully analytical and softcopy aerotriangulation, analytical and softcopy stereoplotter instrumentation for digital data collection of planimetric and topographic features, DTM, DEM data collection and manipulation of terrain data (to include DTED data sets), digital data editing facilities, airborne GPS and IMU capabilities for aircraft navigation and photo/sensor control; (3) ability to provide necessary survey equipment (GPS and conventional) and personnel to accomplish airborne global positioning system (ABGPS) controlled photogrammetry missions in a timely schedule; (4) demonstrate project management skills, tools and past experience monitoring multiple task orders simultaneously; (5) demonstrated quality control procedures and tools to insure quality photogrammetric mapping products; (6) demonstrate ability to acquire SECRET security clearances for personnel, facilities and equipment involved in the analysis, interpretation, cartographic, digitizing, and photographic reproduction of photogrammetric services required for each project. d. Past Performance: Past performance on Department of Defense and other contracts with respect to cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules, as determined from ACASS/CPARS/PPIRS data, credible documentation included in the SF 330 and other sources. e. SB and SDB Participation: Extent of participation of SB, SDB, woman-owned businesses, HUB Zone and Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses will be measured as a percentage of the estimated effort. f. Equitable Distribution of DOD Contracts: Evaluation will consider the Volume of DOD, A-E contract awards in the last 12 months. The objective is to achieve an equitable distribution of DOD, A-E contracts among qualified firms, by giving more consideration to firms with lower total volume. IV. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Interested firms having the capabilities to perform this work must submit five (5) printed copies of their SF330, each containing Parts I and II of the SF330 information for the prime firm and Part II for all subcontractors/consultants to the address listed below, along with an electronic copy (on CD-ROM) not later than 3:00 p.m. local time on March 27, 2015. E-mails are not acceptable. Each copy shall be divided by tabs (dividers) separating Parts I and II, and tabs dividing the subsequent sections from each other (Note: Parts I, II, and Subsequent Sections are as defined in the SF330 Instructions). Include the firm's CAGE code on the SF330, Part 1, Section B. On the SF330, Part 1, Section C, provide the CAGE code for each subcontractor or consultant, if available. In SF 330, Part I, Section D, include an organization chart of the key personnel to be assigned to the project and a narrative describing how the organization will function, including how the QA/QC plan will be implemented. Those functions to be subcontracted out shall be clearly identified. In SF 330, Part I, indicate in Section C-11 or Section H if the prime contractor has worked with the proposed subcontractors in the past five years, estimate the percentage involvement of EACH SUBCONTRACTOR on the proposed team. Letters of commitment shall be submitted if credit for the experience and past performance of key subcontractors is desired. In Section H address how your team meets each selection criterion. Describe owned or leased equipment that will be used to perform this contract. Describe the firms overall Quality Management Plan (A project specific design quality control plan must be prepared and approved by the Government as a condition of contract award, but is not required with this submission). Provide a narrative discussing the capacity of the team to meet schedules, including adequacy of qualified personnel available and past experience in meeting tight schedules. Also include in section H the number and amount of fees awarded on DOD contracts for A-E services during the twelve months prior to this notice, including change orders and supplemental agreements for all branch offices. Do not include awards to overseas offices for projects outside the United States, its territories and possessions. Do not include awards to a subsidiary if the subsidiary is not normally subject to management decisions, bookkeeping, and policies of a holding or parent company or an incorporated subsidiary that operates under a firm name different from the parent company. Joint ventures shall submit the following additional documentation of the evidence of a joint venture entity: 1) Firms shall provide a copy of a legally binding joint venture agreement, and 2) Identification of the party who can legally bind the joint venture. The SF330 will have a limit of ten projects illustrating specialized experience. Mail your firm's submission of the SF330 to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St, Louis District, Contracting Division CEMVS-CT, 1222 Spruce St., St. Louis Mo. 63103-2833 ATTN: Mr. Archie Ringgenberg, Solicitation Number W912P9-15-R-0716. Mr. Ringgenberg can be reached at 314-331-8505 or via Email at archie.c.ringgenberg@usace.army.mil. Questions regarding this announcement must be in writing and shall be addressed to Mr. Roberto Escobedo at the above address or by Email at Roberto.L.Escobedo@usace.army.mil. Mr. Escobedo can also be reached at 314-331-8528. Solicitation packages are not provided. This is not a Request for Proposal for contract award. As required by acquisition regulations, interviews for the purpose of discussing prospective contractor's qualifications for the contract will be conducted only after submittal review by the selection board. Interviews will be conducted by telephone. Please check for amendments to this announcement after the publication date.

Sencha EXT JS Pro Upgrade

Defense Information Systems Agency, Procurement Directorate | Published June 23, 2016  -  Deadline June 28, 2016
cpvs

The Office of the Secretary of Defense/ Cost Analysis & Program Evaluation (OSD/CAPE) requires brand-name, proprietary Sencha EXT JS Pro upgrade software and support, which includes Sencha Architect 3.5.

AE Photogrammetric & LiDAR Surveying & Mapping

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | Published September 16, 2015
cpvs

Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services for Photogrammetric and LiDAR Surveying and Mapping and related services to support the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) offices, DOD installations, and other Federal Agencies, State, Local, and Tribal Governments

Y--Project # 573-14-800 Correct Bed Tower Architectural Deficiencies

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA North Florida/South Georgia Health Care System | Published October 23, 2015  -  Deadline October 8, 2015
cpvs

FOR INFORMATION ONLY: This Synopsis is ONLY A NOTIFICATION that a solicitation is anticipated and forthcoming. This is not a solicitation and does not constitute a commitment or an obligation by the government. This notice is not a request for offers, quotes or proposals. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONTRACT ACTION: In accordance with the Veterans First Contracting Program and the Authority under 38 USC 8127-8128 (Sections 502 and 503 of Public Law (P.L.) 109-461), FAR Part 6.302-5(b) (6), and VAAR 819.7007, the Government intends to negotiate a firm fixed price construction contract to a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) for Project Number 573-14-800; CORRECT BED TOWER ARCHITECTURAL DEFICIENCIES, MALCOM RANDALL VAMC GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA. The bases of this requirement is to provide construction work to include widening of exit stairwell doors, installation of automatic door openers in public restrooms and other designated areas, provide fall protection equipment at roof and cooling tower at mechanical building, construct an ante-room (vestibule) , construct external metal canopies for electrical room entrance, construct sally ports at Mental Health corridors, etc. This acquisition is 100% Set-Aside for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Only. The government intends to negotiate this contract with a SDVOSB concern. IAW, VAAR §836.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects, the price range is between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000; the NAICS Code for this acquisition is 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' industry and a Small Business Size Standard is $36.5Mil. The completion period is not to exceed 250 calendar days after NTP. ON OR ABOUT November 12, 2015 the solicitation documents for this project will be available via the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website at www.fbo.gov under solicitation number VA248-15-R-1504. Your firm must be registered with the FBO website to download the solicitation documents. NO CD'S OR HARD COPIES WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE.

C--IDIQ CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR COST ENGINEERING AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PROJECTS LOCATED THROUGHOUT NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND ATLANTIC AOR, WORLDWIDE

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published June 21, 2016  -  Deadline July 21, 2016
cpvs

See Attached

C--IDIQ FOR MULTI DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SUPPORT OF PROJECTS IN THE NAVFAC ATLANTIC AOR PRIMARILY JEB LC-FS, NSN NORFOLK AND NAS OCEANA

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published June 24, 2015
cpvs

Projects may involve single or multiple disciplines. Projects may include multiple disciplines or single disciplines, including but not limited to architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, fire protection, and interior design. Projects may include the following engineering and design services, but are not limited to, (a) Building construction and addition of Special Projects and MILCON facilities; (b) General building renovation work; (c) Development of Design-Bid-Build packages; (d) Development of Design-Build Request for Proposal (RFP) packages; (e) Conducting Life Safety Code Studies; (f) Interior space planning/design studies; (g) Engineering and design site work, paving, landscaping, communications, fire protection, energy conservation systems, and utilities; (h) Facility planning, which includes project programming documents (1391 development) which entails preparation of basic project documents of Form DD 1391 in Navy’s Electronic Procurement Generator (EPG); (i) Development of requirements and project scope; (j) Preparation of engineering evaluations; (k) Preparation of unit guidance costs or parametric cost estimating; (l) Development of alternatives and economic analysis; (m) Analysis of proposed sites for foundations, utilities, access, constraints and identification of environmental, sustainable design and anti-terrorism/force protection issues; (n) Government collateral equipment lists; (o) USGBC LEED Checklists and Sustainable Design Reports; (p) Developing building commissioning requirements; (q) Project preliminary hazard analysis, obtaining permits and regulatory approvals; (r) Review of contractor submittals, field consultation and inspection during construction; (s) Title II Inspection; (t) Electronic Operation and Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI); and (u) Record document preparation.

Y--INDEFINITE QUANTITY INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACT FOR MULTI-DISCIPLINE ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PROJECTS IN THE NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC, HAMPTON ROADS IPT AOR AND NAVFAC ATLANTIC AOR

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command | Published September 30, 2015
cpvs

N40085-15-D-0092 Doyon Project Services, LLC 33810 Weyerhaeuser Way S., Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 N40085-15-D-0093 EMR, Inc. 2110 Delaware Street, Suite B Lawrence, Kansas 66046 N40085-15-D-0094 GP Absher Once, LLC 2700 Holloway Road, Suite 107 Louisville, Kentucky 40299 N40085-15-D-0095 Ocean Construction Services 104 Aragona Blvd. Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 N40085-15-D-0096 Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc. 1491 Furnace Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104 N40085-15-D-0097 Syncon, LLC 201 Research Drive, Suite 101 Chesapeake, Virginia 23320 The seed project, P-992 Fast Company Training Facility, Yorktown, VA, Task Order 0001 was awarded to Ocean Construction Services in the amount of $$4,679,249 for line items 0001, 0002, and 0003.

Y--100% Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) VA248-15-R-1504_573-14-800 Correct Bed Tower Architectural Deficiencies

Department of Veterans Affairs, VA North Florida/South Georgia Health Care System | Published January 14, 2016
cpvs

No Description Provided

PROFESSIONAL NAVAL ARCHITECTURAL AND MARINE ENGINEERING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF VARIOUS NOAA VESSELS

Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) | Published November 19, 2015  -  Deadline January 6, 2016
cpvs

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Eastern Acquisition Division, Norfolk, VA, on behalf of the Office of Marine and Aviation Operations (OMAO), is seeking small business firms that are highly qualified to provide services of Architect-Engineer (A-E) Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering in support of the various vessels assigned to OMAO. The Government anticipates awarding multiple Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts. Each contract will have a sixty (60) month ordering period. The maximum total dollar amount to be awarded and shared among all contracts shall not exceed $8.1 million. Should it be in the Government's interest to award a single IDIQ contract in lieu of multiple contracts, the single contract will have a sixty (60) month ordering period with a maximum value of $8.1 million. The contracts shall have a minimum contract guarantee amount of $5,000.00. Each task order will have a scope of work that will describe the specific project requirements and the length of its performance period. The performance period of individual task orders may vary based on the level of effort required by the scope of work. Task orders may be issued on a firm fixed-price, time and materials or labor hour basis. The primary work site will be at the contractor's facility; however, performance may be required at the Marine Operations Center offices and aboard NOAA ships and boats in U.S. ports, at sea, and at sites throughout the world. Task orders will be awarded in accordance FAR 36.6 Architect-Engineer Services and the terms of the contract. This acquisition is 100% set-aside for small business concerns. The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541330, Engineering Services, specifically Marine Engineering and Naval Architecture, with an applicable size standard of $38.5 million. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.219-14 entitled "LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING" is applicable to this acquisition, requiring that at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended by employees of the concern. NOAA currently operates and maintains ships as identified on the NOAA Marine Operations website http://www.moc.noaa.gov/, including oceanographic, fisheries, and living marine resource research ships, as well as hydrographic survey ships between 726 and 3,250 long tons of displacement. The smallest of these is a steel small waterplane area twin hull (SWATH); all others are steel monohulls. NOAA also operates and maintains boats in support of oceanographic, hydrographic, or fisheries research projects. These include rigid hull inflatable boats (RHIBs) or aluminum hull boats that may be carried on board NOAA ships or involved in near coastal research work. These boats vary in size up to 50 feet (15 meters) in length. A boat's type, make, and configuration will vary in size depending upon its intended purpose. SCOPE: Tasks may involve single or multiple disciplines, and will include a variety of assignments including, but not limited to: 1. Development of engineering specifications and drawings for alterations, designs, construction, repairs, maintenance, requirements, feasibility, conceptual, and preliminary design studies of ships, boats and related support systems. 2. Conducting design studies to develop procurement specifications, associated drawings, cost estimate(s), and government-furnished Equipment (GFE) procurement specifications for construction, repair, and alteration of ships, small boats, and related support systems. 3. Conducting detail design studies on ship systems to develop engineering specifications and drawings, cost estimate(s), schedules, and labor estimates for construction, repair, and alterations of ships, small craft and related support systems. 4. Conducting stability tests, prototype installations, predictive and preventative maintenance analyses, engineering inspections and tests, weight and moment analyses, trim and stability analyses, preparation of weight reports and trim and stability booklets, and other ship system analyses for OMAO vessels. 5. Conduct fleet support studies, economic analyses, and operation research analyses for fleet maintenance, operation, modernization, alteration and logistic support. 6. Provide deliverable materials for computer-aided design (CAD), drafting and engineering products, drawings, calculations, reports, and graphics. 7. Coordinate with required subcontractor American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) as necessary to maintain ships in classification and compliance with statutory requirements. SELECTION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Submit your qualifications on GSA Standard Form (SF) 330 ("ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS", OMB No. 9000-0157) and follow its instructions except as modified below. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT THE SF330 IS CONTAINED HEREIN. THERE IS NO SEPARATE RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection shall be in accordance with FAR Part 36.6. Criterion 1 and 2 are of equal importance to each other and combined are more important than criterion 3, 4 and 5, which are listed in descending order of importance. Each potential contractor will be evaluated in terms of its: 1. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence (SF330, Section F) 2. Professional Qualifications (SF330, Section E) 3. Past Performance (SF330, Section H) 4. Capacity (SF330, Section H) 5. Quality Control Program (SF330, Section H) SF330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm(s) based on the responses to the selection criteria described herein. CRITERION 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL COMPETENCE: Demonstrate specialized experience and technical competence in the technical specialties below. This list is provided for reference and does not exclude other areas of experience or competence, which may be presented as pertinent to this requirement. 1) Hull Systems a) Hydro mechanics b) Machinery foundations c) Structural design d) General arrangements e) Structural maintenance and repair f) Cathodic protection 2) Ship Control Systems a) Helm b) Engine c) Rudder d) Navigation e) Communications f) Research ship mission operations 3) Mission Support Systems a) Living marine resource handling and laboratory systems b) Computer systems c) Communication systems d) Hydrographic sensor and plotting systems e) Oceanographic sensor and laboratory systems f) Scientific mission computer systems g) Scientific mission communication systems 4) Deck Machinery Systems a) Weight handling systems (scientific mission support) i) A-Frames ii) J-Frames iii) Cranes iv) Platforms b) Winches c) Deck Machinery d) Ship's launches 5) Propulsion and Control Systems a) Main propulsion b) Propellers c) Diesel engines d) Machinery controls e) Automated plant controls f) Gears g) Shafting h) Diesel electric engines 6) Auxiliary Systems a) Pump and associated piping service systems b) Compressor and associated piping service systems c) HVAC systems d) Hydraulic systems e) Potable water systems f) Waste systems (solid, oil, and water) g) Steering systems h) Rudder systems 7) Electrical Systems a) Power generation b) Power distribution c) Interior communications d) Lighting systems e) Conditioning 8) Berthing, Messing, and Habitability Systems a) Crew support services b) Passenger support services 9) Ship Support Systems a) Ship logistic support management b) Commercial regulatory standards c) Computer aided logistic support d) Hazardous materials management e) Economic analysis f) Computer and CAD applications g) Machinery condition analysis h) Vibration analysis i) Infrared analysis CRITERION 2 - PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Provide professional qualifications and capabilities of the staff to be assigned to this contract (grouped by firm, with personnel of the prime contractor first). Identify which of the prime contractor employees are key personnel who will have major contract responsibilities and/or provide unusual or unique expertise. An individual identified as key personnel shall be an employee of the prime contractor. Qualifications of staff will be considered if the individuals are permanent employees of the prime contractor or if the prime contractor clearly demonstrates that it has teaming and subcontracting arrangements in place which gives the prime contractor management authority over these individuals. Minimum qualifications of key personnel and other staff are provided in Attachment 1. Include recent experience in performing tasks relevant to the list in Criterion 1. The Program Manager or Senior Technical Manager shall be a registered professional engineer. Submit resumes for key personnel in Section E of the SF330. Resumes should cite project specific experience and the individual's proposed role in the proposed contract. Include each proposed key person who will participate significantly in the work required for this contract. Each resume shall include projects that best illustrate the individual's qualifications and experience relevant to the requirements of this contract. Provide resumes only for those key personnel who will actually perform work under the proposed contract. Key personnel identified under this criterion should also be shown with their roles on the Organizational Chart provided under Section D of the SF330. Identify the state and discipline of actively licensed professional engineers. Identify personnel with specialty certifications and the credentialing bodies that granted them. CRITERION 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE: The Government will evaluate past performance using the projects listed by the firm in Section F of the SF330. The evaluation will consider the team's past performance on relevant contracts with government and/or commercial projects in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Points of contact provided in the SF330 may be contacted. The prime contractor and its proposed team/subcontractors will be evaluated based on past performance assessments and other available information regarding past performance. Where there is no record of past performance, the firm will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Superior performance ratings on relevant projects may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. In Section H of the SF330, submit an A-E Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) evaluation for each project listed under Criterion 1. If a completed ACASS/CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the completed SF330 package. If an ACASS/CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client's project point of contact. Submitted ACASS/CPARS evaluations will not be counted as part of the page limitation and shall be attached to the SF330, behind the SF330 Part II document. For projects provided in support of past performance in Section F of SF330, list and provide copies of any applicable performance awards received (not counted in the 40 page limitation for SF330, Part I). Clearly indicate to which Section F project the award relates; otherwise the information may not be considered. CRITERION 4 - CAPACITY: The evaluation will consider the firm's capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Firms will be evaluated based on projected workload and staffing, and ability to meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-14, LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING. Firms must demonstrate capacity to work on multiple projects in dispersed locations. On form SF330, Section H, indicate the firm's present and projected workload (including project type, dollar amount, and complexity), staffing plan, (including location of staff), and the availability of the proposed team for this contract performance period. Provide any additional information pertinent to the firm's capacity to meet the FAR 52.219-4 requirement that at least 50% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the prime contractor. Demonstrate capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously with overlapping delivery dates. CRITERION 5 - QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM: The evaluation will consider the firm's corporate quality control program, processes and procedures, and assigned authorities for the Quality Control (QC) program to ensure technical accuracy of the A-E work product and effective cross-coordination among firms. For firms teaming with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices. Firms that demonstrate a QC process that will minimize the Government's quality assurance (QA) effort in reviewing the A-E's work product may be considered more favorably in the evaluation. Submittal of broad or generic quality control manual is not acceptable. Provide a description of the steps the project team will use for each of the tasks under the proposed contract that relate to: (1) Management of workload, coordination between team members, and assignment of tasks to appropriate personnel across all disciplines; (2) Use of appropriate technical methodology, technical and regulatory accuracy, consistency between resource topics in a single document; (3) Illustrate successes in ensuring quality and identify any commendations or evaluations regarding QC; (4) In addition to technical document preparation, discuss how the project team proposes to provide quality service in terms of understanding government client objectives, following government-provided document forms and templates, providing timely responses to Government requests, and reducing government time and effort required to manage the contract; (5) Of special interest are the quality control processes for checking documents in place that minimize the Government's need to perform quality assurance reviews of the A-E's work product for errors, omissions, and quality across all disciplines. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Qualified firms are invited to submit a completed SF330. Documents shall be annotated with identification number NMAN7200-14-00205. The SF330, Part I, is limited to forty (40) single-sided 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch pages. A page refers to one printed side of a piece of paper (e.g., 20 pieces of paper printed on both sides equates to 40 total pages). The only exception is the Organization Chart that may be an 11 inch X 17 inch page, with half inch margins and one-sided. The SF330 shall include a completed Part II for each team member and branch office identified in Part I. There is no page limit for Part II. Submit one (1) original and four (4) hard copy packages of the SF330 in 3 ring binders (comb bound proposals will not be accepted). Minimum font size is 10 point for Parts I and II, excluding any pre-formatted font in SF330 forms. Margins will be ½ inch on non-SF330 pages. Firms shall fully complete Part I, Sections A through C of the SF330. In Section B, block 5, firms shall provide their DUNS number in addition to the name of the firm. Under Part 1, Section D, in addition to the instructions provided for the SF330, provide an organizational chart that identifies the overall relationship and lines of authority of the proposed team. Non-key personnel may also be shown on the organizational chart. The organizational chart will not be counted as part of the page limit for Part I, but it must be affixed to the submittal to prevent separation in handling. Firms that elect to propose as a joint venture (JV) or Limited Liability Company (LLC) (as a separate legal entity) shall submit their legally binding formal JV or LLC agreement(s) along with their Standard Form (SF) 330. All such agreements shall be signed by the parties and shall demonstrate the relations between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind them. The JV or LLC shall also be registered in the System for Award Management at https://www.sam.gov at the time of SF330 submission. The legal documentation verifying the JV or LLC will not be considered part of the page limit for SF330 submission. Joint Venture agreements shall be submitted in Section H, Additional Information of the SF330. Section I shall be signed and dated by the Offeror's Authorized Representative. Additional Information: THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - DO NOT SUBMIT PRICE PROPOSALS AT THE TIME OF SF330 SUBMISSION. All information must be included in the SF330 package. Cover letters, excess number of pages and attachments other than those prescribed herein will be excluded from the evaluation process. In accordance with Selection of Architects and Engineers, 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11 (previously known as the Brooks Act), the firm must be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm and shall submit proof of this with the submission of the SF330. Specifically, section 901(1) of Selection of Architects and Engineers, 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11 requires that a firm be a legal entity permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture and engineering. In states where firms are required to be registered under state law, firms shall submit that information. Should the A-E be permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture and engineering in more states within the geographic region covered by the proposed contract, firms shall submit that information. In states where a firm is not required to be registered under state law, the name of the registered architect or engineer with their state registration number and business license is acceptable. Firms must submit proof with the SF330 that they have filed the Organizational Record Form for their principal office(s). All firms are advised that registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database is required prior to award of a contract. Failure to register in the SAM database may render a firm ineligible for award. SAM is a Federal Government owned and operated free website that consolidates the capabilities of CCR (Central Contractor Registration), ORCA (Online Representations and Certifications Application), and EPLS (Excluded Parties List System). It is the primary Government repository for current and prospective federal awarded information. Firms shall ensure you complete your SAM registration for the same name and address identified as the submitting office on your SF330, with its associated CAGE code, DUNS or DUNS + 4. Registration instructions and information can be accessed from the SAM home page at https://www.sam.gov. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Firms having capabilities to perform this work and desiring to be considered shall submit five hard copy packages, each consisting of one completed SF-330 (latest edition) submission for the project as follows: One (1) original hard copy of the SF330 Response to: DOC/NOAA Eastern Acquisition Division (EAD) Attn: Melissa R. Sampson 200 Granby Street, Suite 815 Norfolk, VA 23510 One (1) hard copy of the SF330 Response to: Department of Commerce Office of General Counsel Contract Law Division Attn: Florence Bridges 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230 Three (3) hard copies of the SF 330 Response to: NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations Marine Operations Center Attn: Geoff Wilkie, Naval Architect 2002 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365-5275 SF330 Responses are due no later than 3:00 p.m., local time, January 6, 2016; however, interested/qualified firms need not wait until then to submit. Submittals received after this date and time will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208. Electronic submission is not approved and responses submitted by electronic means shall not be accepted. The original SF330 response due to EAD Norfolk constitutes the official-time stamp submission. It is the firm's responsibility to check the FEDBIZOPPS website at www.fedbizopps.gov for revisions to this announcement or other notices. Inquiries regarding this notice shall be submitted in writing no later than seven (7) business days prior to the response date to Michelle Blake, Contract Specialist, at michelle.blake@noaa.gov and simultaneously to Melissa R. Sampson, Contracting Officer, at melissa.r.sampson@noaa.gov.

Pharmacy Refill Request and Appointment Reminder Solution (RxRefill)

Other Defense Agencies, Defense Health Agency | Published April 30, 2015  -  Deadline June 1, 2015
cpvs

The requirement is for the acquisition and deployment of a leased Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) RxRefill solution offering an automated telephone solution for:  Pharmacy prescription refill request processing Processing refill requests while the Military Health System  (MHS) Pharmacy System (currently Composite Health Care System (CHCS)) is unavailable  Beneficiary notifications for appointments and referrals  Reminder calls to beneficiaries who fail to pick up prescription refills  Beneficiary notifications/communications (e.g. surveys, drug recalls, etc.) The intent is to maintain and, when possible, enhance the current capabilities within the MHS direct care system by using a standardized commercially available automated process for requesting pharmacy prescription refills, and r eceiving reminders for appointments, referrals and prescription refill pick-ups. Final design of the selected vendor shall use an architecture that provides the required functionality in the most cost effective manner for the Government.